Good news or is it on NOX canisters?
At last TH Council has done something about the little silver canisters that litter our streets & are often linked to anti-social behaviour
But why did it take so long & why it may have little impact & why TH is so frustrating?
A new PSPO 1/
Public Space Protection Order was approved on Wednesday by the Mayor, it will ban the use of NOX nitrous oxide that people inhale via balloons from the canisters
It provides a short high so users have to keep inhaling more of them (& then for some reason do not pick them up) 2/
But NOX does have some negative health impacts talktofrank.com/drug/nitrous-o…
& some of those who use NOX also cause anti-social behaviour, cause loud noise etc & a few have been violent when asked to keep the noise down
There is no need for it to be inhaled close to peoples homes
3/
NOX is currently not illegal to use (also used in food preparation) so the Police have no formal powers to stop their use
But as Lambeth did in July 2015 (6 years ago!) Councils do have the power to introduce Public Space Protection Orders to deal with specific ASB problems 4/
So in September 2018 @going4golds & I using our then new ability to debate certain issues ask the Council to copy Lambeth & introduce a PSPO to ban NOX use, see Item 8 democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/ieListDocument…
Last pic with red is Labour amendment who say they will consider
Nothing happened 5/
364 days later in September 2019 Cllr Golds & I raise another motion after Residents Survey shows ASB now number 1 concern of residents, Item 8 democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/ieListDocument…
We ask again for improvements on ASB & remind Council of previous motion in 2018
Not much happens 6/
But behind the scenes a number of Council officers who used to work at Lambeth moved here
Then in response to PSPO on responsible drinking a number of people suggested extending it to NOX (I suggested this to residents at the time & did as well)
Then last September TH 7/
street cleaning teams were asked to record where they found NOX canisters (see 1st map but note where NOX left in private areas not recorded)
As you can see a big problem = evidence required to justify a PSPO + correlation with Police ASB report locations as well 2nd map 8/
Then a consultation earlier this year resulted in 948 responses, one of the highest responses ever to a Council consultation (thanks to those who completed it)
So clear evidence to support a ban on NOX canisters
Will start as soon as signs can be put up warning users 9/
“Person(s) within the Restricted Area will not:
Ingest, inhale, inject, smoke, possess or otherwise use psychoactive substances (e.g. nitrous oxide) and which is causing or likely to cause harassment, alarm, distress, nuisance or annoyance to members of the public”
Note ‘and’
10
This only applies in public areas
So if you do this in your own home or do not cause any impacts to public then this ban will have no impact
So why may it have little impact?
See answer below to my 2nd question
Most Police Officers won’t even be told about their new powers! 11/
Most Police officers to be told about new powers rarely work nights
So when Police respond (maybe) to a late night call about a group of noisy young men inhaling NOX they won’t be able to issue or threaten the use of Fixed Penalty Notices if NOX users do not stop
12/
The whole point of the PSPO is to move the usually late night NOX parties away from residential areas to other areas where residents are not trying to sleep
(most NOX use is by young men in cars, they can easily drive elsewhere to industrial parks, shopping centre car parks)
13/
So some positive action which could have happened in 2015 took TH Council until April 2021 to action despite it being an issue of rising concern for years
But then most Police officers working nights wont be using the new powers or even know about them!
Police do 2 year shifts
14
& they only have to be told how to issue a Fixed Penalty Notice
Cabinet meeting where this was approved was also very interesting & frustrating (I switched off as not happy with comments except for those from the Mayor)
See from 48 minutes 50 seconds in towerhamlets.public-i.tv/core/portal/we…
15
But in report this interesting map showing heat map of reported ASB from last September
Why are Cllrs in worst areas not doing more?
