There are five levels of abstraction at which I think the 2020 election was/may have been stolen (ie the Democrats illegitimately acquired power). At the highest level of abstraction, the acquisition of power is illegitimate when it is used contrarily to the natural interests of
the governed (or at least a part of it), and I think anyone reading this thread agrees that the Democrats' fundamentally anti-human tyrannical agenda does so. This is not a fedpoast; as the Founders argued prudence must guide any long-term strategy for regime change. At second-
highest level of abstraction, the Democrats stole the election by pushing long-term adverse changes to the political character of the citizenry, notably the "long march" through the institutions (especially education) and also mass immigration. At the middle level of abstraction
the Democrats stole the election through the lying media, Pfizer delaying the vaccine trail results until immediately after the election, the FBI keeping its investigation into Hunter secret while leaking about Trump left and right, the Russian Bounties hoax (eagerly embraced by
GOP Never-Trumpers like Cheney and Sasse etc), etc. These highest three levels of abstraction should make it clear that I am not fundamentally a small-d democrat and that therefore election results do not necessarily bestow legitimacy to power (at their best, they could deliver
good-enough outcomes such that nobody could prudently claim that any alternative system would do better in the long-term, although I'm not at all convinced the current American regime meets this test) although to the extent they demonstrate the underlying balance of power in a
society they could illuminate the prudence or lack thereof of attempting to challenge the regime. At any rate, the second-lowest level of abstraction sense in which the election was stolen is that the election rules were illegally changed in key states, especially in the Midwest
but also in Georgia (Abrams+Kemp/Raffensperger), by governors, state election boards, and activist state courts (contrary to the letter of the statute) to loosen safeguards related to mail-in voting by some combination of weakening/eliminating signature verification, voter ID,
time-stamps, ballot harvesting, and/or ballot drop-boxes, leading to a sharp fall in rejection rates in most states. The "innocent" explanation for these changes is to facilitate voting by those segments of the population unable or unwilling comply with basic instructions (which
seems unlikely to promote democratic legitimacy at the higher levels of abstraction) but these illegally-made changes also reduced safeguards against fraud. Finally, at the lowest-level of abstraction in regards to the election being stolen, ie literal voter-fraud, there is not
yet enough evidence to establish this, but there were irregularities involved in the vote-counting process (especially in Atlanta and Philadelphia) which still have not yet been adequately explained, in addition to many affidavits regarding mail-in ballot irregularities and the
statistical irregularities pointed out by Revolver News, which are more suspicious in conjunction with the Democrats' push to gut mail-in ballot safeguards. Concerns about mail-in ballot fraud were not invented by Trump: the NYT was concerned with mail-in ballot fraud in 2012,
the 2020 Paterson NJ municipal election was invalidated due to mail-in election fraud, and a Philadelphia judge pled guilty to committing voter fraud on behalf of various Democratic candidates in the last 5 years. In addition, I don't think the Trump campaign got a fair day in
court; even the SCOTUS was clearly loathe to even overturn PA's plainly unconstitutional election law changes, everyone knew the likely violent reaction to the courts moving towards invalidating the election, and even ostensibly "conservative" courts like the WI Supreme Court
upheld the state's plainly illegal election-law changes (in the direction of reducing safeguards) by hiding behind the "laches" doctrine for instance. Anyway, I've noticed a distinction on this issue between right-of-center boomers and zoomers I know: the former are generally
absolutely convinced that the election was literally stolen (which makes sense in a way since their cohort *did* vote strongly for Trump with Biden's advantage coming from demographic and generational replacement) while the latter, while hardly convinced that the election was
administered accurately, are more blaqpilled and willing to believe that the electorate may have chosen Biden, but therefore believe that the election was stolen in more indirect ways via the media, education system, the great replacement, etc. Overall, I think it's a real
possibility (but unproven) that the election was stolen in the most literal sense, but in the four more abstract ways of understanding political legitimacy listed above, it was certainly stolen IMO.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with ChicagoBoy

ChicagoBoy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chiboys73

1 May
It's still possible to build great religious buildings! Thread: Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ (Moscow, 2020): ImageImageImageImage
Basilica of Our Lady of Lichen (Poland, 2004): ImageImageImageImage
Basilica of Our Lady of Peace, Ivory Coast (1989: built by Ivory Coast's based post-independence leader Felix Houphouet-Boigny, unfortunately things went to shit after his death): ImageImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
2 Apr
New urbanism thread: probably my favorite project is Ciudad Cayala, a suburb of Guatemala City, built since 2003 in the Spanish colonial style: ImageImageImageImage
Poundbury, England, began in 1993 by Leon Krier: ImageImageImageImage
Richmond-upon-Thames, England, 1980s by Quinlan Terry: Image
Read 7 tweets
2 Apr
I disagree with the concept of the "marketplace of ideas" for multiple reasons. First, even the results of a perfectly-functioning market can be suboptimal if vice distorts consumers' utility functions, and this is especially problematic in politics since the majority can force
their vicious preferences on the entirety of the population. Second, classic market imperfections are especially present in political debate, in particular the tragedy of the commons; citizens' private incentives are towards rational ignorance and/or virtue-signaling since their
individual political positions will not affect the outcome of society. Third, per the "paradox tolerance," citizens can of course choose ideas that eliminate the marketplace of ideas itself. For these three reasons I think the metaphor is very inapt. Certainly the dissemination
Read 5 tweets
26 Mar
Thread on Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950): IMO Schumpeter is very important for understanding capitalism, the social evolution of capitalist societies, and our current politics in the West. Schumpeter was notable for his application of Nietzschean psychology to economics; in (1/22)
contrast to the homo economicus of English neo-classical economics, constantly calculating their marginal utility (in line with Nietzsche's understanding of English utilitarianism as characteristic of the "last man") in order to bring markets into static equilibrium, Schumpeter
emphasized that capitalism was characterized by constant dynamic *dis*equilibrium, a process he famously termed "creative destruction," driven by individual entrepreneurial geniuses. Schumpeter rooted the entrepreneurial impulse not only in the desire to enhance their consumption
Read 22 tweets
23 Mar
Outrageous anti-white discrimination and propaganda by Cigna:…
Why has CRT (ie cultural Marxism) become the official ideology of American big business? This was not always the case: in the 1950s General Electric (hypocritically or not) notably hired Ronald Reagan to make the case for the American system of free enterprise. Some of the
hypotheses proposed are implausible IMO. For instance, big business certainly supports the "diversification" of America via immigration in order to gain access to cheap labor (which conservative should stalwartly oppose) but it's unclear why this should lead to CRT; the idea that
Read 18 tweets
23 Mar
Was Alexander the OG Cultural Appropriator? After conquering the Persian Empire he adopted Persian court manners. The grateful Egyptians even declared him the son of the god Amun (the Egyptian sun god):
His successors (one wonders whether Alexander ever read the Cyropaedia) also adopted such customs in the kingdom of Egypt, a quasi-apartheid state run by the Greeks, where they nevertheless assimilated themselves to Egyptian religious customs. This is Ptolemy I Soter:
This is an image featuring Ptolemy VI Philometer:
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!