Mencius Moldbug is dismissive of the idea of replacing rule by a King with rule by a smart contract, he calls it a "Quantum Exponential leap".

Here's why I think he's wrong:

First of all, you can see the whole section from @kaschuta's show here (skip to 1:11:18):

The criticism is two-pronged:

(1) We don't have the technology to use smart contracts to make real-world decisions and blockchain tech is slow and expensive, and you would also need AI tech that we don't have because it's AI-complete.
(2) You can't rule the world with set of rules or laws because there are always exceptions, or because humans can't have emotional connections with computers, or because it's necessary for humans to follow orders from other humans.
(3) Actually there's a third prong: a smart contract of some kind can't enforce its will unless you give it cryptographic control over weapons (which would be bad, because it could lead to Skynet)
So, what's the response?

Prong (1) is wrong because Moldbug is a bit behind the times on technology. People in modern AI don't talk about "AI-complete" any more, it's an artifact from the 90s and modern state-of-the-art systems don't exhibit this "completeness" property...
GPT-3 can write poetry without being able to fold laundry, Alphastar can play pro-level Starcraft without being able to write poems, etc. AI is moving forward quite rapidly with strong narrow capabilities but for the foreseeable future there probably won't be a "general" ...
... AI system that can solve arbitrary problems. Instead, we have capable systems in various domains with gradually broadening abilities. AI is going "Depth first" rather than "breadth first" through problem-space.
I think a lot of people on the bird site don't understand just how fast AI is moving, you can play around with the openAI blog to see what it's capable of.

For example, DALL-E:
You can literally tell the AI to draw a picture of an avocado wearing a helmet walking a dog, and it will produce that picture for you. This AI has mastered the mapping between words and pictures.
On the blockchain side, there are a lot of people working hard to make blockchain tech better along multiple axes. I can't explain all that tech in a twitter thread, but what we have now is not what we will have in 10 or 20 years.
So, prong (2) "You can't rule the world with set of rules or laws because there are always exceptions"

We already rule the online world with rules and have ways to escalate exceptions. Try posting hardcore porn on twitter or facebook, an AI is almost certainly scanning for it.
"You can't do that!"

But it's already happening. Copyright on Youtube, porn on social networks, etc.

OK, you can have some rough-and-ready rules, but how do the exceptional cases get decided? One approach to this is economic: people can vote with their wallets.
Augur's Oracle works like this: a question is submitted to holders of the REP token, if they disagree they can keep escalating, if there is disagreement at the highest level, then REP forks into two chains. The idea is that the fork that chose the more accurate answer ...
... will hold more value long-term, because an inaccurate court or oracle is worth less than an accurate one.

This kind of economic solution wouldn't work in a global totalitarian dictatorship, but in a multipolar world where no single lie has a crushing advantage, it works.
The word in 100 years is going to be mostly an online world. People will willingly "plug into the matrix", but what that matrix is like matters a lot. And everything that matters will be decided by some kind of moderation system.
Social networks are already governed by content moderation systems, and as we move forward these social networks are gradually going to become everything that matters. The Pandemic accelerated this, but it was going to happen anyway.
Moderation and promotion aren't only downstream of power. They are also upstream of it. The entity that controls the censorship and promotion functions can isolate all its opponents from each other and unite its supporters. Youtube will start hiding dislikes, for example.
We also know that YouTube deliberately suppresses certain videos - limits or throttles the number of shares, views or recommendations.
Given that government by algorithm is already happening, I don't think it's something you can ignore. shape that future, or not.

The difference I am looking to shape is opaque backroom dealings versus transparent crypto contracts.
The refutation of the third prong follows from this. As humans put more and more of what matters online, you don't need a terminator or a killbot to enforce the rules. Yes, we will eventually have police killbots (or stunbots) that use violence to make people physically comply.
But most human activity will end up online anyway. People will plug in, people will upload themselves, etc, and even if they do stay in meatspace, almost everything will get decided by algorithms.
Onto some objections: "humans have interests and those interests will creep into whatever system you make"

Yes, people have interests and power will try to creep into whatever system you make. But blockchain is building systems that are designed to be censorship-resistant and transparent.

