I grew up in a Zionist household, spent 12 years in a Zionist youth movement, lived 4 years in Israel, and have friends and family who served in the IDF.
When that is your world, it's hard to see apartheid when it's happening.
1/16
I grew up in France, in a Jewish community where the norm was unconditional love and support for Israel. Zionism wasn't even named because that's all we knew. Jews were nearly wiped by pogroms and repeated holocausts, and a Jewish state was the only way to keep us safe.
2/16
All Zionism is rooted in trauma and fear. It is first and foremost an ideology of self-liberation. It's about love Jewish people, survival for Jewish people. But Zionism is like any other ethnic nationalism, it's about prioritizing *our* safety and well-being.
3/16
Like all nationalisms, we were fed a historical narrative completely divorced from reality: that Palestine was a largely uninhabited piece of desert before we settled it; that in 1948 Palestinians willingly left because they were making room for Arab armies to...
4/16
..."throw Jews to the sea"; that Arab leaders turned down all Israeli and US peace offers and were unwilling to share the land; that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle-East; that despite terrorism, the IDF upholds the highest moral standards; so on and so on.
5/16
So the first reason that Israelis will never willingly make peace with Palestinians is that Israelis (and Zionist Jews around the world) live in a parallel world. They know alternate historical facts that feed more nationalism, militarism, and extremism.
6/16
The second reason is that the past 100 years of conflict have dehumanized Palestinians in the eyes of Israeli Jews. I mean this in a literal way: Israelis are not able to empathize with Palestinians, they aren't able to comprehend Palestinian suffering.
7/16
So when the IDF bombs Gaza and kills children, the average Israelis thinks that 1) it is the Palestinians' fault--for not agreeing to peace, for continuing to threaten and attack Israel, etc 2) Israel is merely defending itself and that there is simply no alternative.
8/16
The same rationale justifies Gaza's open-air prison; military checkpoints in the West Bank; bulldozing homes; etc. Israelis even made up the term "Pallywood", because for them, it's all a show to turn the world against Israel. The suffering is either fake or self-inflicted.
9/16
Of course, there are some Israeli leftists and anti-Zionists who fight for Palestinian liberation. But it's a tiny, and shrinking, minority. Most Israelis don't consider what it means for Palestinian freedom, dignity, and physical well-being to be systematically erased.
10/16
Israel is, by every definition, an apartheid state: if a Jew and an Arab commit the exact same crime in the West Bank, they will face two different legal systems. The Jew will face a civil court, the Arab will face a military court. Two legal systems for two ethnic groups.
11/16
But Israelis can't fathom that this is unjust. When they fight against people calling the occupation of the West Bank "apartheid", it's because Israelis genuinely believe that it's all self-defense and needed and legitimate.
12/16
These two factors (alternate history and dehumanization) mean that it is *physically impossible*--and I mean that in the most literal way--for Israel to willingly end the occupation and agree to a just solution to the conflict. Peace cannot come from within Israel.
13/16
Israeli society is getting more extreme, more nationalistic, more violent, and more entrenched in its own historical narrative & its own self-victimization. At this point, it is simply delusional to expect that things change will come from Israel.
14/16
The *only* thing that can bring Palestinian liberation is if the cost of the occupation outweighs its benefits. And that requires, just like for the apartheids in South Africa and the US South, massive external pressure.
15/16
That means consumer boycott of Israeli goods, corporate boycott of Israeli technology, and sanctions by Israel's main trade partner and political supporters, the US and EU. Those are the only measures that can meaningfully push Israel toward ending the occupation.
16/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Based on my conversation with Israeli friends and relatives--including many who call themselves "progressive" and "pro-peace"--this cartoon perfectly sums up how they see things.
This shows, more clearly than ever, that only external pressure can end violence & apartheid. 1/6
To them, slogans like "from the river to the sea" or "Free Palestine" are the same as "kill the Jews" or "more October 7th!".
To them, asking for freedom and equality for all between the river and the sea can *only* mean genocide of the Jews.
2/6
To them, nonviolent protestors around the world are either active supporters of Hamas or naive fools who engage in performative activism or virtue signaling.
They see pro-Palesinian protestors and armed militants as two sides of the same coin: genocidal antisemitism.
In this thread, I will not discuss the morality of the current war. I'll focus on the strategic and security arguments because those are the ones that lead so many Israelis and Zionists around the world to support the war, even if they hate Netanyahu and Israel's far-right.
The Washington Post just released an in-depth investigation on Israel’s assault on the al-Shifa hospital.
The Post analyzed open-source visuals, satellite imagery and all of the publicly released IDF materials.
Highlights from the investigation:
1/5
The Washington Post examined Israeli claims about al-Shifa as well as the evidence Israel presented to the world after it took control of the hospital.
It looks like other than a few PR videos, Israel presented almost no evidence to back up its claims.
2/5
Israel claimed that:
- five hospital buildings were directly involved in Hamas activities;
- the buildings sat atop underground tunnels that were used by militants to direct rocket attacks and command fighters;
- that the tunnels could be accessed from inside hospital wards
3/5
When Israel waged war on Gaza in 2021, I wrote that a just peace could not come from inside Israel. Since then, some have called my take arrogant and condescending toward the Israeli left.
I want to explain, because I feel very connected to Israel's anti-occupation left:
1/18
When I wrote it in 2021, I said that peace could not come from inside Israel because the vast majority of Israelis (and Zionists around the world) know a parallel history that erases the Nakba, apartheid & a litany of injustices against Palestinians.
This and 100 years of conflict, which have led to a deep dehumanization of Palestinians, mean that Israeli society is not capable of envisioning what justice could look like, and much less transforming itself to achieve this justice.
Right now, most Israelis are in full-fledged war mode: on the right, people are calling for outright ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza; those on the center and left say that civilian deaths are unfortunate but inevitable.
But it wasn't always like this:
1/22
When I lived in Israel, I was a "progressive" Zionist, and I was largely surrounded by progressive Zionists who had moved from Europe, the US, and Latin America.
We were secular, we were against settlements, we despised Netanyahu, and we wanted "peace in the Middle East".
2/22
When I say we wanted peace in the Middle East, it was a central part of our political identities: we studied Middle Eastern studies, volunteered in refugee camps in Jenin or Nablus, worked on "peace programs". We looked back at Yitzhak Rabin as a hero and a peacemaker.
This war is showing (again) that Palestinians have to audition for our empathy.
But in the past week, I've had difficult conversations with relatives who say "4,000 dead children, but can we trust these numbers? They come from Hamas".
So I want to address it heads on:
1/19
As of this writing, the latest numbers I could find, reported by the BBC, are that 11,240 people, including 4,630 children, have been killed in Gaza since Israel launched the assault on October 7th: