We now have data from mass testing in schools for the first 4 weeks after they fully reopened on March 8th, up to the end of the spring term.
The results suggest that transmission of the virus *has* increased since schools went back .. but mostly amongst staff.
Starting with nurseries and primary schools, the data initially looks rather alarming, with a huge jump in positivity rates the week after schools reopened.
However...
The data is also broken down by role within the school, and we can see that the government started rolling out free lateral flow tests for support and household bubbles to use at home when schools fully reopened.
These are included in the main school test figures!
If you break down positivity rates by role, you can see covid rates are MUCH higher in these bubbles.
Some of this may be genuine, and some of it may be selection bias (people with symptoms using the tests, or people being less likely to report negative results than positives).
If we focus only on staff, whose testing regimen didn't change during this period as far as I know, we can see the proportion of tests reported positive DID rise though, from 0.08% to 0.12%.
(Ignore the mid-Feb bump - it's an artefact caused by much less testing at half term.)
In secondary schools things initially look rather different, with overall positivity rates staying low when schools reopened, before exploding a couple of weeks later.
Again though, this doesn't tell the whole story...
Because in secondary schools pupils are also tested, and their numbers completely dwarf all other testing.
The number of tests used jumped from 350,000 to 830,000 a week as the first pupils were tested prior to returning, then to over 4 million a week when their classes started!
Again, if we break the data down by role, we can see that when pupils returned to school they had lower positivity rates than staff.
This masked the fact that positivity rates for staff were already rising the week that schools reopened, before that could have had any impact.
Again, if we focus only on staff, there's a significant rise in positivity rates, from 0.05% to 0.1%.
Positivity was already rising as schools fully reopened, after a February half term dip, and continued climbing for two weeks after millions of children returned to classrooms.
Meanwhile we can see that actually very few children tested positive when they returned to school.
Positivity bottomed out at 0.047%, barely above the lateral flow tests' false positive rate, which is now believed to be 0.03%.
A couple of weeks later though, rates rose rapidly.
So is this proof that covid IS spreading amongst children in schools? Unfortunately it's not clear, because testing hasn't been consistent.
When pupils first returned they were tested three times under supervision in school.
After that they started testing themselves at home.
If we go back to the testing data, we can see that the number of test results reported by pupils dropped sharply a week and a half after they returned to school. Just as home testing began.
Either some children stopped using the tests and/or they didn't report all their results.
Either of these could skew positivity rates.
You're more likely to use a home test if you're not feeling well (whereas nobody with symptoms should have gone to school to get tested).
And if you do take a test you're (hopefully) more likely to report the result if it's positive.
In fact, even the first round of testing in schools was far from perfect. Although the results were reported, about 12% of tests taken in the first two weeks after schools reopened weren't registered.
Meaning that for over a million tests we have no way of knowing who took them!
The rate for positive tests is a bit lower - 452 positive results (8-9% of the total) weren't properly registered in the first two weeks.
You'd hope these children were still sent home to self-isolate. But even if they were, they may not have been contact traced because of this.
Other issues that may affect the data include:
- Staff who were previously working at home returning to school, increasing their exposure.
- Changes in access to confirmatory PCR testing reducing the number of false positives.
- Whether false positives are more likely at home.
This all makes it hard to say for sure what's happening.
Rates amongst staff have definitely risen since schools fully reopened, but levelled out at the end of March.
Rates also seem to have risen in pupils a week or two later, but this might be skewed by changes in testing.
The good news is that although positivity rates from mass testing in schools have risen significantly since schools fully reopened, they're still very low overall - about 1 in 1,000 at the end of March - and if anything rates amongst staff seem to have levelled off recently.
All of the graphs above are my own, based on data from the Tests Conducted spreadsheet that's released alongside the weekly Test & Trace report.
Aseem Malhotra has been confirmed as a speaker at next weekend's Reform UK conference. The increasingly anti-vaccine cardio crank is already Chief Health Advisor to Farage's anti-WHO "Action on World Health" campaign, and now seems to be angling for a job with Reform too. 🧵
This intersection of far right politics and anti-vaccine health contrarians in the UK is no surprise, after Reform's 2024 manifesto pandered to conspiracy theorists, many of whom helped out on their campaign or even stood as candidates for the party.
