According to #evopsych, it's not surprising that male tourists pay for sex with locals. What is surprising, as April Gorry found, is that women do the same. Is #evopsych wrong about women's mating psychology? In some ways, yes:
A 🧵
2. White women tourists visiting the Caribbean and other warm-weather locales are stereotyped as sex-starved nymphomaniacs lusting after sexually potent dark-skinned men. Where did this myth come from?
3. Western tourist women often do enter into sexual relationships with local men in Belize, where Gorry did her fieldwork, and many other resort locations:
4. The men that tourist women choose seem to lack all the qualities, such as financial resources and status, that #evopsych claims they should have. In an apparent reversal of sex roles, tourist women often provide their sexual partners with substantial financial resources:
5. What's going on? Women tourists unfamiliar w/ the local culture don't recognize the men's low status but do notice universal aspects of their mate quality. First, men display cues of competency & mastery of the physical & social environments, which indicate resource potential:
6. Second, the men exhibit powerful cues of investment and devotion:
8. But in many cases it's a hustle. Local men at the bottom of the economic and ethnic hierarchy learn to feign indicators of romantic love in order to obtain sexual and financial benefits from tourist women:
9. The motivations of the men, however, are not quite so simple:
10. Gorry concludes her dissertation with an analysis of #RomanceNovels. The male heroes are universally portrayed as masters of their physical and social environments...
11. ...and the heroes are obsessed with the heroine.
In ancestral environments, competence and devotion would have been reliable indicators of male mate value, and are probably stronger cues than the evolutionarily novel financial resources often emphasized in #evopsych:
12. If you research sex and mating from an evolutionary perspective, check it out.
13. Her 1994 MA thesis on #femalecompetition looks interesting too (not sure if it's available anywhere):
/end
Postscript. The informants for the romance tourist study:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. First, please read this excellent article on the Lynn dataset, which details its racist origins (Lynn: "predominantly white states should declare independence and secede from the Union")... statnews.com/2024/06/20/ric…
3. ...and which also details its deep empirical flaws, such as "selectively includ[ing] samples with particularly low scores for sub-Saharan Africa, while disregarding those with higher scores":
2. Recently @dconroybeam penned an Op-Ed on the harmful use of cherry-picked EP research, citing examples of mass shooters linked to EP-inspired manosphere ideology. He called on EP to do more to "defend our work from misappropriation"
3. Then, @sentientist pushed back, expanding the discussion to racial killings, HG research, and politics, and absolving EP and HG research from responsibility for the bad behavior of others with this central claim:
Sexual reproduction, the recombination of two parental genomes into one offspring genome, is very widespread in eukaryotes. This 2→1 mode of reproduction has many evolutionary consequences...
3. In a very wide range of eurkaryotic species, parental genomes are each packaged into cells (gametes) that exhibit:
1. Much human genetic variation is phenotypically meaningless. Why? Cooperative genes are locked in a forever war w/ selfish genes. The cooperative genes have won most battles but now our genomes are littered with the dead & decaying bodies of a million selfish genes. 🧵
2. Genome sizes vary tremendously in ways that do not obviously relate to organism complexity, e.g., many fish and amphibians have huge genomes compared to mammals (note that the number of base pairs on the x-axis is on a log scale): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_si…
3. Why?
The explanation requires the Williams/Dawkins concept of selfish genetic elements that "enhance their own transmission at the expense of other genes in the genome, even if this has no or a negative effect on organismal fitness": journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a…
1. What do we know about hunter-gatherers (HG)? This is the go-to book, first published in 1995, w/ a 2nd edition in 2013. Here's an overview of the book that I hope will encourage @NPR, @sciam, & others to consult it when reporting on & evaluating the import of new HG studies 🧵
2. The key theme is that HGs vary a lot, hence the word *Spectrum* in the subtitle, but in principled ways that are best understood in a human behavioral ecology (HBE) framework:
3. The Preface recounts the sensationalist "discovery" of the Tasady, widely reported in the media as Stone Age relics, which was later debunked. A cautionary tale:
Binary biological sex is not a system to exhaustively categorize every living thing.
Instead, it plays key causal roles in the evolution of many traits across the eukaryotes.
A preview of our journey [syngamy: fusion of two gametes] (Parker 2014):
3. Two sexes are ultimately a consequence of sex. Sex (meiosis & fusion of 2 gametes) was present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor, a single-celled organism. (But no sexes yet!)