PSYCHOLOGY REPORT
'It is my professional opinion that current policies intended to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission within Child A's School, and their manner of implementation, are causing unintended psychological and developmental harm to young people within the school community.'
'It is my view that there is potential for significant harms to young people's social, emotional and cognitive development and their well-being.'
'Children across the UK are being subjected to psychological and developmental harms due to widespread adoption of Government-endorsed SARS-CoV-2 policies in schools.'
'Research has shown that social deprivation and isolation have unique effects on brain and behaviour in adolescence compared with other stages of life.'
'Given the importance of adolescence in the developmental trajectory of human beings, and increasing knowledge about the sensitivity of the adolescent brain to environmental influences and stressors, there is real potential for far-reaching consequences.'
'Findings from recent studies have started to confirm concerns about harm caused to children and young people by such unprecedented social policies.'
'Since March 2020, Coronavirus-related Government policy has seen schools close, children compelled to stay at home and refrain from organised sport and other activities. They have been forbidden to engage in face-to-face contact with extended family members, friends and peers.'
'For the first time in UK history, such rules have been imposed by a government upon a whole generation of children and young people, in spite of decades of accumulated knowledge and understanding about the necessary circumstances for optimal child and adolescent development.'
'It does not seem unreasonable, therefore, to describe this as a social experiment which has been conducted without informed consent, and without due consideration of the enormous potential for harm.'
'The introduction of social distancing and other non-pharmaceutical interventions in schools since their reopening, and the recommendation of masking secondary-school children, has clearly not been appropriately risk assessed.'
'There is compelling evidence that children and young people have borne a disproportionate psychological burden on behalf of the nation. Research findings indicate that they are facing an unprecedented mental health crisis, the full scale of which is yet unknown.'
'Incidence of mental health disorders in young people, which has risen sharply since 2007, appears to have escalate further since March 2020. Clinically significant mental health conditions amongst children has risen by 50% compared to three years earlier.'
' A staggering 1 in 6 children reported behaviours and symptoms hat suggested a probable mental health condition, up from 1 in 9 in 2017. Since July 2020, children and young people in the UK have endured a further nine months of restrictions of varying degrees.'
'These experiences will have further detrimental impact on young people's mental health. It is increasingly evident that the [Government's response to the] pandemic has taken a devastating toll on the mental health of the young which will impact on their lives for years to come.'
'In this context, it is arguable, now more than ever, that schools have a duty of care to young people, to safeguard and promote the healthy, normative development and emotional well-being of their students.'
'Professionals working with children are trained to hold the interest of children as paramount, and have a duty to place their needs at the forefront of all they do. The Children's Act 2004 states that the welfare and safeguarding of children is everyone's responsibility.'
'The UK Government is also beholden to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The four core principles of the convention are: non-discrimination; devotion to the best interests of the child; the right to life, survival, development; and respect for the view of the child.'
'It is therefore deeply disturbing that, since March 2020, the principles of this legislation and the Convention appear to have been forgotten, both by many professionals and officials with responsibility for children's welfare, and by the UK Government itself.'
'SARS-CoV-2 policies in place both within schools and wider society, work against the manner in which child psychologists and other child professional are trained to work with and think about children and young people.'
'Since March 2020, the Government has enforced or recommended interventions which hinder communication, lower self-esteem, increase anxiety and impair development to an extent that, if this happened in a private family, it would be considered a safeguarding issue.'
'There is a professional obligation on the part of all people working with, or on behalf of, children to consider whether a plan of action does in fact place children's rights as paramount and whether it is in their best interests.'
'In my opinion, school policy in relation to limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission not only prevents the school from supporting Child A and their peers to "thrive" and "fulfil their potential", but is likely to be causing them psychological harm of unknown quantity.'
'The practices at Child A's school are similar to those introduced in most secondary schools across the country, meaning the scale of damage to children is potentially monumental.'
'Therefore, the widespread implementation of non-risk assessed and potentially harmful policies, both now and in the future, is an urgent matter for all concerned with the welfare of children and young people.'
— Dr. Zenobia Storah, Clinical Psychologist clinical-partners.co.uk/clinicians/dr-…
From a Psychology report in respect of Civil Proceedings. Please support @laworfiction and other lawyers in their legal challenges to the Government's guidance to schools to enforce the wearing of masks by schoolchildren.
crowdjustice.com/case/stop-mask…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Architects for Social Housing

Architects for Social Housing Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @9thfloor

8 Apr
As of 21 March, 28.8 million doses of experimental gene-based vaccines have been injected into the UK public, resulting in 141,079 reports of 494,493 adverse reactions, including 713 deaths shortly after injection. That's an overall adverse reaction rate of 0.49% per dose.
