So there's this take I've been kicking around in my head riffing on Wark's idea that capitalism has been replaced by vectoralism... Specifically that the capitalist class were overshadowed by a managerial class who is now being overshadowed by an ephemeral grift class.
No class ever gets entirely replaced (even aristocrats still exist), but new classes rise in prominence. The grift class are rent-seekers defined by the relative temporariness & fluidity of their grifts. Finance bros, btc hucksters, protest swoopers, patent trolls, promoters...
As our world becomes more and more fluid & turbulent the stable long-term accumulative relationships of conventional capital like factory ownership are transcended in profit by gradient exploitation of very temporary, localized, severe disequilibria.
I've talked about memes before as exploding pyramid schemes that end up acting as ping messages in the network structure of society, mapping distance between clusters. A kind of market clearing mechanism in social relationship space. It has a certain resonance here...
It's not an particularly optimistic model since it doesn't imply an overall trajectory of market -> zero-profit efficiency but instead a move to a fractal non-smoothly continuous/differentiable landscape where chaos creates micro hyper-variable opportunities for profit.
That is to say the breakdown of overall / universal emergent commonality (both 'truth' in the sense of shared epistemological worlds and price in the sense of a clearing market) shifts profit opportunities to the hyperparticular and temporary. It also *increases* net profit.
(Ducking back in to this thread after some pleasant distractions)
If we were naively teleological eg marx we could abstract a kind of historical progression story towards maximal discontinuity / information chaos / fractal arbitrage possibilities (or maybe assume a final break)
This presents an amusing version of marx where maximal anti-market (eg capitalist) dynamics accrue in deeper and deeper penetration until there's just a fractal anti-market of increasing towards infinite (albeit chaotic and inconsistent) profit margins in every relationship.
One could go further and say that all heretofor history has been the history of market bubbles, and the progression of history is towards nonstop infinite bubbles everywhere (the complete opposite of market clearing). And then lol communism is the big reset to perfect markets. :P
But of course there is no teleological attractor to a desirable end of history. Rather the rise of the grifter class/era is the collapse of the managerial class/era. The centralization of epistemic/cultural/etc functions killed off more natural ecosystems of such leading to grift
We are in an era of broken culture/epistemology/etc and a lack of any clear way to reestablish the universals necessary to freedom and communication. The two paths are fracture to reactionary patchwork or the bootstrapping of bottom-up social epistemological tactics/forms.
This is to say that while we *could* just passively trace an arc of postmodernity to fractal microfascism, humanity isn't entirely down and out. New universals can emerge from the bottom-up to replace the shoddy universals imposed top-down.
The explosion of grift that we've seen can, and maybe even is, turning. There is no magical *incoherence* to reality that gives natural skew towards a perpetually increasing fractal grift / arbitrage from communication/knowledge gulfs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's weird to be decades into libertarians discovering left market anarchists and still fielding these kinds of critiques. Anarchism isn't "remove the state and whatever might come is good" it's a deep critique of power and thus *obliges* cultural and institutional changes.
Yes, we frequently highlight the systematic and dispersed impact of sustained state violence on shaping our present capitalist world and its economic and social norms. But we are not "come what may" advocates. As Charles emphasized endlessly: *we* are the market. We get choices.
So libertarians tend to miss that we are obliged not only to rip out the continued impacts of state violence that prop up bosses, corporations, etc, but also to work to *undo* the centuries of distortions and lasting impact upon the distributions and *norms* of our society.
"Lifestyle anarchism" continues to signify whatever one personally finds frustratingly illegible about a *movement* rather than a *Party.*
You don't know the local prison support crew? Then they're lifestylists. You don't get why some friends are brewing kombucha? Lifestylists!
Movements are fluid ecosystems. They grow projects & networks that defy easy mapping. They accrue tacit knowledge from praxis & argumentation that can't be codified into a single FAQ or onboarding document.
This is frustrating to newbies and infuriating to would-be bureaucrats.
Pretty much no one in the entire fucking history of the anarchist movement said "let's just squat and ride bikes; fuck all struggle and strategy." You're tilting at a crimethinc zine that doesn't even really exist and that they repudiate with their every publication for decades.
Love the inane "trump voters are just a product of material conditions" re-tread of 2016's "it's just economic anxiety." Same sort of reactionaries saying it, but they've swapped from identifying as libs to marxists.
People love Trump because 1) our epistemic ecosystems are toxic sludge, 2) many people have intense investments in the (often non-material) benefits of patriarchy and racism, 3) fear of ratcheting cancelation has scared every type of amoral bastard into mobilizing together...
4) transphobia is intense and rabidly popular rn as a blowback to progress, 5) mild personal inconveniences and changes to every day life during COVID radicalized people for life, 6) the left keeps pratfalling with horrifically bad analysis, and yes 7) inflation sucks.
Like don't get me wrong, I have my critiques and deviances from some of the movement's tendencies, but for better or worse modern anarchism is a mixture of radical feminism, quaker consensus, fourth generation warfare theory, 70s anthropology, and some of the autonomists.
It's cringe to look at direct action cells and be like "ah yes, I know this, Bakuninist terrorism." Stirner is more of an online meme than a popular influence. Virtually no one reads Nietzsche and Aragorn said he was of zero inspiration to his attempt to make "nihilism" a thing.
Well yeah, obviously. *Specific* revolutions will be won. Insurgencies will erode the ability of power everywhere to function. Prefigurative experimentation will spread more liberatory norms. Technologies will be contested and shifted.
Our forever walk towards anarchy -- as Malatesta described it -- is not a single hop on a single day. It's a gradual process of erosion and catalyzing strength.
Such evolution can be violent and punctuated, but there is no magical day after which we finish and rest.
When I was a young anarchist in the 90s and early 00s, the entire movement used "After The Revolution" as an ironic meme to emphasize the absurdity and the ignorance of anyone in that frame. We were also steadfastly hostile to nihilism. Because progress is possible without magic.
An underexamined problem is that the most noxious reactionary shit emerges in radical spaces during the downturn.
2008-20010 was horrible. 2015-2018 was likewise the worst. Say what you will about the grifters and monsters flooding in during the peaks, the lean years are nasty. t.co/WKGmJQ8aeu
When the tide comes in there's a feeding frenzy, everyone eats well but new monsters arrive. Then the new monsters are slowly and painfully eliminated and the children spawned mature. Then there's no resources, contests feel zero-sum, and power floods into non-radical lefty shit.
Like we got nihilists at the bottom of the first downturn during Obama's ascension, and tankies at the bottom of the last one, when Bernie became a thing.
These were both permanent massive injuries to the struggle for liberation that continue to poison shit.