An interview with Armenian national hero and third president Serzh Sargsyan has premiered. It promises to be a good one.
Sargsyan says he didn't lose to "these guys [Pashinyan], I lost to much more powerful forces."
Sargsyan says that the infamous line, "Nikol Pashinyan was right, I was wrong," was a reference to Sargsyan being wrong that Pashinyan wouldn't have risked the lives of others and that Pashinyan was right that he would indeed do anything to achieve his end: power.
"Why wasn't Karen Karapetyan nominated from the get-go to replace you?"

Sargsyan: we agreed that it would be best that we continue with me as primary negotiator re: Artsakh as PM and he remains in his position essentially running the economy; Karapetyan agreed.
Sargsyan says Karapetyan asked him to remove laudatory statements about him (Karapetyan) in his resignation text; Sargsyan acquiesced.
Sargsyan saying he continues to hold Karapetyan in high esteem, contradicting rumors that have circulated that Karapetyan was in cahoots with Pashinyan.
Sargsyan says that he was not ready to use force and for people to die in order for him to hold onto power.
"These past three years, all they [Pashinyan and his government] have done is destroy." - Serzh Sargsyan
Sargsyan says, "You must be responsible for your actions: your good actions and your bad actions. Aren't people going to ask how we lost over 70% of the second Armenian republic? Aren't people going to ask how we lost so many lives?"
Sargsyan: "Irresponsible people are the most dangerous."
"In the April War, we lost 75 soldiers who fought valiantly and lost 400 hectares and we were responsible for that but they lost [a majority of Artsakh] and 5000 lives and they're not responsible?"

This is an allusion to Pashinyan's unwillingness to take responsibility.
"Armen Sargsyan, why? Why did he become president?"

Serzh Sargsyan, "He had the capability and knowledge, according to me...but, as they say, nobody is perfect...a person's essence appears in times of crisis...Armen Sargsyan wasn't able to distinguish himself. It's a shame."
Serzh Sargsyan being very critical of Armen Sargsyan for not using the powers endowed to him by the Constitution of Armenia to oppose Pashinyan at several junctures.
About the rumor that Armen Sargsyan is a British citizen, Serzh Sargsyan says that he asked and Armen Sargsyan said he didn't have it.
On the question of Soros and its affiliates, he says that Open Society Foundations was established in Armenia in 1997.

He rejects the idea that Soros *organized* the coup in 2018. He again references "more powerful forces" that had the technological ability to conduct the coup.
"Why didn't you ask for help from Russia?"

Serzh Sargsyan, "It never crossed my mind to ask our strategic partner for help to hold onto power."
Sargsyan: "I asked for weapons [from Russia] and they were provided; I asked for loans and they were provided; I asked for economic assistance and it was provided. But it would be dishonorable for me to ask for help to keep power."
Sargsyan: "If we organized snap elections, it may have devolved into a civil war given the circumstances at the time [April 2018]."
Sargsyan: "People would have blamed us if a civil war started - they blame us now for allow Nikol to come to power. Fine, we accept responsibility. Let us be guilty. But let people wake up and realize what's happening."
"We wanted the Artsakh issue to be resolved peacefully, without a war; that Artsakh's status be determined by the people of Artsakh; and, yes, we were ready for concessions but that Artsakh's people decide. We wanted the UN to recognize the rights of the people to do this."
"What were we ready to give to them? In exchange for peace and our conditions, five regions were supposed to be given to Azerbaijan while Karvajar (Kelbajar) and Berdzor (Lachin) would be left until the rest of the plan was implemented...Shushi was never on the table."
"The agreement would have to be signed by all parties as well as the UN Security Council."
"Mr. President, do you feel guilty? Do you feel guilty that Nikol was able to come to power and that a generation of young men was lost?"

"Yes. Yes, I feel guilty."
"Are there foreign spies in Armenia today?"

"I don't know...but those spies you're asking about is what they looked like 20-30 years ago, not what they look like today. Someone can serve foreign interests simply through their stupidity."
"Is Nikol permanent?"

"I am sure you're aware of the story of Solomon and the story of the inscription on the inside of the ring that reads, "this too shall pass away." We need to be wise and patient. This too shall pass. For me, Armenia is permanent - and good work."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with William Bairamian

William Bairamian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bairamian

29 Apr
Many Diasporans won't see the problem with this because it's become so normalized in the West but the production of cannabis is going to be disastrous for Armenian society. And, for the record, I don't find the economic argument compelling.
OK, obviously some context is necessary given the replies I've been getting here. The reason this is disastrous for Armenia is that this is the first step in realizing the stated objective of this government's officials that marijuana be legalized.
This wouldn't be unusual as the reluctance to legalize hemp production in other places has largely been tied to the expectation that this would eventually lead to marijuana production/legalization. Also, hemp production makes illegal marijuana production hard to enforce.
Read 8 tweets
21 Jul 20
I just watched the @res_publica The Future of Post-liberalism seminar with @Phillip_Blond, @PatrickDeneen, @Vermeullarmine, Ryszard Legutko, @NJ_Timothy, and @moveincircles as moderator. I recommend watching it in full but here are some highlights.

First, #postliberalism is a new idea and this was a good intro/discussion about where it should go. I discerned two camps: international post-liberalism represented by @Phillip_Blond, @Vermeullarmine, and @PatrickDeneen and a national kind represented by Legutko and @NJ_Timothy.
The case for international #postliberalism was made early on and succinctly by @Phillip_Blond: post-liberal universalism is needed to respond to liberal universalism. I agree with this b/c liberalism been successful and difficult to challenge due to its insistence on ubiquity.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!