Thanks to the first volume of Michael Palin's diaries, I've just discovered the glory of one of the greatest travel pieces in British publishing history.
In early April 1977, The Guardian published a 7-page travel supplement on this "little-known" island nation:
(1/)
Great attention should be paid to the place names being used here.
Also that this is 1977, and web design wasn't a thing yet.
(2/)
The accompanying adverts were impressive - especially if you took the time to read them closely.
(3/)
Further surprises awaited in the text:
“… the islands will accelerate at first gently and then more rapidly as they approach Sri Lanka. Simple calculations suggest that the island group will hit the coast of Sri Lanka at a velocity of 940 km an hour on January 3, 2011.”
(4/)
And you have to admire quality destination marketing copy like this:
"…[enjoy] the many beaches from which terrorism has been virtually eliminated…”
(5/)
San Seriffe's indigenous people, the Flongs, were apparently celebrated every year with "the Festival of the Well Made Play."
(Another typography joke. A flong is actually a curved papier-mâché mould used in rotary letterpresses.)
(6/)
The two islands are called Upper Caisse and Lower Caisse.
How many typeface names can you spot?
The peninsula at the bottom is called Thirty Point.
Dead giveaways? This was 1977 - and no major newspaper had been this wilfully daft before. Fooled plenty.
(7/)
The cleverest bit of this:
It was originally going to be a single page. But then the Guardian realized a bigger (faked) feature would generate *more* money by running themed advertising - if advertisers were in cahoots & playing along.
They agreed.
It worked.
Genius.
(8/)
And it's hard to convey *just how much* those advertisers went along with this hoax.
It's spectacular.
(9/)
Guardian Deputy Editor David McKie recalled:
"The impact of the seven-page survey was quite astonishing. The office all day was bedlam as people pestered the switchboard with requests for more information...[they] simply refused to believe that the islands did not exist."
(10/)
The Guardian also sold a ton of "I've been to San Serriffe" bumper stickers - and, apparently, around 12,000 San Serriffe t-shirts.
I mean wtaf.
(11/)
For more pics of those....*incredible* adverts, and of the whole article itself, check out Doug Wilson's piece on San Serriffe here:
And lastly, I'm just about to start the second season of my curiosity newsletter, Everything Is Amazing - and it's partly going to be about fake maps. You might enjoy!
The new season of my newsletter is partly about exploring 'Terra Ineptias' - the landscape of glorious, absurd ways that fake maps have been used to befuddle and hoodwink folk for centuries. The first update:
I thought I knew the story of the "lost world" off the east coast of Britain, inhabited by Mesolithic people until rising sea waters engulfed it around 8,000 years ago...
But I didn't know about the *tsunami*.
Holy hell.
1/
What follows is my imperfect grasp of things.
Imperfect because I'm just an enthusiast who likes science - and also imperfect because, excitingly, the work is still going on, as part of one of the greatest prehistoric archaeological investigations in history.
2/
One September night in 1931, the British vessel Colinda hauled up its nets 25 miles off the Norfolk coast - and found something beautiful & deadly.
Embedded in a lump of peat was this 8.5 inch prehistoric harpoon, carved from bone or antler...
When I wrote about the Zanclean Megaflood filling the Mediterranean in 12-18 months (!) it was wistfully.
I'm English. Lovely place, England! But - Big Geological Drama? Not round 'ere, sadly.
Imagine my delight at what geophysicists have found in the English Channel!
1/
500,000 years ago, Britain was still part of the continental European landmass via a land-bridge - the Weald-Artois anticline, formed as rock buckled across Europe as the African plate ground northwards over tens of millions of years.
(This also made the Alps!)
But...
2/
...surely it was nibbled away gradually, as water crept in over thousands of years?
That was the assumption until recently.
But in 2015, bathymetric data collected by marine geophysicists at Imperial College showed 36 underwater “islands” suggesting a different story!
I recently learned something amazing about the Arctic - & my tiny mind is blown.
In my ignorance, I've always believed it's featureless & barren. But now I've learned what's underneath it - & if THAT was on dry land, it'd be a wonder of the modern world.
Buckle up!
1/
This is Mikhail Lomonosov (1711-1765): Russian polymath, scientist, writer - a lesser-known Isaac Newton.
He discovered the law of conservation of mass in chemical reactions, first saw Venus has an atmosphere, founded some of the key principles of modern geology...
2/
...and a town, a lunar crater, a *Martian* crater, a satellite, a porcelain factory (!) and an asteroid have all been named after him.
And at some point, as legend has it, he predicted there was something MASSIVE under the Arctic ice.
In Sept 2023, geophysicists over the world started monitoring an odd signal coming from the ground under them.
It was recorded in the Arctic, then Antarctica - then everywhere, every 90 seconds, regular as a metronome - for NINE DAYS.
What the HELL?
1/
In seismology, this is a USO: an Unidentified Seismic Object.
Perhaps if this discovery had leaked into mainstream news as quickly as potential alien biosignatures tend to do, we’d currently be seeing a big comeback for the HOLLOW EARTH ‘theory’.
Thankfully not the case!
2/
Instead, in the best collaborative tradition of modern science, researchers across the globe - 68 scientists from 40 institutions in 15 countries - joined forces to track down the signal’s source.
On the 21st July 1976, NASA released the very first colour image taken by the Viking 1 lander from the surface of Mars.
And....wait, what?
The Martian sky is BLUE?
1/
This is obviously not what anyone was expecting. Mars is...
Well, you can see it for yourself on a clear night, with your naked eye. It's noticeably red - about as red as Betelgeuse, tenth-brightest star in our night sky.
No blue. So - what? WHAT?
2/
The Martian atmosphere just isn't thick enough to be blue - just 600 pascals, vs the Earth's 101,000.
That scene in "The Martian" where the rocket's in danger of being blown over? No, sir. Not enough punch to it: space.com/30663-the-mart…