Early Bronze Age Greece (~3200-2600 BC) was mostly EEF in ancestry with a significant amount of CHG ancestry from Anatolian migrants. Indo-European invaders who were ~50% PIE/Steppe in ancestry invaded Greece in mid-Bronze Age ~2600-2000 BC. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
the two pre-IE men from Greece in the early Bronze Age had Y-haplogroups of J2a (most commonly found in Georgia) and an uncommon branch of G2. isogg.org/tree/2011/ISOG…
The peoples of the Aegean of the early Bronze Age 3200-2600 were (relatively) homogenous in ancestry - mostly EEF with a significant amount of CHG ancestry. See the admixture graph under "Greece & Cyprus EMBA" - brown is EEF, cyan is CHG.
Unlike Balkans & rest of Europe, Greece & Anatolia didn't see a WHG Resurgence in Neolithic by 4000 BC. Instead there is small increase in CHG ancestry in 3000s BC. There is a large increase in CHG ancestry in Early Bronze Age 3200-2600 BC - 25% of ancestry.
Indo-European invaded Greece at some point between 2600 and 2000 BC. They mixed with their local predecessors in most areas, including the islands. Minoan areas resisted the IE invasion.
The Indo-Europeans who invaded Greece were probably from the Balkans. Anatolia has little genetic trace of Indo-European penetration in 3rd millennium BC, & the IE mid-Bronze Age samples in Greece have a lot more steppe ancestry than W Mediterranean IEs.
Myceneans of the Peloponnese in late Bronze Age had their IE ancestry diluted by mixing with local Minoan-like people. They were roughly 1/3 proto-Greek (if Logkas people were proto-Greeks) and 2/3 Minoan in ancestry.
Modern Greeks most are most closely related to the people of Logkas (northern Greece) of the Middle Bronze Age. My guess is this due Mycenean expanding increasing CHG & EEF, while Slavic invasions in Middle Ages decreased those & increased IE ancestry - not continuity from Logkas
From another paper on small increase in CHG ancestry in Greece in neolithic & major increase in CHG ancestry in early Bronze Age Greece:
I'd guess that the shift from Greek neolithic to Greek Early Bronze Age around 3200 BC involved large scale population replacement. Chalcolithic Anatolians didn't have much more CHG ancestry that Early Bronze Age Greeks did, & they are most likely source for the CHG ancestry...
Also note the proto-Hittite with Indo-European/steppe ancestry in Copper Age Anatolia (Gold is the steppe component color in this graph) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumtepe
In line with archaeology, western & central Iberia were populated by hunter-gatherers distinctive from those on Mediterranean coast by their higher Magdalenian ancestry. Those hunter-gatherers had a resurgence over the EEFs as elsewhere during neolithic.
Steppe ancestry in IEs was diluted by the time that they reached SW Iberia at end of third millennium, in line with other studies. However, there are signs of an Eastern Mediterranean migration to Iberia in Bronze Age or earlier:
There was substantial migration to urban areas in Portugal during the Roman period from Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. If these samples are representative, about half of the urban population was foreign-derived. Date of the site isn't provided, but was after 100 BC.
Safavids were, like Ottomans, born in obscurity in chaos of mid-13th century Mongol invasions - although as Sufi order rather than as tribal migration. Contrary to later propaganda, Sheikh Safi was not a sayyid or from a Shia background, but he became prominent in a Shia milieu.
Safavid Order had a waqf (charitable endowment) for its benefit by 1305 in Ardabil. Its network of followers expanded in Anatolia, Khorasan, & Mazandaran under aegis of Ilkhanate & some of its successors, but was forced to arm some of its supporters in at least Ardabil.
Timur, the greatest mystic of his era, liked the Safavid Order & granted it additional lands to financially sustain its missionary efforts. However, the Order was squeezed by his sons, who desires to centralize power in the realm.
Thread with excerpts from "Hezbollah: A Short History" by Augustus Richard Norton
Shia birthrates in mid-20th century Lebanon were higher than those of Sunnis & Christians.
from 1950s to 1970s Lebanese Shia typically supported secular parties led by Christians - whether rightist or leftist. Growth of armed Palestinian formations in Lebanon in 1970s drove formation of both coalitional & oppositional Shia organizations.
Thread with excerpts from "Revolutionary Iran: A History of the Islamic Republic" by Michael Axworthy
one reason to find the Iranian Revolution interesting is that it proceeded to follow a non-Western path of development, much like India & China, rather than following the Western path.
Iranian Shia Islam is a more organized & disciplined force than Sunni Islam in most of the rest of the world as the result of an enduring clerical hierarchy (the Sunni Caliphate was dissolved in 1924).