In light of my previous tweet, people are asking what were my 21 lessons. Here they are (actually 22) from TPS #578.

1. Your worst allies determine your optics, so either don't have allies, or don't play optics.

2. Everything you said will be held against you, forever...
3. Your opponent is not bound to your interpretation of their words.

4. If you don't know everything about your opponent's statement, you are not in a position to criticize it.

5. In debate, your strategy cannot be to hide your true intent...
6. Your opponent is not bound to your interpretations of messages coming from authorities you recognize.

7. Your proxies are less competent than you are, so don't use proxies.

8. Do not let your opponent define the standard by which your position is true or false...
9. Don't give your opponent an opportunity to display an obviously agreeable common ground.

10. Your proxies will have been convinced by the arguments you've made in the past, so don't expect them to self-censor for your strategic concerns...
11. Your opponent does not have to share your authoritarian desires. Authority is not gained through persuasion.

12. Do not shoot for an intentional interpretation of wrongdoings where an unintentional one would suffice...
13. If you strategy is to disavow for optics purposes, don't be surprised when your opponent disavows you for optics purposes.

14. Any grounds you've abandoned yourself will be ignored by your opponent...
15. If you use the platform given by your opponent to accuse him of deplatforming instead of advocating for the ideas you wanted to advocate for, don't be surprised when your opponent dismisses your self-contradictory attitude...
16. Any movement you create will be grifted by people who don't share your ideas or strategic interests.

17. Your desires to impose authority have no value in debate against an opponent who does not recognize the legitimacy of that authority...
18. Optics are a game that is defined by your opponent. Don't play games where your opponents set the rules.

19. For each person you disavow on your right, a dozen will disavow you on your left and you won't have any good arguments against their decision...
20. Begging for power without leverage is useless.

21. Don't celebrate the shutting down of your opponent when you've previously argued that he was shutting you down.

22. If you are born from chaos, don't expect to master order.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JFGariepy

23 Mar
This bill explicitly installs a regime of injustice against the heterosexual lifestyle. It makes it criminal in Canada to attempt to convince a child to become heterosexual, while also indicating "for clarity" that it remains perfectly legal...… attempt to convince them to live the homosexual or trans lifestyles. A blatantly discriminatory bill that hilariously worries about one kind of "conversion" while ignoring the elephant in the room: the fact that the other type of conversion, protected in this bill may not.. in the child's interest. A perfect legal tool to intimidate the medical and educational actors in becoming tools of propaganda who will further the advancement of non-reproductive lifestyles.
Read 5 tweets
7 Feb
Here's a thread about important elements of my book, The Revolutionary Phenotype. I'm publishing these snippets because I saw some people were asking questions about my theory for the emergence of life, and I think it's best if my theory is available on the web. 1/x
For those who aren't familiar with my book's thesis, The Revolutionary Phenotype is a theory of the emergence of life that explains why: 1. Life exists. 2. How the first replicator of a line of descent appears and 3. Why we have genetic layers (DNA, RNA, Proteins). 2/x
What is a Phenotype and what is a Revolutionary Phenotype? (p. 25-26, The Revolutionary Phenotype)
Read 15 tweets
20 Jan
Farewell President Trump. You campaigned on draining the swamp only to become the swamp. I look at this presidency and I ask myself: How can a guy with such experience leading an organization understand so little about leverage and politics? /thread
You campaigned on non-interventionism and replaced wars with drone raids and missiles. You told us the officials are lying to get us into military intervention and as soon as you were in office started believing their lies.
You started a government shutdown only to cancel it because "People don't like the shutdown." You called out the fake news but let their commentary hurt you and guide your policy.
Read 5 tweets
5 Nov 20
Some people are confused between the narratives from the mainstream media which has called Michigan for Biden, and the, which still shows an official count with an advance for Trump.
Looking at county-by-county data, there are 81/83 reported as fully counted by Michigan SOS. The two remaining counties are Antrim and Wayne for as far as I can understand their Excel sheet.
In 2016, the Wayne county, a big one, went overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton providing her with an edge of 290,451 votes. That is why the media is predicting a flip for Michigan; once those votes come into the count, unless Trump has greatly improved his performance from 2016...
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct 20
We are approaching 2 years following the publication of my book, which warns humanity about the dangers of editing the DNA germ line. The truth of my thesis was acknowledged by Robert Trivers. Yet, congress will soon be face a vote on legalizing DNA...

..editing on sperm and eggs, which will result in humanity getting engaged in a replicator tango. The consequences are irreversible and will lead to the demise of DNA-based human civilization.

To make matters worse, science educators and journalists are poorly informed about...
..the consequences of a phenotypic revolution. I urge the scientists who have not yet spoken out about these dangers to take position and inform the public and politicians about the dangers of CRSPR.

@RichardDawkins @BretWeinstein @HeatherEHeying @SparkDialog @EricRWeinstein
Read 4 tweets
29 Aug 20
Here are some comments on @elonmusk's #Neuralink demo. I've been involved in research on implantable devices in monkeys so I have a good idea of how this compares to research done in universities.
The idea of using implants in the brain to cure certain disorders is potentially valuable, but will likely remain for many centuries an exceptional measure for a small number of disorders and a relatively small portion of the population.
Elon Musk presents the use of air-guns to insert electrodes into the brain as primitive and proposes instead to use a robot-surgeon. It should be noted that these air guns do not go at very high speeds and ultimately the actions of the robot are most likely needing...
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!