In this thread I will post males in dresses. The reason is to annoy people (I don't have a specific person in mind) who claim to be gender critical, but they are not.
2/
Based on the information I have, the examples presented in this thread are not related to transvestitism, fetishism or autogynephilia. They are simply fashion statements. If those photographs annoy you, it might mean you are not really gender critical.
3/
*males in dresses/skirts/… etc.
4/
5/
6/
7/
8/
9/
10/
11/
12/
13/
14/
15/
16/
17/
18/
19/
20/
21/
22/
23/
24/
25/
26/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will talk about this topic again, because I think it is important. There are people who are not gender critical, but who are also against gender identity ideology.
2/
The thing is, their reasons why they are against it are different from the reasons why gender critical people are against it.
3/
Gender critical people are against gender identity ideology, because they believe gender is a set of harmful social stereotypes which are especially harmful to women.
Let's first describe what the reality is, so we can compare:
a) humans are mammals and like other mammals they can be one of the two sexes
3/
b) the human culture is one of the things that distinguish es other animals from humans and the human culture interprets the biological distinction of sexes in certain ways. Often those interpretations go beyond what is provided by the biology.
When reading scientific articles about "gender identity" ALWAYS check if they control for sexual orientation.
It's very easy to choose only homosexual trans identifying males and compare them to heterosexual females and claim that they discovered brain "gender identity".
2/
Sexually dimorphic nucleus is a brain structure linked to sexual behaviours in animals. In some animals the difference between sexes is big with respect to this structure. In humans the difference is smaller, but it wouldn't be surprising, if the difference is still there.
3/
Some research links this brain structure to sexual orientation in mammals.
It is not surprising. Many animals must know with which sex to mate and how to attract a partner.
I would like to discuss the idea of "social construct". What is it and what it is not?
2/
The "construct" part means that it is something that was created (probably by humans). It suggests it is something that could be different, if people had decided to create it differently.
3/
It does not necessarily mean it is meaningless or irrelevant. It can have a huge impact on people's lives.
One of them is creating fake consensus. They all pretend the matter is already settled and their ideology is the "truth".
That's why it's so important to always present alternative points of view whenever they attempt that.
2/
When an external observer sees an exchange, and they see many people claiming the same thing they start to think it's a consensus. But it's fake consensus. There was never any conclusion and often the discussion didn't happen at all.
3/
That's why it's always important to post disagreeing opinions. It's also important to ask for evidence of people's claims. And to point out what they are doing (creating fake consensus).
People who spread fake consensus will not be able to provide evidence.