1/n ResearchGate today has permanently locked my account, which I have had since 2015.
Their reasons graphically show the nature of their attack against democracy, and their corruption of science.
2/n
3/n
4/n
5/n This was the third article, archived before its removal, read some 200 K times: archive.vn/0L5ji
6/n By their obscene non-logic, a scientific review of science articles reporting on harms caused by face masks has a "potential to cause harm".
No criticism of the psychological device (face masks) is tolerated, if the said criticism shows potential to influence public policy.
After reading my chapter in the @canary_covid book, one reader concludes:
"i have come to believe that the whole idea of "pandemic" is fraudulent.... that there is absolutely no threat whatsoever to humanity or civilization from disease, never has been, never will, and moreover,
2. that god gave me an immune system which is up to any challenge nature can come up with. also, it cannot possibly be right to proactively medicate or intervene with entire healthy populations (e.g., "vaccines"), from either a spiritual or medical perspective.
3. i believe "pandemics" are just another made up boogeyman that totalitarian states have fabricated to enslave the masses in fear. i also believe that any historical reports of "pandemics" and "medical miracles of modern science" are entirely fraudulent,
BREAKING: You want proof?
Look at Figure 6A: Booster delivery vs all-cause deaths in Australia by week !
Vaccine injection fatality ratio vIFR = 0.05 % correlation-canada.org/report-probabl…
1. Pointing out that the evidence for respiratory viruses is tenuous and faulty does not prove that there was no pandemic. Rather, it shows that the hypothesis of virus has not been established as viable. You cannot prove a negative. You can only disprove by contradiction.
2. Showing that all-cause mortality does not follow the model of an infectious new viral respiratory disease does prove, by contradiction, that this model was not acting in societies on the planet, that there was no "pandemic".
3. Peaks in all-cause mortality, which are synchronous with vaccine rollouts do not prove that the injections caused the deaths. It becomes a question of the probability of the coincidence, and comparing other reasons for the coincidence.
Soon (within days), collaborators and I will release our latest extensive report, a landmark study of covid, mortality and vaccines
Here it is, maybe the most important article on "covid" and on the "vaccines", with co-authors Baudin and Mercier: researchgate.net/publication/36…
Here are three key points from our paper re USA: 1. The vaccine program did not measurably avert any deaths. 2. The measures killed poor, obese, disabled, isolated individuals. 3. COVID-19 could not have caused the excess mortality, since young adults died more than elderly.