"Science", "Experts", "Independent Press", "Rule of Law" are all aging institutions.
Old-fashioned institutions where things get decided through informal channels and laundered in committees lead to oppression. The Woke problem in modern institutions is a manifestation of this, but it's not the only one. It's just a special case.
Of course there is a reflexive midwit anti-crypto/anti-blockchain sentiment about. It will age as well as the "world market for maybe five computers" sentiment.
Crypto/blockchain is a new technology and it's full of scams, most people can't separate the wheat from the chaff so it's understandable that there will be a lot of fakery and skepticism now.

But my job is to see clearly through that stuff. The future of power is digital.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Roko -

Roko - Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RokoMijicUK

30 Apr
Just to give you all some idea of how insanely early we still are in crypto and how dumb the mainstream is, read this from PayPal:โ€ฆ
Paypal is offering customers Ethereum and 3 different types of digital pet rock.

> "Bitcoin Cash: created in 2017, the group behind Bitcoin Cash say transaction times are faster than the original Bitcoin."
> "Litecoin: designed to be a future payment method and can be mined more quickly than Bitcoin - producing one new coin every 2.5 minutes (whereas Bitcoin produces one every 10 minutes)."
Read 4 tweets
29 Apr
Mighty App wants to lobotomize your computer, i.e. everyone has a thin-client and absolutely everything happens on a server somewhere, you just see a stream of pixels.

Is this a good thing? There are some pros and cons.

- it's very inefficient to have ordinary people doing computer admin, a centralized service could make everything work well.
- a centralized server can have better hardware, such as GPUs or more RAM that can be utilized more efficiently via timesharing.

- a centralized service will probably deliver a worse experience to users because of moat/monopoly effects. For example, you get unskippable adverts playing on your screen unless you upgrade to the super-premium plan.
Read 8 tweets
29 Apr
Toxic femininity? Mental illness at scale? Lunatics running the asylum?
Other options:

- Nth Wave Feminism
- Your grandfather died at Omaha Beach for this

(more suggestions in the comments please)
Personally I like "Mental illness at scale", thanks to @micsolana.
Read 5 tweets
29 Apr
The bigger problem with "everything is just a coordination problem" is that social status is inherently a zero-sum game.

The people who win by making everyone miserable are getting the best deal they can ever get.

Of course status isn't everything.
The upside here is that selfish evildoers usually find it hard to cooperate with each other.

Various successful instances of evil have solved this in various ways.

Wokeism, for example, generates cooperation via signalling rather than via aligned interests.
The Italian Mafia solved it via family ties and culture (genetic loyalty).

The Bolsheviks used Bioleninism (loyalty via dysfunction)
Read 5 tweets
27 Apr
I have a problem with retail trading platforms like @Binance and @FTX_Official.

They make it really inconvenient to manage a portfolio.

Let's say I have $1000 invested in 20 different coins on Binance, and I want to do an across-the-board 10% take-profit to cash...
Ugh so inconvenient! It takes many, many clicks to do this for just one coin.

First you need to select that coin, then you need to work out 10% by hand, then you need to set it to "market" by hand (and if you forget, you'll set a random limit order that's annoying to cancel)...
Now repeat that 20 times. Ugh, you'd spend 45 minutes accomplishing this. Not to mention the constant hassle of logging on (captcha, password, TOTP).

And if you want to set limit orders... oh my god. I don't want one single limit order. I want a whole range of them.
Read 5 tweets
25 Apr
It has come to my attention that people are spreading false rumors about me.

What to do? Many of these people are kind of insane and giving them attention would validate their insanity.

On the other hand, there's something I can clear up pretty easily.
I have written evidence showing exactly what the source of these rumors is and I can post it.

Anyone got any experience with this?
Maybe I should just spill it:

๐๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ฌ๐š๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ˆ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐š๐ง ๐„๐€ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐›๐ž๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š "๐ฌ๐ž๐ฑ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!