Real talk: I'm not going to say that journalists shouldn't ever cover any difficult trans issues. I couldn't say that.

But... it's honestly bizarre how many people seem to believe (or at least argue) that their work exists in a vacuum.
It's not particularly controversial to know that if a topic is covered in a particularly biased way, if it is lopsided, if it is sensationalized, etc. then that will influence people's beliefs, even if a particular article is factually correct.
Most people in this country know very, very little about trans healthcare, what it entails, what the process is for medical transition, and things like that. They have no basis to understand what is normal and what is not.
For instance, I CONTINUALLY find it impossible to convince people that surgeries aren't being performed on children. Some of this is bad faith, but some of it is due to the fact that all anyone knew about trans people in the past was 'sex changes'.
Most people in this country have NO reference for any part of the 'debate'. Consider that from their perspective what they saw was: sex changes and TS porn, then Caitlyn Jenner, then articles about problems with treatment for trans youth. That's what they SAW.
So while one may not INTEND to start a panic about it, it's not exactly difficult to see the connections, nor is it unreasonable to ask if editors and journalists weren't perhaps a bit too eager to cover an incredibly niche and esoteric topic without considering the context.
Consider that articles like Jesse Singal's Atlantic piece were on the cover. The 'other side' gets MAYBE covered in an LGBT section, if there is one.
Writers and editors might consider it unnecessary to cover what is normal because that's dog bites man. But what we have is a situation where people believe that men are going around biting dogs all the time.
What I will say is that writers and editors across a broad range of publications (The Atlantic, BBC, Guardian, New Statesman, LA Times) have contributed to a panic about trans youth. I won't say for certain that it's out of malice, but even if it wasn't, it's still happening.
It's extremely frustrating because people want it both ways. They want both the juicy stories about the terror of 'trans activists', while also claiming to have nothing to do with a panic over trans activism.
Even a shred of contrition would go a long way in making me believe in their good intentions and sincere wish for trans rights... but that won't happen.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MILF's Acid Arrow

MILF's Acid Arrow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cambrian_era

7 Apr
You'll be shocked to learn that NC's Bill 514 is a mess of lies and misdirection, in addition to being one of the most straightforwardly fascist anti-LGBT bills the GOP has mustered in recent memory.
Apologies while I go through this.
a) 'Encouragement' is untrue. It's unclear what 'assisting' means.
b) 'Experimental' is a loaded term. It's off-label, yes, but puberty blockers have been long studied for precocious puberty. That is, we know what they do.
Once again, this is untrue. No one is doing bottom surgery on minors. And regarding cosmetic surgery: This is actually legal... for cis people. But it's still untrue, because if you went on puberty blockers, you're less likely to need cosmetic surgery.
Read 18 tweets
7 Apr
I think part of my problem with genius worship is that it's rarely historically accurate. There have occasionally been people who work far ahead of the cutting edge, but those instances are incredibly rare.
Like, science is an iterative social process, it's not a bunch of dudes with big brains thinking really hard and then lives get better. You look at a lot of innovations or discoveries and in their proper context, they seem inevitable.
There's a reason that when you learn about the history of science you often come across disputes about who discovered or invented or whatever something first.
Read 5 tweets
6 Apr
One thing that annoys me with the sort of surgery-first framing is that when we're talking about gender confirming treatments for youth, we're talking about two things: Puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy.
But for those who are still uninformed: The entire point of puberty blockers is to give a child more time to decide what they wish to do.

That is to say: If your concern is with young people thinking they are transgender then regretting it... THEY WOULD HELP.
I have to explain it repeatedly, but there is NO NULL CHOICE. Not doing anything results in people going through puberty. HRT results in going through, well, a different puberty.
Read 15 tweets
5 Apr
I feel like I am going insane looking at boomers seeing a pretty simple chart and completely refusing to understand it.
I don't see how you see A NEW CATEGORY FOR 350k DEATHS and go, "Pandemic fake". Like, MAYBE you can argue that if the jump in injuries, if it likely means a jump in ODs, was caused by the lockdown, but... it could also be caused by the pandemic in general.
Or by neither! Causes are hard! But you know what you can't deny?
a) The pandemic killed a lot of people
b) The lockdown did not cause suicides to rise
Read 4 tweets
5 Apr
Once AGAIN I constantly need to remind super smart, ultra intelligent dudes who are fans of only the smartest men that infectious diseases that spread by airborne transmission are not the same as others.
While, yes, sure, a mosquito spread disease could be transmitted from me to you without my knowing it, you can see why it's far more likely to happen if it's airborne right???????
"COVID only has a blah blah blah death rate if you're under 50!" YES YOU DIPSHIT BUT I COULD SPREAD IT TO ANY NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITHOUT KNOWING AND NOT ALL OF THEM HAVE THE SAME RISK LEVEL AS ME.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!