🚨🚨🚨 Gear up. Revealing three theses from Wuhan Institute of Virology which provides new details on Mojiang sampling, 4991 genome, 7896-clade, unpublished CoVs, coronavirus reverse genetics and more! All theses were supervised by Shi Zhengli. Links at the end of the thread.
1/ Serological Cross-Reactivity Analysis of Coronavirus Based on Nucleocapsid Proteins (by Ning Wang, May 2014)
Here are some key takeaways:
• It is the 1st time a WIV study mentions the miners outbreak: "Three miners died from pneumonia in Mojiang..we investigated the virus carried by bats in this cave..it is likely that the six miners were infected with the pathogen carried by bats."
• This very obviously - and for the third time - flies in the face of WIV's claim that the miner’s illness were thought to be related to fungal infection.
• What I find most fascinating: In this study, "fever patient sera were obtained from a hospital in Yunnan Province." 30 sera were obtained in total, and all marked MJ (almost certainly Mojiang).
Note: Shi's @Nature addendum mentions only 13 sera collected from 4 patients.
• A total of 170 bat samples were collected from Mojiang in 2012, of which 109 were positive for coronavirus, with a positive rate of 64%!
Seems the mine was indeed a holy grail for virus hunters!
• The author notes: "The full-length sequences of N and RdRp genes of several coronaviruses have been successfully amplified, but only a small number of full-length sequences of S genes have been amplified."
• On S gene sequences, the author notes: “there are still some urgent technical barriers to the amplification of the S gene sequences, especially the full-length sequences, and it is urgent to accomplish the relevant technical breakthroughs in future studies”
• In the acknowledgement section, the author thanks Linfa Wang for his "guidance" on the project. This confirms my long held suspicion that Linfa Wang knew about the miners outbreak.
"If three people died and it was controlled would we know it?"
• And finally the study reports, for the first time ever, Ra4991: "Overlap PCR was performed on the amplified bat coronavirus N gene, of which 4991, 3740(β)-N was amplified by laboratory associate"
2/ Reverse Genetic System of Bat SARS-like Coronaviruses and Function of ORFX (by Lei-Ping Zeng, April 2017)
A few illustrative quotes from the thesis:
• “In this study, we combined the advantages of two mainstream coronavirus reverse genetics methods, established a new efficient and cost-effective method”, and "a scheme to replace the S gene without traces”.
• The reverse genetics system established in this study “can be used to rescue viruses whose sequences have only been identified, to study the function of virus-encoded proteins, to help assess their pathogenicity, and to explore their evolutionary and transmission mechanisms.”
• The author also points out: “It can also help to evaluate the effectiveness of existing antibodies and drugs against SARS against these bat-derived SL-CoV.”
• And: “determining in the lab whether recombination occurs after co-infection with different SL-CoV strains and what new strains may arise..is beneficial for studying the evolutionary pattern of SL-CoV and providing a basis for preventing possible future outbreaks..”
• The author summarizes the outlook as: “At this point, our laboratory can establish a complete system from viral pathogen discovery, pathogen rescue and pathogen pathogenicity assessment to deepen and accelerate the epidemiological study of emerging viruses.”
• Zeng also mentions new methods that have emerged recently: “yeast recombination or in vitro recombination”, which “applied to the reverse genetics of coronaviruses could develop more efficient and economical method” for virology research. What happened to this line of study?
3/ Geographic Evolution of Bat SARS-related Coronaviruses (by Yu Ping, June 2019)
• “This study conducted large-scale detection and analysis of SARS-like coronavirus in bat samples collected from twenty regions in China from 2011 to 2016." A total of 9261 samples were collected (2815 from Yunnan), and 170 SARS-like coronavirus were detected (92 from Yunnan).
• "In this study, the full-length RdRp sequence (2757 bp) was amplified for phylogenetic analysis of the virus, and finally 60 full-length RdRp sequences of SARS-like coronaviruses were obtained from positive samples."
• This is important: “SL-CoVs without deletions in the RBM region are able to utilize ACE2 receptors.. whereas SL-COVs with deletions in this region are not able to utilize ACE2 receptors.. Currently, bat SL-CoVs without deletions in the RBM region are only found in Yunnan.”
