John Bull Profile picture
Apr 23, 2021 21 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Not done a naval thread in a while so...

~~ wobbly lines ~~

1804. Straights of Malacca.

Commodore Nathanial Dance, leading the China Convoy, is about to defeat a French battle squadron using only a brig, his merchants, some paint and the most overplayed hand in naval history. Sir Nathanian Dance, sepia portrait. Old, white haired, look
So, to understand how this happens, you first have to understand the situation in 1804.

Britain and France are at war again (shocker), but this time it is going global. Because Napoleon is a very smart cookie.
Knowing Britain is super-reliant on its overseas trade, he sends out naval squadrons across the world BEFORE the war breaks out, ready to disrupt that.

Most critically, to intercept the China Convoy. 800 MILLION POUNDS (modern value) of trade, in one fleet, due to depart soon.
This catches the Royal Navy out, who have precisely zero ships in the area when Contre-Admiral Charles-Alexandre Linois, with a Ship of the Line and a lot of sexy frigates, starts causing havoc in East Asia.

It also leaves the China Convoy with a problem: sail or don't sail? Admiral Linois. Looking old, distinguished and French.
Now the convoy isn't defenceless. It includes 11 East Indiamen. Armed merchants with up to 36 guns. But they're not designed for war, just scaring pirates.

The captains don't want to sail. Corporate HQ back in London interjects:

You WILL sail. Don't worry! We found you a brig!!
Command falls to Nathaniel Dance. So armed only with the naval equivalent of a technical, he preps to sail.

Dance knows FULL WELL Linois will find him though, because:

1) Sod's law
2) Spies

So he starts planning for that. This includes buying a LOT of paint.

(Remember this) a classic technical. pickup truck with a large gun hastily s
~~ wobbly lines. Few days later ~~

We're now on board the 64 gun Ship of the Line Marengo. Adm Linois is greedily looking through le telescope at the China Convoy. Because:

1) Sod's law
2) Spies

He moves to attack then pauses.

He looks again.

Are those... Ships of the Line?
On the deck of the East Indiaman Earl Camden, is watching the French praying that his plan will work.

Because Dance is a wily old sea dog. He knows what East Indiamen look like from a distance.

Ships of the Line.

Particularly, ya know, if you PAINT THEM IN ROYAL NAVY COLOURS Repulse, an East Indiaman, painted in 1820. lots of masts. s
On the Marengo, Linois is thinking. The Royal Navy shouldn't be here. There's no WAY they can have got here in time. Right? Right?!

He thinks, then decides. His eyes must be playing tricks on him. He goes to order the attack again and...

...pauses.

Wait! What? Is that...
The Earl Camden. the same time. Dance can see the French preparing to attack. They're not biting.

Dance orders his East Indiamen to do the thing he's been drilling them rigorously to do since sailing.

The signal goes out!

"FORM LINE!" admiral pellew in hornblower looking stern
On the Marengo, Linois cancels the attack again. He decides to wait and shadow the convoy. He's not stupid. They CAN'T be Ships of the Line, surely?

He mulls it overnight. At dawn he decides.

Raise the battle standards! We attack the...

wait, WHAT NOW?!
On the Earl Camden, Dance realises this is it. He can run, disperse and he and a lot of the Indiamen will get away. But not the slower merchants. So...

ACTIVATE STAGE THREE

His Indiamen raise blue, ROYAL NAVY standards.

Form Line of Battle again.

And they charge the French. Worf shouting "today is a good day to die"
On the Marengo, a state of confusion now exists. Linois KNOWS the Navy can't be here. These MUST be merchants.

But the ship colours...

And Royal Navy standards...

And... they're ATTACKING?!

He waivers, but orders his squadron to engage. The two sides fire on each other.
ACTIVATE STAGE FOUR

This is it. Dance's final gamble. During the night he drafted every spare crewman off the other ships.

He's told them: We've PRACTICED this. Be Ships of the Line for an hour. Give me EVERYTHING for an hour. If you give me an hour, then the French will BREAK.
The East Indiamen and fighty little brig HMS Ganges, in perfect line of battle, their boosted crews firing and sailing as good as any Royal Navy vessel, engage the French Battle Squadron. Pretending to shrug off the shots tearing through them.

45 mins later. The French break. defeat of admiral linois. two lines of battle engage.
In what becomes known as the Battle of Pulo Aura, Commodore Nathanial Dance defeats and scatters Admiral Linois' French battle squadron, saving the China Convoy, with a brig and 11 East Indiamen.

In his report to Napoleon, Linois claims that Dance had EIGHT Ships of the Line.
SO WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Well, after 45 years at sea as a merchant captain, Dance suddenly finds himself able to retire. The Convoy's insurers are so grateful they grant him a pension for life, equivalent to £40k now. He's also knighted.
To his death though, he credits the bravery and resilience of the merchant crews more than himself.

"It has been my good fortune to have been enabled, by the firmness of those by whom I was supported, to perform my trust."
Linois, meanwhile, reported the failure to take the China Convoy to Napoleon. Once the truth of the force disparity came out, he defended his actions. He had been successful enough raiding elsewhere that this, combined with a dearth of alternatives, meant he retained his command.
In 1806, off the Canaries, Linois' squadron spots large sails on the horizon.

Determined not to be caught out again, Linois attacks...

...to the pleasant surprise of Admiral John Warren in HMS Foudroyant, commanding seven Ships of Line. He swiftly defeats and captures Linois. HMS London defeats the Marengo
Anyway, hope you've enjoyed this little bit of naval history, which I love because it's a brilliant example of how battles can be won by being smart with what you've got and by using your head.