Reform's links to anti-vaxxers in the UK go back years. Richard Tice was in contact with ivermectin pusher Tess Lawrie and pandemic denier Jonathan Engler in 2021 and several Reform / Brexit Party veterans were involved in the covid conspiracy movement.
Advance UK recently announced its committee, which includes anti-vax data mangler Norman Fenton, racist conspiracy theorist Jim Ferguson, climate change denier Paul Burgess, and conspiracy theory website editor Kathy Gyngell. 🧵
Paul Burgess was environment spokesman for the far right For Britain Movement (a UKIP splinter group which, like Reform splinter group Advance UK, was backed by Tommy Robinson). He's also appeared on GB News as a "climate commentator".
Kathy Gyngell is the editor of Conservative Woman, a right wing website which during the pandemic went from attacking gay and trans rights and other culture wars nonsense to spreading anti-vaccine propaganda, covid conspiracy theories and AIDS denialism.
The co-founder of "Operation Raise the Colours" (the recent spate of people putting English flags on lamp posts) is an old friend of Tommy Robinson who says he's been "16 years by his side", and had breakfast with Robinson after his release from jail earlier this year. 🧵
Tommy Robinson's mate Andy Saxon and his "Operation Raise the Colours" have also had support from UKIP leader / Turning Point UK COO Nick Tenconi (recently seen giving what looked like a Nazi salute), far right Britain First Party and its co-leader / ex BNP member Paul Golding.
Before his "Operation Raise the Colours" gained momentum recently, Saxon posted support for Britain First and its "remigration" campaign to remove immigrants from the UK, as well as offensive and sometimes threatening Islamophobic content.
🧵 Kate Shemirani's daughter sadly died last year, after refusing chemotherapy for her cancer, in favour of the kind of extreme quackery promoted by her mum.
Refusing to take responsibility, Kate accused the NHS of homicide and subjecting her daughter to medical experimentation.
Kate Shemirani and her ex-husband issued a statement after their daughter's death, wildly claiming that it was part of "a systemic pattern of state-sponsored medical homicide and institutional cover-up" by the NHS, and suggesting that she was part of an "unregulated drug trial".
Inevitably, Kate Shemirani and her allies are using the tragedy to raise money, claiming "they have taken her daughter". Their target is up to £100,000 to challenge the outcome of an inquest that hasn't even happened yet. So far they've only raised £2,455 from gullible followers.
Dilbert creator Scott Adams has sadly got prostate cancer. After going down a rabbit hole during the pandemic though, he turned to Canadian quack William Makis who (as always) recommended ivermectin and fenbendazole. Which did not work. Now they're in an unseemly row over it. 🧵
Ivermectin pusher William Makis responded to Scott Adams' post by claiming he didn't follow his "protocol" (which Adams denies), his cancer was "probably" caused by covid vaccines, and that he "didn't discount the possibility" that Adams was part of a plot to discredit him. 😬
Unsurprisingly Scott Adams is giving short shrift to Makis and other quacks and their followers, who are trying to blame his cancer on covid vaccines or encourage him to try anti-parasitics, vitamins, fasting, diets and other dodgy "cures" for his cancer.
This week sees the second "ARC Forum" in London, a right wing talking shop with overtones of Islamophobia, transphobia and climate change denial, funded by Paul Marshall and Legatum, who are also behind GB News.
Unsurprisingly there are a lot of familiar faces there... 🧵
Alan Miller from anti-lockdown turned anti-everything group Together is on a panel.
He was interviewed at ARC Forum by right wing channel Newsmax Australia, and was apparently "shocked to learn" that, according to them, Australia has no free speech and supports trans people. 🤷♂️
Toby Young founded Daily Sceptic, which like Together started out as anti-lockdown but then branched out into culture war outrage farming and omni-contrarianism.
It's still edited by a member of anti-vax misinformation group HART, who laundered their work through the site.