I so wish I hadn't completely sabotaged Brexit by being unable to stop it happening. If only I'd compromised and not asked for a second referendum which I didn't get anyway, then we wouldn't be in the mess we're in, and we would have got Brexit done.
In hindsight, Remainers bear a heavy burden for Brexit. If we hadn't opposed Theresa May then we wouldn't have provoked a landslide Tory victory with an 80-seat majority allowing them to do literally whatever they wanted re Brexit. With such latitude, there was only ever one...
...option: the most damaging and chaotic Brexit imaginable short of literally closing the borders permanently. I feel so ashamed of myself for opposing it. And by the way, all this has made me realise we were definitely right to leave.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Neil Fawcett

Neil Fawcett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarristerNF

30 Dec 20
Starmer and Blair are mistaken in thinking that Brexit has to be accepted to be dealt with. Accepting Brexit will not make its supporters *less* angry. Getting Brexit, instead has and will make them *more* angry. Why? A cycle of distorted grievance, false promise and anger. /1
The destruction of the economy by the 2008 financial crisis caused huge pain. That pain has been harnessed and directed into nationalism. Public anger cannot be sated because it has been built on a vague and dishonest pretext: people truly believe that Europe, immigrants, /2
the welfare state and a degradation of national pride and "sovereignty" are to blame for their ills. Because that is untrue, the promise of nationalism can never deliver results. Nationalism will keep on consuming. Appeasement is as futile as trying to appease a forest fire. /3
Read 6 tweets
27 Dec 20
The EU named their programme after a scholar of the Renaissance. The UK named theirs after a wartime mathematician. Cementing our image of living our national identity forever between 1939-1945, even as we slowly decay.
The tweet wasn't intended as Turin-bashing by the way. Sure he was a good bloke. But what about Ernest Rutherford? Image
Turing*
Read 6 tweets
24 Sep 20
THREAD: It is important to realise that troll farms deliberately engage in subtle tactics on an extremely large scale to encourage argument and polarisation on sensitive topics. The goal is to further the foreign policy of their employer by eventually making /1
compromise and understanding on those issues meaningless. It is a tried and tested method of subversion applied to the era of the internet. A lecture on it from the Cold War can be found here: /2
a summary of the methods of these online agitators can be found here:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_w… /3
Read 7 tweets
23 Sep 20
What?! A border between Kent and the rest of the UK? Brexit just gets more and more INSANE. #kentborder #Brexit
🤯 oh god. Just why. Why are we doing this crazy mental stupid mental thing?
😭 it's just so mental.
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep 20
THREAD: I happened across BBC News a couple of minutes ago, for the first time in ages. Completely unchallenged govt position that it's the public's fault for not following the rules. Clips from Marr questioning Hancock tamely about what measures will be imposed if people /1
dont follow the rules. Completely ignored the fact that the govt has only just stopped telling people to eat out to help out, get back to normal, go to the pub. Apparently this is the public's fault. Next came a focus on Keir Starmer and how much work he apparently has to do /2
to win back trust. Trust? Seriously? Any mention at all about recent events, or things the govt may have done which have completely destroyed public trust? Has Starmer only just become leader? Then came the vox pops from morons: "I'd never vote for KS, he was too much of a /3
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep 20
Chomsky comes out with a lot of mad, overly confident and wacky ideology. But consider this: democracy is on the decline, we've had two massive global financial crises in the last few years. NATO is weakened. Russia is belligerent. China is assertive. Xi and Putin are /1
now rulers for life (possibly a preparatory but nevertheless ominous step). Turkey is a dictatorship, Ukraine was invaded, Belarus is collapsing, the USA, Poland, Hungary and UK are lurching towards varying degrees of authoritarianism. India is turning its back on democracy. /2
Climate change is an increasingly urgent threat. The last time all this sort of upheaval happened there were two devastating world wars. This time, all the main players have atomic weapons. Not at all looking great is it? Did I miss anything out? #InternalMarketBill /e
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!