Matthew Warwick Profile picture
May 15, 2021 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The King George V class - Fire Control Arrangements

(Not how the maths works - that's far too complicated!)

(1/17)
For the 14-inch guns the centrepiece of the Fire Control System was the Admiralty Fire Control Table (AFCT). The KGVs carried the Mark IX.

(Pictured is Belfast's, a Mk VI, which is smaller).

Each turret also contained an Admiralty Fire Control Box for local control.

(2/17)
The AFCT was buried deep within the ship, under armour, in the Transmitting Station.

The main armament was controlled via the AFCT from one of three locations:

- The forward Director Control Tower
- The aft Director Control Tower
- 'B' Turret

(3/17)
The Director Control Tower (DCT) combined the earlier Director Tower with control personnel. The idea was to avoid coordination problems by combining rangefinding, director and control personnel in one location.

(Shown is a cruiser's, but very similar)

(4/17)
The forward DCT was the principle fire control position. The position was unarmoured, being located high in the ship.

The aft DCT functioned as a back up to the forward director, in case of action damage, and also covered the arcs the forward couldn't see.

(5/17)
The aft DCT was also splinter protected, with 3" of Non Cemented armour plating.

In case both DCTs were out of action, the entire 14-inch battery could be controlled from 'B' turret.

(6/17)
The DCT was designed with a 15 foot (4.6m) rangefinder. In Duke of York, Anson and Howe, the forward DCT had this replaced by a 22 foot (6.7m) model before completion.

(7/17)
Ranges from the DCTs were supplemented from long-base rangefinders in each turret.

'A' and 'Y' turrets had 41 foot (12.5m) models. 'B' turret had a duplex 30 foot (9.1m) model. These could slew 5 degrees either way to allow for deflection.

(8/17)
Designed before radar, the class nonetheless entered service with a set for fire control. King George V entered service with a Type 284 set on her forward DCT. By the end of the war all ships had radar on both DCTs, mostly with the Type 274 which followed the Type 284.

(9/17)
The fire control system proved very successful, perhaps best shown by Duke of York's performance at the Battle of North Cape.

(10/17)
The 5.25-inch guns were controlled by 4 High Angle Director Towers (HADT), in a 'four cornered' arrangement.

Each nominally controlled two of the 5.25-inch turrets and covered that 'quarter'.

(11/17)
King George V and Prince of Wales had Mk IV HADTs. Duke of York, Anson and Howe had Mk V HADTs. Anson later had these replaced with Mk VI towers.

The differences were mostly layout and space - the later ones had better provision for radar, for example.

(12/17)
All four turrets on each side could be connected to either HADT for flexibility / redundency.

Each HADT also had it's own 'High Angle Control Position' (HACP) below armour - a 'transmitting station' for the secondary armament.

(12/17)
Because the 5.25-inch guns were dual purpose, each HACP contained two fire control computers. A High Angle Control System Mk IV* (HACS) for anti-air work and a Admiralty Fire Control Clock Mk VII* (AFCC) for anti-surface work. These were toggled by a simple switch.

(13/17)
The HADTs contained a 15 foot (4.6m) rangefinder, and carried radar from 1941 (generally Type 285, but Anson had these replaced by Type 275 in 1944-45).

(14/17)
As designed, each of the four Octuple Pom Poms had its own director. When the Pom Poms were increased to 6, the number of directors was increased as well, but the one controlling 'B' turret's pom pom was later removed. Ultimately there were 7 directors for the 8 mounts.

(15/17)
These Pom Pom mounts also gained radar - Type 272 - during the war for rangefinding.

Finally, the surviving ships had 2 Quad Bofors mounts, and therefore these had US Mk 51 directors fitted,

(16/17)
Overall, I believe this to be a thorough, successful and well thought out set of fire control arrangements.

Modernisation was proposed post-war but there wasn't the money for this and nothing was done before the ships entered reserve.

(17/17)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Warwick

Matthew Warwick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mpwarwick

Jan 18
A rapid tour through the 59 'big gun' battleships (and battle cruisers) of the Royal Navy - from Dreadnought in 1906 to Vanguard in 1946.