Adverse reactions to AstraZeneca's product include: 2,411 blood disorders (2 fatal); 3,768 cardiac disorder (51 fatal); 2,574 ear disorders; 4,566 eye disorders; 39,988 gastrointestinal disorders (6 fatal); 131,533 general disorders (196 fatal);
1,109 immune system disorders (1 fatal); 7,375 infections (57 fatal); 2,201 injuries (1 fatal); 4,679 metabolic disorders (2 fatal); 47,015 muscle and tissue disorders (1 fatal); 63 neoplasms (1 fatal); 81,702 disorders of the nervous system (49 fatal); 56 pregnancy conditions;
Read 10 tweets
7 Apr
'Today, the most pressing issue to have arisen is whether a global vaccination programme is needed to end the coronavirus crisis. This question is so important that a debate urgently needs to be conducted to reach a global consensus on three basic points.'
'1. When is the development of a vaccine called for? We venture to answer: when an infection regularly leads to severe illness and/or serious sequelae in healthy individuals. This is not the case with SARS-CoV-2.'
'2. When would mass vaccination not be reasonable? We propose that mass vaccination is not reasonable if a large part of the population is already sufficiently protected against a life-threatening disease. This is the case for SARS-CoV-2.'
Read 19 tweets
7 Apr
Vaccine passports are not being enforced to make us accept experimental vaccines for a virus with an infection fatality rate of 0.05% for under 70s. Vaccines are being used to justify the Government making such passports a condition of our citizenship. Refuse to comply with both.
Before Twitter tells you this is 'misleading' and suspends our account, read about human rights barriers to making vaccination compulsory and how they can be overcome through sectioning the non-compliant under the Mental Health Act or primary legislation.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/01/08/our…
Twitter advises us to 'Learn why health officials recommend a vaccine for most people'. To which end, read our report on the scientists, universities, regulatory bodies, pharmaceutical companies and global investors behind these experimental vaccines.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2020/11/25/bre…
Read 4 tweets
27 Mar
Plymouth NHS Trust manages Derriford Hospital's 1,000 beds. Can anyone explain why, 10 months into a pandemic, 'five or fewer' patients without a pre-existing health condition have died there after a positive RT-PCR test, but that the actual number is 'too low to be disclosed'?
The Trust is 'refusing to supply' the actual number (5 or less deaths) under Section 41 (1) (a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information Act, which is that 'disclosure of the information to the public by the public authority holding it would constitute a breach of confidence.'
However, on its own website, the NHS states that, as of 24 March 2021, 1 year after lockdown, just 3,588 patients without a pre-existing health condition (and 697 under the age of 60) have had their deaths attributed to COVID-19. That's about a third of overall deaths in 1 week.
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
Today, the worst Parliament in British history will vote whether to renew the Coronavirus Act 2020 for the second time. But what powers does this hastily-passed legislation grant the Government, and is any Member of Parliament voting for their continuation fit for office?
Presented without an impact assessment or evidence of proportionality, the 348 pages, 102 Provisions and 29 Schedules of the Coronavirus Bill had just 1 week of reading and 3 days of debate before being made into law on 25 March. Its powers include the following Provisions:
10. Modifies mental health and mental capacity legislation to allow the requirements for the detention and treatment of patients to be satisfied by the opinion of a single doctor. Extends the time for which a patient can be detained from 72 hours to 120 hours prior to sectioning.
Read 45 tweets
23 Mar
AstraZeneca has been caught lying about data yet again. On Monday, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board expressed concern AZ may have included outdated information from its COVID-19 vaccine trial, which may have provided an incomplete view of its efficacy.
nih.gov/news-events/ne…
Last November, it was revealed that AstraZeneca’s claim that its vaccine has an efficacy of 90% was based on a trial only administered to individuals up to 55 years of age, a demographic with a far lower chance of developing symptoms requiring a vaccine.
ft.com/content/4583fb…
And three years ago, in April 2018, it was revealed that AstraZeneca had paid €17.9 million in secret payments to ‘independent’ healthcare professionals to endorse their products, including the use of vaccines. So why would anything have changed now?
thetimes.co.uk/article/20m-se…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!