WHO REQUESTED HOUSE EARMARKS. Per my datacrunch (and confirmed by committee):
- 106 House Republicans. That is just under 50% of all H. Republicans.
- 221 House Democrats.
- Just 1 House Democrat did NOT request earmarks - @RepKatiePorter. She adamantly opposes the concept.
@RepKatiePorter Who requested earmarks? Easier to tweet the names of those who did not.
Bucshon
Budd
Burgess
Cammack
Cheney
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Comer
Crawford
Davidson
DesJarlais
Donalds
Duncan
Estes
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Fischbach
Foxx
Franklin
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Gohmert
Good
Gooden
Gosar
Granger
Green (TN)
Grothman
4/
Hagedorn
Harris
Hartzler
Hern
Herrell
Hice
Hill
Hollingsworth
Hudson
Huizenga
Issa
Jackson
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Keller
Kustoff
Lamborn
LaTurner
Lesko
Letlow
Mace
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCarthy
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
Miller (IL)
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Mullin
Murphy (NC)
5/
Norman
Norton
Nunes
Palmer
Pence
Perry
Pfluger
Porter
Posey
Rice (SC)
Rosendale
Roy
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Smith (MO)
Smucker
Spartz
Steel
Steil
Stivers
Taylor
Taylor Greene
Tiffany
Timmons
Wagner
Walorski
Waltz
Weber
Webster
Westerman
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What is happening now? Leader Schumer raised a point of order that the impeachment articles themselves are unconstitutional - that they do not rise "high crimes or misdemeanors".
Senate is voting on that. No debate is warranted for this point of order in impeachment court.
Staff and senators are now huddling, seemingly to discuss the procedural mechanics, maybe options here. Note that Leader McConnell's staff is huddling with conservatives as McConnell listens from just outside the circle.
Prior to this interlude, Schumer offered Republicans the chance to vote on the trial structure and have debate.
- That would have teed up resolutions from Sens. Lee and Cruz.
- And allowed for likely 3 hours of debate altogether.
- But Sen. Schmitt objected.
- And here we are.
NEWS here. @SpeakerJohnsontext to House members:
"the House Rules Committee will be posting soon today the text of three bills that will fund America’s national security interests and allies in Israel, the Indo-Pacific, and Ukraine, including a loan structure for aid..."
That is a main headline. Here is the full text sent by @speakerjohnson:
"After significant Member feedback and discussion, the House Rules Committee will be posting soon today the text of three bills that will fund America’s national security interests and allies ...
@SpeakerJohnson "... allies in Israel, the Indo-Pacific, and Ukraine, including a loan structure for aid, and enhanced strategy and accountability.
These will be brought to the floor under a structured rule that will allow for an amendment process..."
New and newsy letter now out from @SenSchumer. Many bottom lines:
- Baltimore: The WH sent over a authorization request this morning for the bridge and port. That will need bipartisan support to move.
1/
@SenSchumer - Ukraine aid: Waiting on Speaker Johnson. "Speaker Johnson has to ultimately decide for himself whether or not he will do the right thing for Ukraine ... if he’ll allow the extreme MAGA wing of his party to hand Vladimir Putin a victory"
- Israel: Is NOT mentioned.
2/
- (Schumer does push the Senate-passed security bill, which includes Israel funding.)
- FISA. Also, waiting on Speaker Johnson and the House. W/ clock ticking to wiretap program ended April 19.
- Pinnable quote: "The House is working on a path forward for their legislation."
3/
NEW: House has released another 5,000 hours of footage from J6. The prev. release was what Tucker Carlson got plus some cameras far from central areas.
Not sure yet what is in here - looking. And you can too! Reply with anything interesting.