They know full well it’s not women’s choice. Lol sexbuyers admitting what “sex workers’ rights” advocates will not 🤭
Note the dehumanization: not “asylum-seeker” as in the person but “asylum-seeker pussy” as in the body part. That’s how men who buy sex view women.
Racism. That’s how men who buy sex view various ethnicities. And funny thing, if it’s a service being bought and not the body, why does skin color matter to these guys? 🤔
More racism. Double dose of antiblackness and misogyny.
They know how poorly the women are treated. Do they care? No.
More racism.
Again why prostitution is paid rape: commercial sex violates enthusiastic consent. An emotional state can’t be purchased, desire can’t be commodified.
Again, no enthusiastic consent. The buyers know full well that they are not wanted, that the women don’t want them or like the encounter, that they’re uncomfortable at best and in pain at worst. Compensated sexual abuse.
@EllyArrow featured this one in her video on four types of sexbuyers. Rapists, all of them. Her body, his choice.
Note the dehumanization? The entire point of the sex industry, of buying sexual favors, IS sexual objectification. Paying to use someone else’s body as a tool to masturbate into isn’t just like buying a fucking coffee 😒
Wow what a saint. Pushing the sex trade as ~women doing what they want with their bodies~ is even more ridiculous than defending the slave trade as black people doing what they want with their labor. It’s all built on coercion and satisfying the wants of others.
Exactly, it’s their job genius. Their life literally depends on putting on the happy face and giving a pleasing performance.
You CHOOSE to spend your money this way bro, no one forced you 🤷🏾♀️
The buyers love the violence.
Aww poor babies. Feeling sad after paying to rape vulnerable women? Get me the world’s smallest violin 🎻
See how her body is described? That’s absolutely what’s up for sale. Which other workers have their ass and breasts ranked and rated on a ~professional~ forum like this?
Fetishization. Putting a class of women at the disposal of men, whose job it is to satisfy their sexual fantasies, only encourages these mentalities.
Notice the lack of empathy.
Again, buyers being more honest than the lobbyists who defend them. They know it’s not their choice. They know they don’t get choice. They acknowledge economic coercion.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alright, I finished reading the Clara Zetkin “Only in Conjunction With the Proletarian Woman Will Socialism Be Victorious” speech and I have highlighted a few parts to criticize.
As a woman yourself, you’re not demanding the political equality of women “for the sake of a principle”, the principle, that women should be equal to men? Women’s liberation is a worthy cause in and of itself and not merely a carrot to dangle for the sake of “greater” goals. 🙄
You are speaking as both, is “woman” and “party comrade” mutually exclusive? Basic intersectionality. Do women have to reject our womanhood to be taken seriously? And is that a future you will persuade women to help conquer? Maybe I’m reading too much into this.
Certain radfems don’t seem to get (or even want to get) that straight and bi women aren’t free to talk about and express opposite sex attraction even while heterosexuality is compulsory under patriarchy.
Keeping intersectionality in mind makes it clear. Yes, heteronormativity and het (passing) privilege are real, but at the same time misogyny leaves no women free to enjoy sexuality. It’s all put to the service of men in some way (str8 = fuck fodder, bi = 3sum, les = porn)
Like how men demean women as airheaded b*mbos while also demanding femininity, men degrade women for desiring/fucking them while pressuring women to do exactly that. Hence why “wh*re” and similar terms are insults. Women can never win, that’s how patriarchy works.
To be *gender* critical is to be critical of “gender” as a concept. Meaning gender in its entirety, including identity as well as stereotypes and roles. It’s not *transgender* critical or gender *identity* critical. I will say this as much as it needs to be said.
Ironic. Aren’t GCs supposed to be the ones saying that words mean something? This one does too. The term “gender critical” came about as a way to describe radical feminist views on gender and denote people who may agree on that but not other aspects of radical feminism.
If you are not also scrutinizing the sexism in society driving a lot of and even enabling this trans identification to begin with, then you are not criticizing gender. The entire basis of radical feminists and friends opposing this movement is the misogyny that it reinforces.