I know this stance isn’t gonna make me a lot of friends on this site, but yeah, I am a little frustrated that we’re proposing more than twice as much additional spending on seniors as we are on R&D in a package everyone was originally told would be primarily about infrastructure.
Federal R&D spending is at historic lows while spending on seniors is at historic highs. I’d feel better if 1) R&D was better funded and/or 2) the care provisions were offset with health cost savings - we can’t keep just expanding benefits without controlling sky-high costs.
Anyway here’s why we need more R&D: forbes.com/sites/benritz/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben "Tax Inheritances" Ritz

Ben

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BudgetBen

3 Mar
The life of a moderate is campaigning for more practical proposals than that of the ideologues, then watching your advocacy result in a final policy that is somehow even worse than if you had just let the ideologues get their way in the first place 😢
I guess now I have to point out that the reverse is also true, and if the ideologues accepted good moderate policies from the start we would be even more better off.

The main point here is that legislative sausage-making can result in the worst of both sides instead of the best.
Another way to frame this: we don't get broken proposals like today's without the left/right doing their thing too.

Like yes this phase-out is dumb but it is nowhere near as dumb as $2k/month for everyone that the far left was demanding.
Read 4 tweets
3 Mar
This might come as a huge surprise to y'all, but I actually... really don't like this. Would create an effective marginal tax rate >50% between $75,000 and $80,000, and potentially nearing 100% (depending on how it's structured) for single parents and families with multiple kids.
If I were a worker making $80k I would be furious about this in a way I would not have been as a $100k worker under the House framework.
At this point enough is enough: we should just keep the House bill's check provision. This really dumb change makes checks more rather than less inequitable & saves hardly any money. (Lowering the phase-out start would also be fine but there's no appetite)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!