3. The article is not about "transgender people’s use of pronouns" - it is about the social norm that *other people* must comply with the demand to use non sex based pronouns.
"in other words..." 🙄
No the article does not discuss trans people's desire to assert their identity or compare it to sexual violence
Claim 4: the tribunal’s ruling was that Forstater aggressively denied the identities of people with whom she might have to work
Not true
The judgment did not say that I did anything aggressively, nor that I was aggressive.
So no that was not the "basis of the judgment" it is a smear on my character entirely made up by @guardian in order to discredit me and by extension JK Rowling.
Nor does does the judgment say "denied the identities of people with whom she might have to work".
Why not quote from the actual judgment?
Because that wouldn't work as a device to smear JK Rowling.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On March 13 2024 I made a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office about Master McCloud, a serving judge who has been engaging publicly and inappropriately in debates on sex and gender.
- She posted a list of the 9 protected characteristics from the Equality Act and highlighting that gender expression, gender identity and gender are not PCs.
She shared a link to "my body is me" by @RooneyRach