John Bye Profile picture
Apr 10, 2021 19 tweets 8 min read Read on X
We now have data from mass testing in schools for the first 4 weeks after they fully reopened on March 8th, up to the end of the spring term.

The results suggest that transmission of the virus *has* increased since schools went back .. but mostly amongst staff.
Starting with nurseries and primary schools, the data initially looks rather alarming, with a huge jump in positivity rates the week after schools reopened.

However...
The data is also broken down by role within the school, and we can see that the government started rolling out free lateral flow tests for support and household bubbles to use at home when schools fully reopened.

These are included in the main school test figures!
If you break down positivity rates by role, you can see covid rates are MUCH higher in these bubbles.

Some of this may be genuine, and some of it may be selection bias (people with symptoms using the tests, or people being less likely to report negative results than positives).
If we focus only on staff, whose testing regimen didn't change during this period as far as I know, we can see the proportion of tests reported positive DID rise though, from 0.08% to 0.12%.

(Ignore the mid-Feb bump - it's an artefact caused by much less testing at half term.)
In secondary schools things initially look rather different, with overall positivity rates staying low when schools reopened, before exploding a couple of weeks later.

Again though, this doesn't tell the whole story...
Because in secondary schools pupils are also tested, and their numbers completely dwarf all other testing.

The number of tests used jumped from 350,000 to 830,000 a week as the first pupils were tested prior to returning, then to over 4 million a week when their classes started!
Again, if we break the data down by role, we can see that when pupils returned to school they had lower positivity rates than staff.

This masked the fact that positivity rates for staff were already rising the week that schools reopened, before that could have had any impact.
Again, if we focus only on staff, there's a significant rise in positivity rates, from 0.05% to 0.1%.

Positivity was already rising as schools fully reopened, after a February half term dip, and continued climbing for two weeks after millions of children returned to classrooms.
Meanwhile we can see that actually very few children tested positive when they returned to school.

Positivity bottomed out at 0.047%, barely above the lateral flow tests' false positive rate, which is now believed to be 0.03%.

A couple of weeks later though, rates rose rapidly.
So is this proof that covid IS spreading amongst children in schools? Unfortunately it's not clear, because testing hasn't been consistent.

When pupils first returned they were tested three times under supervision in school.

After that they started testing themselves at home.
If we go back to the testing data, we can see that the number of test results reported by pupils dropped sharply a week and a half after they returned to school. Just as home testing began.

Either some children stopped using the tests and/or they didn't report all their results.
Either of these could skew positivity rates.

You're more likely to use a home test if you're not feeling well (whereas nobody with symptoms should have gone to school to get tested).

And if you do take a test you're (hopefully) more likely to report the result if it's positive.
In fact, even the first round of testing in schools was far from perfect. Although the results were reported, about 12% of tests taken in the first two weeks after schools reopened weren't registered.

Meaning that for over a million tests we have no way of knowing who took them!
The rate for positive tests is a bit lower - 452 positive results (8-9% of the total) weren't properly registered in the first two weeks.

You'd hope these children were still sent home to self-isolate. But even if they were, they may not have been contact traced because of this.
Other issues that may affect the data include:

- Staff who were previously working at home returning to school, increasing their exposure.

- Changes in access to confirmatory PCR testing reducing the number of false positives.

- Whether false positives are more likely at home.
This all makes it hard to say for sure what's happening.

Rates amongst staff have definitely risen since schools fully reopened, but levelled out at the end of March.

Rates also seem to have risen in pupils a week or two later, but this might be skewed by changes in testing.
The good news is that although positivity rates from mass testing in schools have risen significantly since schools fully reopened, they're still very low overall - about 1 in 1,000 at the end of March - and if anything rates amongst staff seem to have levelled off recently.
All of the graphs above are my own, based on data from the Tests Conducted spreadsheet that's released alongside the weekly Test & Trace report.

gov.uk/government/pub…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bye

John Bye Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_johnbye

Dec 21
After the horrific attack on the Christmas market in Magdeburg, all the people you'd expect immediately blamed Islam and called for Muslims to be deported en masse for one man's crime. Just one problem... Apparently the suspect isn't a Muslim. 🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
The apparent suspect in the attack on the Magdeburg market is a Saudi refugee who denounced Islam, accuses Germany of a "secret project to Islamize Europe", and regularly shared posts by far right accounts using similar language to the people who assumed he was an Islamist. Image
Image
Image
Image
Even after the suspect's identity and beliefs were reported, racists and bigots on X were still blaming Islamists for the attack, or even claiming it was an attempt to "gaslight us" and "we all know why the terrorist carried out the attack".