1/26 Image
Dreadnought.

The first all big gun battleship in the world. Several navies had been moving in this direction, but Dreadnought was the first. 10 x 12in guns and capable of 21 knots, she marked a new era of battleship design. She rammed and sunk a U-Boat in 1915.

2/26 Image
Bellerophon, Temeraire, Superb.

The first British follow-on designs to Dreadnought, they largely retained the same layout with minor improvements. All three served at Jutland.

3/26 Image
Read 26 tweets
Jan 13
Why did the Royal Navy only reconstruct 3 ships in the 1930s out of the 10 Queen Elizabeths and Revenges? Why did only Royal Oak of the R class get improved deck armour? Did they plan to reconstruct Barham and Malaya?

The answers involve a dive into RN "large repairs".

1/ Image
Up until 1930 the scrapping schedule was set by the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty.

1935 - 3 x Queen Elizabeths
1936 - 1 x Queen Elizabeth, 1 x Revenge
1937 - 2 x Revenges
1938 - 1 x Revenge
1939 - 1 x Queen Elizabeth
1941 - 1 x Revenge

2/ Image
Under this plan, and given the financial situation of the 1920s and the benign international situation, it wasn't worth giving any of these ships a major modernisation beyond the fitting of anti-torpedo bulges. Nor, to be honest, did the technology exist to do so.

3/ Image
Read 35 tweets
Dec 7, 2024
A windy Saturday morning and a nice high resolution photo strikes me as an opportune time to look at some battleship design features.

1/ Image
Firstly, how do we know this is Warspite?

At a glance, the four twin turrets and tower like superstructure narrow it down to one of the three fully reconstructed Queen Elizabeths. (Vanguard, commissioned 1946, does share these features but she is very distinct!)

2/ Image
To tell Warspite apart from her sisters Queen Elizabeth and Valiant there are a couple of useful tells.

The easiest is the secondary armament. Warspite had a mixed battery - 4 x 6in guns in casemates (red box) and 4 x 4in guns in twin mounts (blue box) on each beam.

3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 1, 2024
I am going to take the liberty of extensively quoting from the end of Friedman's book 'British Carrier Aviation', because I think it makes some important points about aircraft carriers and seapower relevant to today.

1/ Image
"This long story would seem to have several morals. The first and most important is that carriers are valuable because they enhance the flexibility - the crucial element - of seapower. Navies are effective because they can present a great variety of enemies with a wide range

2/
of threats, so that a potential enemy must provide against so wide a range of contingencies as to reduce his capability in any one of them. This is a natural consequence of the mobility of navies as compared to ground (and associated air) forces.

3/
Read 17 tweets
Nov 22, 2024
Was looking through a copy of Janes Fighting Ships 2009-10 this week. Comparing the fleet then and the theoretical or anticipated replacement plans to what actually happened is depressing.

A grim thread...

1/18
Attack Submarines.

In 2009 there were 8 in service (1 Swiftsure, 7 Trafalgars). Sceptre was to decommission in 2010 with Astutes replacing the Trafalgars on a 1-to-1 basis between 2009 and 2022. Astute boat 5 was due to commission in 2017.

2/18 Image
Today we have 6 in service - theoretically (1 Trafalgar, 5 Astutes). Triumph is life extended to 2025. Astute boat 5 commissioned in 2022, 5 years late. Astute boats 2 and 3 haven't been to sea for years.

3/18 Image
Read 19 tweets
Oct 31, 2024
The battleship HMS Vanguard. She is often derided for being armed with ‘her Great Aunt’s teeth’.

This is due to her being equipped with four spare 15-inch turrets from storage, previously used on Courageous and Glorious prior to their conversion into carriers.

1/14 Image
These turrets were ordered in 1913-14 and consequently were some 30 years old by the time Vanguard entered service in 1946. This, however, does her firepower a great disservice. This can be seen by looking at each element of the main armament.

2/14 Image
The Gun:

The 15”/42 was the most successful British battleship gun to ever go to sea. It was reliable, it was accurate and it was consistent. It remained very highly regarded by its users during the Second World War despite its age.

3/14 Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(