Sarah Churchwell Profile picture
Apr 17, 2021 26 tweets 10 min read Read on X
"America First" movements have been claiming to protect America's uniquely "Anglo-Saxon" identity for a century. A thread.
washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
The phrase America First was popularized in 1915, when Woodrow Wilson used it in a speech to the nativist DAR, urging that Americans subject "hyphenate" Americans (German-American, Italian-American, Irish-American) to loyalty tests.
1915 was the same year the second Klan was born, thanks largely to the popularity of The Birth of a Nation, released earlier that year, but also spurred by the lynching of Jewish Leo Frank that summer.
By the early 1920s, America First was a wildly popular slogan, used in the presidential campaigns of 1916, 1920 and 1924. Hearst frequently flew it above his masthead, including as a slogan to keep America out of the League of Nations, and to oppose labor unions.
America First was used to support the explicitly eugenicist anti-immigration bills of the early 1920s, designed to keep people of "lower stock" out of America and protect its supposed "Anglo-Saxon" identity. This speech from 1923 by no coincidence includes "the negro problem."
At exactly the same time the second Klan had been expanding. It adopted "America First" as its favorite slogan, along with "100% American" (ie, not "hyphenate"). It also didn't like "Negroes" or labor organizers. This is from a Klan march in Louisiana in 1922.
Here is a Klan recruitment ad, also from 1922, in which they make America First their slogan for the white supremacism (and Christian nationalism) they endorse.
It is also at exactly this moment that "Anglo-Saxon" emerges into the popular American conversation. If you look for "White Anglo-Saxon Protestant" in the American press before 1900, you won't easily find it, because it wasn't used.
But if you look for the first uses of "White Anglo-Saxon Protestant" in the American press in a simple search, guess who pops up with it? That's right, it's the Klan, in the early 1920s.
Google Ngram viewer shows us how the use of "Anglo-Saxon" in American discourse gradually increased over the 19th century (along with the scientific racism it supported), until it explodes in the American corpus in the 1920s.
Soon promises to protect America First and the Anglo-Saxon race from hordes of undesirable immigrants and "the negro problem" were everywhere. This is also from 1923, as anti-immigration bills were being passed.
I could go on and on; I have written and lectured about this at length. My point is simple. This is not implicit. It is not accidental. It is deliberate, clear, explicit, and a century old. Same old song, different white supremacist singing.
If you're interested in more context, I've written more about the invention of supposed "Anglo-Saxon" identities in America here. prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/white…
I've written more about the eugenicism of early 1920s anti-immigration restriction, and its associations with America First, here. nybooks.com/articles/2019/…
And finally much of this is covered in my book, Behold, America, which is a history of the phrase "America First." None of this stuff is new. None of it is subtle. Its white supremacism is real, and it is deadly serious.
If you’re interested more in how it evolved through the 30s and Lindbergh and the America First Committee of 1940-41, I write about that at length in my book, but also here nybooks.com/daily/2020/06/…
And especially here, though it’s paywalled. the-tls.co.uk/articles/the-p…
I gave a 10 min explainer video about it here for @BritishAcademy_
I wish these people would stfu so I could talk about something else, frankly. Sadly they’re gaining momentum, not losing it.
A few people have queried one of the tweets above & I realize at looking it over that I misspoke, apologies. As this has taken off, I should clarify the tweet below. “Anglo-Saxon” *per se* entered the American conversation much earlier, of course. I meant *this* pop conversation.
A few people have queried one of the tweets above and I realize at looking it over that I misspoke, apologies. As this has taken off, I should clarify. "Anglo-Saxon" *per se* in the popular American conversation is of course, much older, as I note in the Ngram tweet.
The history of "Anglo-Saxon" in America is what I wrote about in the Prospect essay I linked to, if you want clarification. Here are a few bits:
Just for sticking around, some bonus images. Here is a comparison of Anglo-Saxon race in American English and British English over the same period.
Here is America First in the 20th century, (pre Trump).
And lastly sorry for the duplicated tweet but I was having WiFi issues. Will leave it for clarity’s sake.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Churchwell

Sarah Churchwell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarahchurchwell

Jul 2
Fascism always frames itself as counter-revolutionary, and I've said for years that American fascism is no different.

I just didn't know that the revolution in question was the American Revolution.
This guy is in charge of Project 2025, aka Trump's Presidential Transition Project. He has just said their second revolution will be "bloodless if the left allows it to be."

This means they will bring serious violence if we resist them. Pay attention. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 23, 2022
Today I published a new essay on a topic - the history of what was once known as "race suicide" - I've been researching for a while, and I thought some people might be interested in some of the back story and research context. 1🧵
The editors have headlined this essay a "secret history" of abortion debates in America. It's not really secret, but it's also certainly not part of the popular understanding of abortion in the US a century ago. 2 theguardian.com/books/2022/jul…
There have been passing references to "race suicide" in several responses I've seen to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, describing it (accurately) as an early iteration of Great Replacement Theory. Most of them attribute the phrase to a eugenicist sociologist, Edward A. Ross. 3
Read 19 tweets
Jul 16, 2022
Actual announcement on actual British train: "Our card reader is not working so we can't take payments. Please do not come to the buffet car, there is no buffet service. If you're in standard, there will be an at-seat trolley service, but it won't be able to sell you anything."
Such a perfect metaphor for British life today.
I'm in First (weekend upgrade, don't @ me), where trolley service is 'complimentary.' Attendant just offered me a breakfast box, I asked what was in it. She snapped, 'I don't know, they change it every week you'll just have to take it and find out.'

Metaphors piling up.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 7, 2022
🎉🎊 Today is publication day for my new book The Wrath to Come: Gone with the Wind and the Lies America Tells. 🥳
Publication day is always dramatic for any author. It represents the culmination of many months, and often, especially with heavily researched books, years of hard work. The Wrath to Come has taken me 3 years to write.
But the publication of The Wrath to Come has been more than usually dramatic, to say the least. 😳
Read 18 tweets
Feb 14, 2022
Yesterday, my friend Prof Suzannah Lipscomb, whom many of you know as @sixteenthCgirl, was featured in a Sunday Times article, calling for a women's prize for nonfiction writing, akin to the @WomensPrize for fiction.
In the interview she calls out the "authority gap," as described by @MASieghart - that women are statistically and demonstrably less likely to be taken seriously when they speak and write than men.
In the piece, she is described as "Suzannah Lipscomb, the academic and author," and quoted saying, "People think women lack authority." The @ST_Newsroom then adds that Lipscomb is a professor emerita. Nowhere in the piece does it grant her the title "Professor."
Read 20 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.
I’d really like to understand how @BBCNews treats as an expert witness someone who literally admits without being asked that he is among the people implicated in the case. “The question is when will Giuffre be charged rather than her charging people like Prince Andrew and me.” 🤯
I am not a lawyer, so I can’t comment on the legality. But journalistically, he should not have been presented as an impartial expert witness only to say the verdict vindicates him, personally.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(