Jaimie Arona Krems Profile picture
May 5, 2021 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Our paper is out in Psych Science!

In 6 experiments, we detail a stereotype at odds w narratives of progress toward gender equality: Americans believe women (but not men) who have casual sex have low self-esteem. It is pervasive, robust, unfounded.

A🧵
doi.org/10.1177/095679…
Big whoop, who cares (Part I)?

People perc'd to have low self-esteem are less likely to get hired for jobs, sought as friends, asked on dates + elected to office. This stereotype has economic + social consequences.

Women perc'd to have lowSE might also be targeted by predators
Who cares (II)?

This stereotype may underlie (well-meant) advice given to women, ppl shaping them:“some scholars have even suggested that short-term mating is never advantageous for women + thus [women] never truly desire it, even when they might think they do”(Vrangalova,2015)
Who cares (III)?

There's much (great!) gender stereotyping work. But real-world gender difs surrounding short-term sex are among the largest + most cross-culturally consistent. We know A LOT about prejudice (attitudes) at the intersection of gender + sexual behavior--not beliefs
We find that Americans hold this stereotype--that women (but not men) who have causal sex have low self-esteem both (a) explicitly (via multiple measures across experiments) + (b) semi-implicitly/intuitively (as evidenced via an experiment using the conjunction fallacy).
Is the stereotype--women (but not men) who have casual sex have low self-esteem--driven by usual suspects?

No, this stereotype is pervasive + not driven by perceiver gender, sexual behavior, political orientation, religiosity, sexism...

Even as casual sex is normalizing in US
It IS mediated by beliefs that women who have casual sex wish they could pursue a different strategy (e.g., women are having casual sex to try to secure long-term relationships)...

But telling people women are enjoying casual sex + have it because THEY WANT TO doesn't break it.
Finally, we might see *pluralistic ignorance*.

The ppl holding this belief reported their sexual behavior + self-esteem. No significant correlation or consistent pattern. (In reality, the costs/benefits of [casual] sex are complex!) We discuss why this belief might persist...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jaimie Arona Krems

Jaimie Arona Krems Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JaimieKrems

Aug 6
Why do we vent?

Now online @EvolHumBehav: Venting about one mutual friend (the target) to another (the listener) can make the people we vent to prefer--and also preferentially support--us over the people we vent about

A🧵on friends + Freud being wrong

👇 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…


Image
Image
Image
In 6 experiments, we asked participants to take on the role of listener (someone who's friends with both the speaker + the target)

Across experiments, listeners heard speakers vent about or overtly derogate the target. The only difference between venting + derog was the framing.
When the *same grievance* (last-minute canceling of plans) was framed as VENTING, listeners reported liking speakers better than targets

This preference did not appear when speakers derogated targets, neutrally gossiped about them, or vented about something else (car troubles)
Read 13 tweets
May 4, 2022
According to work in my field, attitudes toward abortion are not necessarily driven by what we say they are (on the left or the right).

They're not (solely) driven by abstract political ideologies or religion.

At the heart of the debate is a conflict over sexual strategies...
Moreover, if you think about it, it's pretty wild that people in Tempe would care about what strangers in Pensacola are up to in the bedroom.

On this view, THAT is a mystery to think on. Why should I care whether someone I'll never know--with no effect on me--follows my morals?
On this view, ppl care because others' sexual behavior can affect their outcomes:

More "committed" strategists' outcomes are threatened by less committed strategists (e.g., via cuckoldry).

So it behooves them to increase the costliness of sex. Access to safe abortion lowers it
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(