"Every musician wants to be a comedian." <- a profound recruiting insight that I've learned the hard way. A thread. /1
2/ the quote references the idea that many musicians enjoy chatting up an audience in between sets. For some, it's not enough to be great at what they do (musician), they want to be involved in many things (general entertainment). It's the generalist vs specialist dilemma.
3/ Founders are often generalists, and generalists play a critical role in many organizations helping to synthesize and "see the forest for the trees." But an organization of nothing but generalists inevitably fails. Excellence in most areas requires specialization.
4/ taking a generalist and demanding they focus narrowly, doesn't work; they become bored and dissatisfied. You want people who *want* to focus narrowly and excel at that thing, at least for a meaningful period of time.
5/ you want to hire an EA who just wants to excel as an executive assistant. Same for your accountant, lawyer, trader, fundamental analyst, etc etc. You need an army of specialists with just a few generalists in the mix for most things.
6/ within investment/finance, I'm a generalist at heart. That made me a bad hire in my first job as an options market maker for example. I frustrated my bosses by constantly looking to be involved in other aspects of the business and in other markets.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ari Paul ⛓️

Ari Paul ⛓️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AriDavidPaul

6 Apr
Crypto currently offers basically no economies of scale. I.e. with the same skills, a professional trader/investor will earn a far, far higher ROI running a smaller amount of their own money than launching a fund. /1
2/ fund management also brings it with expenses and headaches on the operational, legal, compliance, accounting, HR etc side of things. Join a fund if you want to learn, gain access to tools/platform, and moderately diversify economic exposure.
3/ launch a fund if you have the team/skills necessary (not just investing but ops, marketing etc), and want to spend 5+ years in an entrepreneurial grind to build a company.
Read 4 tweets
5 Apr
Paradox #15: Braess's paradox - adding roads may slow down traffic. This is really two separate paradoxes. /1
2/ A. empirically, people seem to target a specific work commute time. If you relieve traffic congestion, people move further away to retain the same commute time, likely because the greater distance gives them a higher quality of life in other ways, like cheaper real estate.
3/ so you could say that adding roads doesn't do anything...but in this framing it does. It may not reduce commute times, but it's still adding value to peoples' lives. Effectively those extra roads let people get cheaper rent or prettier home surroundings.
Read 6 tweets
24 Mar
The scope of regulation over anything and everything is mindboggling. 2 years ago, BlockTower held an analyst competition where we gave away $30k of BTC in prizes for the best investment analysis submitted. We had to review state by state regulation on "lotteries", and /1
2/ prohibit participation from many countries and states. This kind of thing comes up everywhere. Want to sell an NFT? Depending on how you're doing it, it falls under dozens of local and federal regulations (mostly irrelevant to individuals.)
3/ we're going to continue seeing the centralized/decentralized bifurcation as a regulatory arbitrage. The cost savings of being an "anonymous" founding team is enormous. (worth noting though, anonymity rarely lasts). Doing anything as a regulated business basically requires
Read 7 tweets
22 Mar
Are NFTs securities? No, by default. In some specific cases, yes, depending on what they are and how they're marketed. (I'm not a lawyer, may be wrong.) /1 itsartlaw.org/2019/11/19/fra….
2/ Remember the howey test? Same test applies to NFTs. Does an artist selling a work of digital art in NFT form constitute a security? Usually no. It's not an investment in a common enterprise, and generally it's not marketed with an expectation of profit.
3/ Can NFTs be securities? Sure. If a work of digital art is marketed as an investment for profit and if that profit expectation depends a third party promoter's efforts, and if the investment itself can be interpreted as in a common enterprise, than it may be a security.
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
Some thoughts on value accrual post-interoperability: we've seen many recent announcements of major defi dApps migrating or replicating themselves on all sorts of layer 1s and 2s. Will these naturally aggregate on a single shard/chain/rollup? Do layer1s benefit from activity?
2/ this comes back to the old "fat protocol" debates of 2017 and earlier. Does having a lot of, say, defi activity flowing through a layer 1 or 2 give the tokens of that layer value? Most assertions of "yes" rely on one of the following:
3/ fee burning (like EIP 1559) is one way of converting usage directly into platform token value. Thorchain has another direct approach with bonded rune value tied to TVL. Polkadot's parachain auctions are an indirect approach.
Read 8 tweets
15 Mar
Paradox #14 (bringing back this series, starting with an easy one): The friendship paradox - "most peoples' friends have more friends than they do." /1
2/ This statement is literally true, by virtue of the fact that some people have more friends than others, and those people with more friends are more likely to be selected as a point of comparison. Consider the person with 1 friend - they'll appear in a survey as
3/ one person's friend, weighing down the average # of friends' friends, for only one person. In contrast, consider someone with 2,000 friends. That person's 2000 friends end up appearing 2,000 separate times in the survey. The people with more friends are more likely to
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!