So there's this take I've been kicking around in my head riffing on Wark's idea that capitalism has been replaced by vectoralism... Specifically that the capitalist class were overshadowed by a managerial class who is now being overshadowed by an ephemeral grift class.
No class ever gets entirely replaced (even aristocrats still exist), but new classes rise in prominence. The grift class are rent-seekers defined by the relative temporariness & fluidity of their grifts. Finance bros, btc hucksters, protest swoopers, patent trolls, promoters...
As our world becomes more and more fluid & turbulent the stable long-term accumulative relationships of conventional capital like factory ownership are transcended in profit by gradient exploitation of very temporary, localized, severe disequilibria.
I've talked about memes before as exploding pyramid schemes that end up acting as ping messages in the network structure of society, mapping distance between clusters. A kind of market clearing mechanism in social relationship space. It has a certain resonance here...
It's not an particularly optimistic model since it doesn't imply an overall trajectory of market -> zero-profit efficiency but instead a move to a fractal non-smoothly continuous/differentiable landscape where chaos creates micro hyper-variable opportunities for profit.
That is to say the breakdown of overall / universal emergent commonality (both 'truth' in the sense of shared epistemological worlds and price in the sense of a clearing market) shifts profit opportunities to the hyperparticular and temporary. It also *increases* net profit.
(Ducking back in to this thread after some pleasant distractions)
If we were naively teleological eg marx we could abstract a kind of historical progression story towards maximal discontinuity / information chaos / fractal arbitrage possibilities (or maybe assume a final break)
This presents an amusing version of marx where maximal anti-market (eg capitalist) dynamics accrue in deeper and deeper penetration until there's just a fractal anti-market of increasing towards infinite (albeit chaotic and inconsistent) profit margins in every relationship.
One could go further and say that all heretofor history has been the history of market bubbles, and the progression of history is towards nonstop infinite bubbles everywhere (the complete opposite of market clearing). And then lol communism is the big reset to perfect markets. :P
But of course there is no teleological attractor to a desirable end of history. Rather the rise of the grifter class/era is the collapse of the managerial class/era. The centralization of epistemic/cultural/etc functions killed off more natural ecosystems of such leading to grift
We are in an era of broken culture/epistemology/etc and a lack of any clear way to reestablish the universals necessary to freedom and communication. The two paths are fracture to reactionary patchwork or the bootstrapping of bottom-up social epistemological tactics/forms.
This is to say that while we *could* just passively trace an arc of postmodernity to fractal microfascism, humanity isn't entirely down and out. New universals can emerge from the bottom-up to replace the shoddy universals imposed top-down.
The explosion of grift that we've seen can, and maybe even is, turning. There is no magical *incoherence* to reality that gives natural skew towards a perpetually increasing fractal grift / arbitrage from communication/knowledge gulfs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Leverage in our world is situational and highly particularized. And leverage to what end? Certainly a homeless hacker can disrupt the function of the existing order, increase costs until some structures become unsustainable.
Leftists and organizationalists are so captured in the thrall of massification precisely because their power fantasy of a mobilized army of the proletariat coarse-grains over all the messy complexity that requires intellectual labor. A nice narrative, not a blueprint for attack.
The entirety of capitalism has spent more than a century aggressively restructuring to remove the old "just seize the factories" vulnerability. Production is distributed and workers are either made extremely redundant or vastly compensated and bought-in.
Anarchism is unavoidably a "totalizing" ideology because we're not pluralistic "panarchists" who would happily accept there being a patriarchal state in the next town over.
Core to the Beautiful Idea is the notion that our freedom is entangled with EVERYONE's freedom.
The entire anarchist movement had a decade long fight over the 00s about "national anarchism" and whether we were perfect pluralists who would tolerate any contortion and redefinition of anarchism, any local tyranny, or whether there were limits and thus universals we defend.
The fascist "national anarchists" and their "panarchist" defenders were resoundingly defeated and forever banished, sometimes at great cost and after much fighting.
Importantly, we excluded them from the bottom-up without ratifying and imposing some platformist party line.
hilariously sloppy and cartoonish reduction of the complex actual intellectual lineage at play, but also amusingly kinda right despite the wildness of grabbing Weil to represent left ascetism
after ww2, with the bomb and technocracy, the humanities and sciences reversed political associations, and this led to the aristocratic values of the classics department getting hybridized with young leftist students into a mutual hostility to modernity
left ascetism has *always* existed -- it's a fairly natural stance to prop up anticapitalism by going "i guess wanting things is bad" -- and this intersected with a pop reduction of Reich and Kropotkin into "human nature is good; machines/society make it bad"
Okay, look team. We can't be out here just making shit up. Yes, anarchists are smart, but it was decentralization and informality that made us hard to infiltrate. The AVERAGE anarchist in 06 was an activist who didn't read theory.
I'm not saying the *average* anarchist was a crustie oogle busy breaking beer bottles, but like, "average" over ANY very large movement has never been the intellectual book club nerds. It's activists who go to documentary nights and talk with people, but are like ehhh about books
If you're constraining "anarchist" to folks who have been organizing consistently in the movement for over a decade, then yeah, the average of those folks is super well read and can wipe the floor with leninist dorks but when we were hegemonic in activism the average was not that
Much of my youth revolved around the website ZineLibrary. It went down around Occupy in a massive loss for a movement whose ideas and knowledge mostly doesn't circulate online but in person.
Anyway I've put it back online with a *thousand* zines: zinelibrary.org
There's tons I've no doubt missed but, while I've tried to make it representative of every branch, I did have some broad limiting filters:
1) PDFs must be imposed. 2) PDFs must not be ugly.
Which largely excludes bad scans and lazy layouts. But some exceptions were made.
Any honest attempt at a comprehensive library representative of the whole movement requires toleration, so @ ing me about how X is problematic probably won't prompt a removal. But there ARE of course boundaries, eg no Ted K, ITS, national-anarchists, etc
This is the most productive public debate between an ancom and an ancap in all of human history so far.
But of course I have to interject that I already solved property a decade ago, and they're both clearly just groping towards my evaluation.
I dunk on Huemer a lot but he gets points for turning to rule utilitarianism (and endorsement of theft in extreme cases), yet it's a pretty severe backdoor for egalitarian considerations... including my insane "there are no objective titles, disagreement is necessary" stuff.
Anyway, property needs to be understood as a collapse of many dynamics around 1) autonomy, 2) agency, 3) utility re conflict, 4) utility re net capacity 5) utility re checks on power, as evaluated A) individually, and B) thru emergent social pressures.