Came across a ram/scramjet review paper from the Stanford Center for Turbulence Research & it is an absolute treasure trove of wonderful illustrations related to hypersonics

A quick thread of my favorites, but first I got distracted w this simulation of scramjet combustion
Here’s a closer look at that animation, with links to the paper and YouTube source

What you’re seeing is an overlay of temperature, density gradient (analogous to schlieren), and velocity in a scramjet cavity at Mach 6.5

🎥
📄 web.stanford.edu/group/ctr/ResB…
So back to the review paper, a bunch of these figures caught my attention

First up since we’re already on scramjets, a great illustration of a combined-cycle turboramjet + dual-mode scramjet

Gets you from takeoff to Mach 10!

📄 annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114…
A schematic of the HIFiRE-2 scramjet configuration with lots of great technical specs/details
Similarly, this is the HyShot-2 cavity
On a more fundamental level, this is a great overview of the engineering/physics challenges related to hypersonic flight for air-breathing propulsion systems
A related summary for tactical boost-glide systems—notice the similarities? And the differences?
Last but certainly not least, this is an excellent figure highlighting the differences in flight profiles and trajectories of a variety of systems, from cruise missiles to ballistics to traditional LEO rocket launches

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Combs (iterative design enjoyer)

Chris Combs (iterative design enjoyer) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrChrisCombs

Feb 5
Take that CFD nerds Image
From the Anderson hypersonics book Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 14, 2023
So, if I understand correctly, it sounds like GE has successfully tested a turbine-based combined-cycle engine that incorporates: 1) gas turbine; 2) rotating detonation engine; 3) ramjet; 4) scramjet 🤯

Could in theory go from 0 to Mach 10+

Demo at full scale planned for 2024 Image
GE press release:

Some earlier reporting on the concept: geaerospace.com/press-release/…
aviationweek.com/shownews/paris…
Here's my explainer thread on turbine-based combined-cycle (TBCC) engines
Read 7 tweets
Nov 11, 2023
As we approach what may be a historic Starship flight test, this Reuters report is really, really bad

No excuses: as arguably the number one launch provider *in the world* the safety culture at SpaceX has to be better. They should be setting the standard (in a good way)

If we are going to continue giving them billions annually in taxpayer dollars, they can’t keep treating workers like disposable meat puppets


Image
And yes before you ask these numbers are much worse than industry averages Image
This is an absolutely total systematic failure that goes beyond SpaceX—NASA has some explaining to do about how they allowed SpaceX to operate in their own backyard allowing a > 20% injury rate Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 10, 2023
If you're ever frustrated by someone with a PhD acting like a know-it-all outside their niche field of study, just remember that Albert Einstein tried to design an airfoil but it performed so poorly during testing it's flight characteristics were compared to a "pregnant duck"
HT to @milan_tomicc for reminding me of this the other day
For a bit more technical insight, bottom line is that Einstein designed this entirely using Bernoulli theory.

Stall at 12deg AoA @ 92 L/D

He later confessed he was "ashamed" and "this is what can happen to a man that thinks a lot but reads little"

Read 4 tweets
Apr 21, 2023
Am I being unreasonable in thinking that "clearing the launch pad" (that everyone knew would be destroyed) is a bit of a low bar for arguably the most successful launch company *ever*?

Sorry for having higher expectations for SpaceX?

The whole thing feels half-baked and rushed
I really want SpaceX to do well

We NEED SpaceX to do well

SpaceX has a great track record of success

There are tons of insanely smart, hard-working, talented people there

NASA needs Starship to put boots on the moon

So I expect more than what we got yesterday
When some brand new startup or a university rocket club sends their rocket into a death spiral at T+4min we all pat them on the back and say "space is hard" and "you'll figure it out"

I hold SpaceX (and NASA) to a much higher standard. SpaceX is better than this. It wasn't ready
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11, 2023
WE DID IT!!!

MOO-K SEVEN

HEIFERSONIC
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WE LEARNED BUT I'M EXCITED
Some quick notes about this images: first, this is from a technique called schlieren imaging and what you are seeing are density gradients in the flow. helps to visualize shock waves, expansion fans, etc.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(