Some of these outlets were listed as national security threats by the @StateDept last summer. How did every single one of these adtech companies miss this?
The answer is simple: they genuinely have no fucking idea what they're doing.
Problem is, their technology is incredibly limited. In fact, it's useless against most disinformation efforts.
Second, the men running adtech co's (and in charge of dispensing your ad spend) are openly ignorant of what disinformation is.
It's like they've never cracked open a book or watched a @BostonJoan talk. 🤔
Finally, the @wfamarketers - a powerful interest group for advertisers - has never bothered to include disinformation on their list of bad things they don't want their ads on.
How are you going to keep your ads off of disinfo if you can't even figure out a definition❓
Btw, the @4As has an EXCELLENT definition of disinformation + misinformation sitting on its website.
The work has been done. We can use this. What's the hold up at @wfamarketers? How long are we out to lunch?
My gut tells me that GARM hasn't adopted this definition of disinformation because its members believe that disinformation and "fake news" is a matter of bias, opinions & free speech.
I'm sorry to say that is foolish and ignorant. They need to read a book too.
If we are going to stamp out disinformation from our ad buys, we're going to need to establish a working definition in this industry ASAP. Until then, we will be sponsoring all this by default:
Here's the scoop: Google has been pushing a new shiny AI product called Performance Max on its clients.
PMax runs ads & auto-optimizes for you. But it doesn't let you control your ads at all — not even to *exclude* your ads from key categories, like YouTube for Kids.
On the other hand, PMax doesn't filter out ads for YouTube for Kids either.
So in between videos titled "Can you name these vegetables?" kids have been watching ads featuring car accidents, violent explosions and people drowning.
In Jan. 2023, The Donald started running ads through an ad network called "Publir."
Turns out Publir's co-founder is (was?) the co-owner and CTO of RealClearPolitics. He was running both companies at the same time — and maybe still is.
At first, I thought Publir might be his own independent business or side hustle. His LinkedIn says he launched the company in 2021 after leaving RealClear in 2020.
But as I dug in, I realized that this is not the case at all.
HOLY SHIT. @WSJ is reporting that ~80% of the ads @YouTube serves across the web have violated their own terms of service — and are therefore subject to refunds.
This is...a devastatingly huge deal. @GoogleAds is about to be out billions of $$.
Google has never been weaker than it is RIGHT now. Their search ads business - their main source of $$ - has been tanking since ChatGPT. They're facing 2 antitrust lawsuits.
Now, turns out they've been caught in a multi-billion dollar scam?? Oh my god.
Let me explain the scam itself:
Advertisers pay YouTube good money to run their ads on before or after a YouTube video, on the YouTube platform.
But sometimes, YouTube runs these ads videos embedded on 3rd party websites, like you see here:
TheDonald is WAY too toxic to be running ads. So how is happening?
An adtech middleman called Publir (@publirllc) — which has connected them to every major ad exchange by hiding TheDonald under various fake names & accounts.