And if you've enjoyed it, you can buy me a Friday beer here! ko-fi.com/garius

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bull

John Bull Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garius

Aug 11, 2023
My favourite IRL Dannatt fact:

In 1999 Major-General Dannatt was CRITICAL to stopping Wes Clark from turning the Kosovo peacekeeping into a hot war with Russia/Serbia.

As he knew when and how he was allowed to reject an order. And his commander, Gen Mike Jackson knew it. /1 🧵
It's June 1999 and a NATO peacekeeping force (KFOR) enters Kosovo under a fragile peace, brokered to end the brutal Balkans wars.

When the first recon elements reach Pristina, though, they find that a small Russian force has also crossed the border and seized the airport.
The Russians (not unfairly) believe they have been cut out of the peacekeeping. But this seizure is an attempt by rogue elements within the Russian government to either provoke an engagement, or secure concessions.

They were FM Ivanov, General Ivashov and FSB head...

...Putin. What Yeltsin’s thoughts on the matter were remains unclear. The President’s grip on power had begun to fade alongside his faculties. To various members of his government, however, it seemed that an opportunity might exist for Russia to emerge from the Kosovo war with some pride after all. Importantly, this group included Foreign Minister Ivanov, General Ivashov (the man in command of much of its southern forces ) and the increasingly influential head of the KGB’s successor organisation the FSB, Vladimir Putin.
Read 26 tweets
Aug 2, 2023
I'll NEVER tire of the fact that Uber were so desperate to avoid giving drivers sick days in the UK that they accidentally convinced a tribunal they were a cab firm.

That made them VAT liable.

Wrote back in 2019 that HMRC would nail them to the wall: https://t.co/8cyywu7ZfSlondonreconnections.com/2019/schroding…
Uber remains the textbook case of a tech unicorn assuming American corporate law, lobbying and culture can just apply everywhere.

And thus getting UTTERLY undone by not making even the tiniest changes to adapt to a local political and legal market.
The MOMENT they submitted themselves to an employment law case where the Duck Test would be applied under English law, they were fucked.

The moment the tribunal wrote this in their ruling, you could practically SEE HMRC rising, meerkat like, from the savannah. Any organisation (a) running an enterprise at the heart of which is the function of carrying people in motor cars from where they are to where they want to be and (b) operating in part through a company discharging the regulated responsibilities of a PHV operator, but (c) requiring drivers and passengers to agree, as a matter of contract that it does not provide transportation services (through UBV or ULL) and (d) resorting in its documentation to fictions, twisted language and even brand new terminology, merits we think a degree of scepticism.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 29, 2023
Obscure autobiography arrived yesterday. Been trying to hunt down a copy of for years.

Tiny volume. Person who thinks he's unimportant. Arguably helped save thousands of Jews in WW2.

As is always the case, doesn't credit himself. Blames himself for not somehow saving more.
Flicking through it now and it's heartbreaking. As with Smallbones' papers or Mary Burchill's writings, just good people who stood up, but then cannot forever escape the guilt of thinking they could have done more than they did.

Even as they were doing more than anyone else.
We have a tendency to see 'heroes' as larger than life, and I hate it.

Nearly always they are just regular people who decide they will not accept what is happening, and who they're told to hate, and do what they can.

They just decide to be kind.

And they're haunted by it.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 25, 2023
To understand Musk's renewed obsession with X and focus on financial services, you REALLY need to understand the X/Confinity merger that became PayPal.

And, particularly, the Peter Thiel-led coup that kicked Musk out as CEO/Chief Strategist.

Here's how that happened. 1/🧵
In early 2000, X hits the news for a vulnerability that allows money to be moved between accounts with just account details. This is fixed, but spooks investors.

Elon agrees with investor Mike Moritz from Sequoia to become CTO while Bill Harris (ex-Intuit) becomes CEO.
Meanwhile, over the road (literally), a startup called Confinity is making waves. It's funded by Peter Thiel, who is also its CEO, but is the brainchild of Ukrainian Max Levchin its CTO.

Backed by Nokia, Confinity is making a way to 'beam' money between PalmPilots by infrared.
Read 31 tweets
Jul 24, 2023
Thread on history of X dot com and Melon Husk will have to wait until tomorrow as need to stream.

But in the meantime here is a quick story called:

That Time Elon Totalled his McLaren F1 While Trying to Show Off in Front of Peter Thiel 🧵/1 a very totalled mclaren F1
Year 2000. X and PayPal are fighting over the pay-by-email market. Both are burning cash so fast that a merger becomes inevitable (I'll cover all this in tomorrow's thread).

Musk (X) is REALLY not happy about this. He wants to WIN. Thiel (PayPal) is happy. He HAS won.
Thiel saw the writing on the wall, as did Bill Harris (formerly of Intuit) - X's CEO after Elon (biggest investor) stepped back to CTO . They have created this merger to save both companies and make lots of money. Harris has bullied Elon into it by threatening to quit otherwise.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 9, 2023
I'm old enough to remember when the Rail Delivery Group insisted that Oyster Cards were the spawn of Satan.

They've never deliberately made one pro-passenger ticketing decision in their ENTIRE existence.

Best to assume, with ticket office closures, that this is still true.
If you're wondering why the RDG (or ATOC as it was then. They rebrand whenever the brand becomes toxic for being anti-pax) hated Oyster, it was because IT HELPED PEOPLE PAY THE RIGHT FARE.

The operators make a fortune, every year, from people overpaying for tickets.
This is why smartcard rollout is still shite outside London. There's zero financial benefit to the government or the TOCs in easy, transparent ticketing.

The only person who benefits from that is the passenger, and they aren't shareholders.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(