According to #evopsych, it's not surprising that male tourists pay for sex with locals. What is surprising, as April Gorry found, is that women do the same. Is #evopsych wrong about women's mating psychology? In some ways, yes:
A 🧵
2. White women tourists visiting the Caribbean and other warm-weather locales are stereotyped as sex-starved nymphomaniacs lusting after sexually potent dark-skinned men. Where did this myth come from?
3. Western tourist women often do enter into sexual relationships with local men in Belize, where Gorry did her fieldwork, and many other resort locations:
4. The men that tourist women choose seem to lack all the qualities, such as financial resources and status, that #evopsych claims they should have. In an apparent reversal of sex roles, tourist women often provide their sexual partners with substantial financial resources:
5. What's going on? Women tourists unfamiliar w/ the local culture don't recognize the men's low status but do notice universal aspects of their mate quality. First, men display cues of competency & mastery of the physical & social environments, which indicate resource potential:
6. Second, the men exhibit powerful cues of investment and devotion:
8. But in many cases it's a hustle. Local men at the bottom of the economic and ethnic hierarchy learn to feign indicators of romantic love in order to obtain sexual and financial benefits from tourist women:
9. The motivations of the men, however, are not quite so simple:
10. Gorry concludes her dissertation with an analysis of #RomanceNovels. The male heroes are universally portrayed as masters of their physical and social environments...
11. ...and the heroes are obsessed with the heroine.
In ancestral environments, competence and devotion would have been reliable indicators of male mate value, and are probably stronger cues than the evolutionarily novel financial resources often emphasized in #evopsych:
12. If you research sex and mating from an evolutionary perspective, check it out.
13. Her 1994 MA thesis on #femalecompetition looks interesting too (not sure if it's available anywhere):
/end
Postscript. The informants for the romance tourist study:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Does research by @CaraOcobock @Anthrofuentes & others, widely reported in SciAm & elsewhere, finally dispel hunter-gatherer myths that have persisted since the 60's?
In a preprint led by @vivek_vasi The Meanings&Dividends of Man the Hunter we respond🧵 osf.io/preprints/osf/…
2. In 1966, 75 hunter-gatherer specialists met at the University of Chicago for a conference titled Man the Hunter, organized by Richard Lee and Irv DeVore, who were graduate students of Berkeley primatologist Sherwood Washburn.
3. The motivations were to (1) present many new data on hunter-gatherers, and (2) clarify conceptual issues surrounding human evolution. The talks were published in a 1968 volume of the same name, one of the most influential & controversial in anthro: archive.org/details/ManThe…
1. What's at risk by disrupting NIH? With only a bit of hyperbole: a mechanistic understanding of life itself, & therefore better treatments for cancer, dementias, autoimmune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, birth defects, aging & more.
Notes on a revolution interrupted 🧵
2. The cell is the fundamental unit of life. Every thought in your head, every memory, every sensation, every metabolic process in your gut, every defense against infection, every (forgive me) breath you take, every move you make, every word you say, is a cellular process.
3. Cancer and the other diseases noted above are dysfunctions of cellular processes and/or of cell-cell interactions.
2. First, please read this excellent article on the Lynn dataset, which details its racist origins (Lynn: "predominantly white states should declare independence and secede from the Union")... statnews.com/2024/06/20/ric…
3. ...and which also details its deep empirical flaws, such as "selectively includ[ing] samples with particularly low scores for sub-Saharan Africa, while disregarding those with higher scores":
2. Recently @dconroybeam penned an Op-Ed on the harmful use of cherry-picked EP research, citing examples of mass shooters linked to EP-inspired manosphere ideology. He called on EP to do more to "defend our work from misappropriation"
3. Then, @sentientist pushed back, expanding the discussion to racial killings, HG research, and politics, and absolving EP and HG research from responsibility for the bad behavior of others with this central claim:
Sexual reproduction, the recombination of two parental genomes into one offspring genome, is very widespread in eukaryotes. This 2→1 mode of reproduction has many evolutionary consequences...
3. In a very wide range of eurkaryotic species, parental genomes are each packaged into cells (gametes) that exhibit:
1. Much human genetic variation is phenotypically meaningless. Why? Cooperative genes are locked in a forever war w/ selfish genes. The cooperative genes have won most battles but now our genomes are littered with the dead & decaying bodies of a million selfish genes. 🧵
2. Genome sizes vary tremendously in ways that do not obviously relate to organism complexity, e.g., many fish and amphibians have huge genomes compared to mammals (note that the number of base pairs on the x-axis is on a log scale): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_si…
3. Why?
The explanation requires the Williams/Dawkins concept of selfish genetic elements that "enhance their own transmission at the expense of other genes in the genome, even if this has no or a negative effect on organismal fitness": journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a…