Shall we take a close look at today’s splash in the Times Scotland edition? I think there’s something very wrong with it and that readers aren’t being told the whole story. See what you think. Image
Iran meddling in Scottish elections in a bid to destabilise the UK. Looks bad, eh? The Iranian regime is nasty and, like Russia, has form for stirring the pot. However, true or not, the story as presented here has no place on the front of any newspaper, let alone the Times...
So, what is the source of this story? It’s a report by the Henry Jackson Society, a right-wing think tank and lobbying organisation and written by an academic employed by them called Dr Paul Stott. What are his credentials? Dr Stott is an academic and apparently an expert on
British jihadism who was (and for all I know may still be) a tutor at SOAS. Dr Stott seems problematic. In 2019 he was publicly slapped down by SOAS… after he tweeted about the rapper Stormzy’s father “doing a runner” and then suggested Stormzy should
be grateful for being brought up by Britain’s welfare state. The tweet drew heavy criticism.…
In a statement SOAS disowned Dr Stott’s comments, saying they “…certainly do not accord with the values of SOAS as an institution. We agree with the criticism that has been expressed that these comments are ill-informed and extremely offensive. We fully understand why
SOAS staff and students, and the wider community, are deeply concerned about statements such as this being made.” So, the source for the Times’ story is a report by an academic whose comments about race have been disowned by his university and who, coincidentally,
has written for the right-wing magazine Spiked. People may draw their own conclusions about Dr Stott’s views and motivations, but of course this doesn’t mean he’s wrong about Iran. What then is the Henry Jackson Society? It’s a far-right think tank funded by …
well, they’d rather not say. Indeed, so secretive is the HJS it pulled funding from two Westminster parliamentary group rather than disclose to the Commons standards watchdog who pays its bills.…
Henry Jackson Society members past and present have links to the US far-right and to Trump and to anti-Islamic and white supremacy individuals and groups, including Steve Bannon and Breitbart, the Gatestone Institute and the Mercers.…
HJS is also linked directly into the UK Government. Michael Gove, it will surprise no-one to learn, is a former director of HJS. Both Gove and Priti Patel have been paid thousands of pounds in benefits by HJS, while
the Conservative Government has paid more than £80,000 to HJS for a report on UK connections to Islamic terrorism.…
All this money and contacts and ideas going back and forth and yet we don’t know who is funding HJS or what they want. Unless we go digging.…
So, lets take stock. We have a report by an academic with some questionable views who is working for a far-right thinktank that won’t say who pays its bills but is connected to anti-Islamists and white supremacists and billionaire funders of the far-right, that has the
ear (and the chequebook) of UK ministers that claims Iran is trying to meddle in Scottish politics. The Times should be aware of all of this yet doesn’t mention a word of it to readers. Not a single caveat. Odd, don’t you think?
This central claim made by Stott MAY BE TRUE and we know that the Iranian government is deeply unpleasant. But even so, we still have no idea from the Times report whether readers should pinch the nose before ingesting the HJS report due to the possibility it may be
a) an exaggeration by right-wingers with the intention of casting shade on the forthcoming Scottish election and thereby the legitimacy of its winners, b) a real and substantial threat to democracy or c) the punchline of a laughably incompetent plot?
The report is presented as de facto credible and any possibility of other motivations for its author and paymaster are not interrogated. Indeed, beyond a mention of Facebook the Times doesn’t appear to triangulate the claims at all.
By any measure this is not good journalism. It should not be on a front page in this form and certainly not anywhere at all without a health warning to readers about its source, the Henry Jackson Society.
What a mess The Times has become.
PS I'm glad so many people have found this useful. The Times and the Henry Jackson Society haven't denied any of it.
In a world so awash with malign disinformation it is vital to our democracy and freedoms that we can learn about events from honest and reliable sources.
It is painfully clear from the 'Iran' story that the capacity of The Times to be that truthful and reliable broker has been deeply compromised. It is not the first time. In recent years the paper has repeatedly and without foundation attacked both Muslims and trans people.
I think of the Times nowadays as being like one of those poor creatures with a parasitic larvae in its brain. It still looks like its old self, but it is doomed to obey awful commands while being eaten from the inside out.
I feel sad for my many former colleagues who know how bad and how dangerous this situation has become but live in fear that dissent will cost them their livelihood. I hope they find courage.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Katherine O'Donnell

Katherine O'Donnell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kathy__odonnell

4 Mar
Hello and welcome to the many new followers. I feel this is a good moment to tell you where I stand on Scottish independence, so bear with me as it may be a bit of a thread. I’ve never had any truck with the claim that Scotland couldn’t thrive as ...
an independent state. Of course it could, but in 2014 I voted No because I believed – and still do – for all their flaws, supranational alliances such as the EU are our best means of peaceful cooperation. I felt that if the UK could move to a federal model that gave ...
the nations much greater autonomy and an equal say in shared matters, we might have the best of both worlds. Also, by 2014 I’d had seven years as an editor focused solely on Scotland and its politics and I had no confidence in either Alex Salmond or his ...
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov 20
Stirring hatred of minorities leads to violence and deaths. Across the world 350 trans people are known to have been murdered in the past year, 11 in Europe.
In the UK, a relentless anti-trans press campaign and political discourse has led to record levels of violence, ...
... harassment and discrimination in the workplace directed at trans people.
Worldwide, trans women are by far the most likely victims of violence and murder, particularly those who are black or of mixed ethnicity. Brazil, Mexico and the US have the highest ...
.... murder counts.
The figures for each year are compiled by the Trans Murder Monitoring Project…
Read 6 tweets
19 Sep 20
Last year, in full knowledge of Johnson’s dishonesty and other terrible flaws, The Times urged readers to vote for him.
It was an act of breathtaking cynicism. Johnson was never fit to govern.
This isn’t a change of heart. It’s the prelude to a change of rider to Gove.
Why Gove? Because he’s Murdoch’s man and because the government-guaranteed editorial independence of The Times from its owner was broken with the appointment of John Witherow as editor against the wishes of the paper’s own independent editorial board.
Why should internal shenanigans at a newspaper matter?
Because journalism conducted with integrity and vigour is our bulwark against government by criminals, rogues and despots.
When an editor answers to a proprietor rather than to their conscience and the readers we are lost.
Read 18 tweets
7 Mar 20
A letter signed by 338 (utterly wonderful) members of staff ⁦@guardian⁩ is strongly critical of the paper’s transphobic editorial line and calls on editor ⁦@KathViner⁩ to change course.…
Guardian staff wrote that they were ”...proud to work at a newspaper which supports human rights ... but the pattern of publishing transphobic content has interfered with our work and cemented our reputation as a publication hostile to trans rights and trans employees”.
Three trans staff have left the paper in recent months amid distressing descriptions of hostility from some senior writers and executives. However, concerns over editorial views and actions go back much further.
Read 7 tweets
20 Nov 19
In Brazil this past year 130 trans people were murdered. In Mexico 63. In the US, where the government is taking away rights from trans people, 30 have been murdered. Across Europe 9 people have died and 1 in the UK.
Trans Day of Remembrance #TDOR. Yet...
... these numbers are the tip of an iceberg and we know that many more deaths go officially unrecorded.
Trans people are less than 0.5 per cent of the population but face overwhelming levels of hate and violence.
Here in the UK, some politicians, journalists and others ...
... with influential public platforms seek openly to take away the trans population’s legal protections. In Scotland, MSPs Joan McAlpine and Jenny Marra had chosen today to invite to the Scottish Parliament speakers who agitate against the human rights of trans people and ...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!