• Based on the phylogenetic analysis of the coronaviruses, the author concludes: "bat SARS-like coronaviruses tend to cluster together more by geographic location than by host species, suggesting that space plays a greater barrier role."
• In this study they sequenced the whole genome of Ra4991, and three other SARS-like coronaviruses. (The table could hold important clues.)
• And this is big: The study confirms, for the first time, that the 7896-clade from the mojiang mine were sequenced way before the covid outbreak. And more than just the RdRp fragment: i.e. the Spike of 7896; ORF8 of 7896, 7909 & 7952; and the RBD+NTD of 7905, 7909, 7924 & 7931.
• So just to be clear: WIV had all these sequences at the time most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and they chose not to disclose it in Jan 2020, and even after 15 months.
And that's a wrap! Here is the link for the theses and their translations:
Interestingly, all the three unpublished ACE2 sequences (likely from Mojiang) are from R. pusillus.
According to EHA's R01 renewal, R. pusillus (Rpu) was among the most sampled species of bats. Yet, WIV has published next to nothing on Rpu's so far. ecohealthalliance.org/wp-content/upl…
Of note: R. pusillus has been proposed as a likely host of SARS2’s progenitor.
1/ Just musing here, but when the Mojiang miners died clearing bat droppings, it stands to reason that WIV would have left no stone unturned to investigate the cause, especially after they made advancements in NGS, genetically engineered cell lines and reverse genetics in 2017-18
2/ Li Xu, 2013: “the analysis of these 6 cases of unknown pneumonia..may be considered as follows: caused by "SARS-like CoV"
Wang, 2014: “it is likely that the 6 miners were infected with the pathogen carried by bats”
Canping, 2016: “4 people carried SARS virus IgG antibodies”
3/ WIV, 2017: “establish genetically engineered cell lines dedicated for virus isolation which will provide significant improvement over current cell lines..without having to relying on cytopathic effect (CPE) as all current methods do.” web.archive.org/web/2021081821…
Theory: In 2017, US lifted the #GoF moratorium. Subsequently, EcoHealth, through their DEFUSE proposal provided the WIV and parts of Chinese military with the necessary action plans and work protocols to create enhanced viruses. One of these enhanced viruses escaped the Wuhan lab
I'm not implying anything insidious here. My proposition is: WIV conducted the DEFUSE work using their own funding, with the involvement of Chinese military.
Did NIH fund this research? No.
Did NIH funding support the research? Likely, yes.
Did NIH know about it at the time? Idk
EHA/NIH funded research at WIV, which successfully modified bat coronaviruses previously unable to infect humans, and successfully modifed them to make them even more infectious in human-like cells.
🧵Thread on a project undertaken by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in collaboration with Chinese military researchers and other institutes. You've probably never read it before, in detail.
This thread requires patience and time, from those who are really interested.
So, the ‘major project’ as it was called, was launched in 2012, and funded by China’s state-run NSFC.
It was named: ‘’Discovery of animal-derived pathogens and their pathogenicity to humans” (Grant no. 81290340). archive.is/9c4Z8
The project had 5 subject leaders: Shi Zhengli, Guodong Liang, Zhang Yongzhen, Cao Wuchun, and Xu Jianguo, with Xu Jianguo leading the charge.
This plan involved collecting samples from bats, rats, ticks, and mosquitoes over five years (2013-2017) .... archive.is/Q8Bb4
WSJ has confirmed the names of the sick Wuhan researchers. This is perhaps the most important additional clue that has come to light. This also fits with all the other insights we have.
Ben Hu specialized in conducting experiments on humanized mice – in order to gain information about their potential transmissibility and danger to humans.
So I’ve been away for a while and probably for the first time, I think I’m behind the curve in the #OriginsofCOVID debate.
Some recent happenings led me back. Before I venture onto that, here’s a lil rundown, a repeat of sorts, of what I have been carrying with me all this time.
It’s late 2019 and hospitals in Wuhan were overflowing with patients having SARS-like symptoms. Strict measures were put in place to restrict the flow of information.
In early 2020, news started trickling out of China - and I distinctly remember watching it with horror.
Wuhan was far outside the hot zone where SARS-like coronaviruses of such kind had been previously identified.
Wuhan was also known to a specialized scientific community, as the home to an institute studying SARS-like viruses, especially the ones with pandemic potential.