Analysing the Role of Inverted Fullbacks in the EPL this Weekend: [Thread]
Manchester United:
- Shaw - ineffective when inverted: 4/10
- Wan Bissaka - offered verticality from underlaps and created chances (plus the goal): 8/10
Spurs:
- Udogie - inversion left Son isolated at times: 5/10
- Emerson Royal - scored, and gave rise to Skipp and Kulusevski's balance on the right wing: 6/10
Erik Ten Hag is revolutionising the way Manchester United play football. This isnβt without difficulty however β Ten Hagβs approach is risky and requires substantial change. This thread explores the topic of personnel and risk vs reward when considering ETH's principles. [Thread]
There are three key facets to consider in this discussion:
- The risky nature of Ten Hagβs principles
- The quality and implementation of coaching
- The players: in terms of individual profiles and team make-up
Further, some parameters to consider when evaluating the relative success/failure of Ten Hagβs approach:
- Time it takes to implement principles
- Limiting factors (player quality & profiles, execution of principles, luck)
- What is to be considered a success
π How Erik ten Hag's Manchester United struggled against West Ham's mid-block - and what this means for the players and Ten Hag's principles of play [thread].
Manchester United and West Ham lined up as such:
West Ham sat in a 442 mid-block and looked to attack United in transitions - building attacks through hold up play and direct dribbling, before subsequent set-pieces.
United were matched player for player in build-up and progression, and struggled for inspiration.
π Using Data to Identify Areas Where Erik ten Hag Can Improve Manchester United [thread]:
Before looking at areas at United that Erik ten Hag can improve at United, it could be worth reviewing the principles of play Ten Hag has implemented as a coach at Ajax recently:
This is 100% true. Players who doubt, donβt have confidence or clarity. Theyβre susceptible to possession loss, they slow down play, theyβre less likely to execute actions well.
For me, there are three main aspects to achieving clarity:
1) understanding of system and principles
2) understanding of what youβre going to do
3) coaching/instructions from teammates
Ultimately, a system or coaching in that vein (#1) alleviates the prerogative of a player to make a decision in each given circumstance (#2).
To achieve absolute clarity and confidence in your actions, in any given state of the game (with time on the ball or under pressure, when you have multiple options or when you have no options), you need that overarching set of principles.
π The Titanic Battle Between Pep Guardiola and Diego Simeone [mini-thread]:
Atleti began in a 532 block, with City implementing their usual build-up strategies. Advantage City; over 90 minutes they would most likely have broken this block down; the progression angles are favourable and they had ultimate control in build-up.
City were able to build in their regular manner. They had an advantage over the front two, and could access most of the players in the progression chain easily, accessing their wingers.