Obviously we *don't* know why yet. Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 22
Proving once again that he'll do anything that gives him an opportunity to promote himself, Aseem Malhotra is appearing at an online "Long COVID masterclass" .. run by a homeopath and featuring several notorious anti-vaxxers, quacks and conspiracy theorists. 🧵
Image
Image
The online event which Aseem Malhotra is taking part in and helping to promote is hosted by an American homeopath and "expert in silver and copper therapeutics", who claims he can cure diseases with herbal medicine and "belief in the Holy Spirit"!

Or in layman's terms, a quack.

Image
Image
Image
Speaking alongside Aseem Malhotra:

1) Judy Mikovits, who's spent the last decade blaming everything from ME and autism to cancer on a retrovirus which she falsely claims is found in vaccines. More recently she starred in the Plandemic series, promoting covid conspiracy theories. Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 18
Good start to Nigel Farage's life as an MP, as he claims that he gave incorrect information to the Register of Interests. 🤦‍♂️ His first entry in the register says he's paid "£97,928.40 a month" by GB News. But now he claims that sum was for "several months of work". 🤷‍♂️
Image
Nigel Farage is also the only employee of the "company" that GB News pays him through. So the whole setup is just a tax dodge, and any "significant expenses" it generates are likely to be Farage's own personal spending.

Which sounds so much better.

…te.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/076507…
Image
The other highlight of Farage's first Register entry is the £32,836 of travel costs a donor paid for him to fly to America to "support a friend who was almost killed". He is, of course, talking about Donald Trump.

It's not clear how this "represented Clacton on the world stage". Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 28
Racist thug Tommy Robinson and racist mug Laurence Fox held an ironically named "unite the kingdom" rally in London this weekend. Unsurprisingly lots of conspiracy theorists turned up to support them. 🧵

Image
Image
Image
Alan Miller interviewed Laurence Fox. In the clip Miller defended Tommy Robinson, and claimed that him almost causing a trial to collapse by breaching reporting restrictions was a "free speech" issue. 🤦‍♂️

Miller leads a group of anti-vax and climate change conspiracy theorists.
Image
Image
In another Miller interview, Norman Fenton described former football hooligan Tommy Robinson as a "great heroic patriot", and said he's been "following him for years".

Fenton is a member of anti-vax misinfo group HART, and has accused the ONS of lying to cover up vaccine deaths. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 14
Conspiracist X went into overdrive after the attempt on Trump's life yesterday. Within minutes they'd already misidentified the shooter and blamed everyone from the CIA and Mossad to the "Deep State" for the shooting, which sadly claimed the life of a bystander at the rally. 🧵 Image
Conspiracy theorists quickly identified the shooter as "antifa extremist" Mark Violets, saying he posted a video before the attack and had been arrested. None of which was true.

The photo is of an Italian football blogger, and the real shooter was dead.

reuters.com/fact-check/ita…



Image
Image
Image
Image
Several also shared footage of the shooter's body being removed from the stand behind Trump. The actual shooter was on a rooftop 120m away.

Meanwhile one fringe politician randomly speculated that the shooter was close to Trump and using some James Bond-esque poison dart gun.

Image
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 29
Last week Andrew Bridgen claimed Ukraine might be working on a dirty bomb to use in a "false flag" attack in Europe. Unsurprisingly his comments have now been amplified by the Russian military and state media, and echoed back by Russian assets and useful idiots here in the UK. 🧵


Image
Image
Image
Andrew Bridgen had an "incredibly productive" meeting with the Russian ambassador in London earlier this year.

Since then he's claimed Rishi Sunak called the election to avoid being a wartime PM, and that Ukraine's planning a "false flag" nuclear attack in Europe "like 9/11". 😳

Image
Image
Image
Meanwhile Russian assets and useful idiots here in the UK have been amplifying these claims of false flag attacks and dirty bombs.

John and Irina Mappin at least are known to have visited the Russian embassy recently, and all frequently share Russian propaganda on social media.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(