Also why not a higher political priority then liveable streets when you look also at Residents Survey results from 2019 about top concerns? 16/
This @TheEconomist article is very strange, odd & not really based on much evidence
It also repeats various myths without evidence, misses the big issues, and therefore comes to the wrong conclusions
A 🧵on its inaccuracies
a. no mention of leasehold or commonhold at all ! 1/
b. it correctly says these buildings are expensive which is true but then talks about land value in England as one main reason why tall towers in big cities are expensive
Economist article in black, my comments in red
The main reason why tall towers are expensive is 2/
because construction is v expensive
As evidence this agreement that Westferry Printworks could only deliver 21% affordable housing on a big site agreed by the developer, Tower Hamlets Council & the GLA
Construction costs £630 m
v
Land value £28m
v
Taxes (CIL & s106) = £49 m 3/
The issues are more extensive than @PlanningMag article states
Councillors who made the decision to reject the resident's Yes vote in favour of the business No vote
Incorrectly, used the wrong business turnout % to suggest a higher proportion of businesses voted than residents 1/
Proportionally more residents voted than businesses
Councillors were also not officially told that:
Some of the business votes were illegal (three people voted more than twice)
49.5% of all the business vote came from a single office building
Cllrs also not told that there was
2/
an active Police investigation underway
"amid suspicions of a “possible conspiracy to subvert the referendum”, allegation of multiple voting, and claims that some business owners had exerted “undue influence” to sway the vote against the council’s plan" standard.co.uk/news/london/po…
3/
Problems with Homes of Multiple Occupation (HMO) & why a man died due to Council inaction
A man died earlier this month in a flat fire, had the Council been more proactive and responsive he might still be alive but an attempt to get them to do so in January 2021 was rejected 1/
18 people, primarily students and delivery couriers from Bangladesh, lived in a 2-bedroom former Council flat at the time of the fire, 22 beds were seen in the property including in the kitchen (mainly bunk beds)
2/
The owner had bought the leasehold flat in 2005 but the freeholder was Tower Hamlets Council and the managing agent Tower Hamlets Homes, their arm's length management agency
Neighbours made complaints about number of people & leaks from the bathroom in late 2021 and 2022
3/
New independent private primary school in Canary Wharf planning application
CW Group has applied to build a new 9-storey (thin but tall) nursery and primary school in the middle of Wood Wharf
402 pupils (150 nursery pupils and 252 primary school pupils) and 80 FTE staff 1/
Summary here constructing-london.com/wood-wharf-sch…
This would be a fee-paying school separate from the Mulberry Primary state school already built opposite this proposed new school so there would be 2 schools on site
2/
It will be run by inspiredlearninggroup.co.uk/about-us/about… and would be the 3rd private school in the area including River House & Faraday
I assume CW Group are behind the idea of building a new private school as will generate a long run income and be popular with some of their new residents
3/
Local Plan consultation response - why the Local Plan needs to change
1st round of consultations on the new Local Plan ended on Wednesday - 2nd round of consultation should be later this year after they publish the draft policies
I wrote a 13 page response to it raising some 1/
of some of my issues with it & planning here in general
Fundamentally the objective of recent London and Local Plans has been to push most development in Tower Hamlets to Aldgate, Aberfeldy, Isle of Dogs including Blackwall & other parts of Poplar 2/
Development in most of the rest of Tower Hamlets is discouraged even when they have better transport links and better infrastructure than the growth areas listed above 3/
I went to the @ConHome Defence & Security Conference today
Several questions from audience about what will happen in Ukraine
All those who answered said, they don't know the outcome
That assumes Britain has a passive role
Britain could determine the outcome by helping Ukraine 1/
More western weapons would put Ukraine in a stronger position to win
(in the same way western support helped USSR defeat Nazi Germany) @BWallaceMP mentioned 250 vehicles sent by Britain
But Ukrainians crowdfunded to buy 101 ex-British Army armoured
vehicles themselves
(Ukrainians in UK find this harder to do as UK donation websites won't allow similar campaigns in the UK to buy 'weapons')
That we had 101 retired armoured vehicles incl. ambulances ready to go but were on the open market for sale suggests Britain not as
3/