Reminded today how Oregon's "progressive" Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum did everything in her power to make this horrific decision a reality. Last year, took Louisiana's side. Argued for non-unanimous juries. This year, argued against retroactive justice. Not just. Not right.
THREAD: 100s remain caged based on a KKK-era law to silence Black jurors. Oregon AG Ellen Rosenblum's claiming she's doing all she can. The opposite. She just helped the ultra-conservative Supreme Court block justice. It is time to set the record straight.
First, a background on the law: Most think of the KKK in terms of physical violence. Intimidation. But they also used legal & legislative process to pass laws exacting legal violence. In Oregon they pushed a law to silence jurors. "Non-unanimous juries."
In Louisiana in 1898, the KKK pushed non-unanimous juries to “establish the supremacy of the white race" & “ensure African-American juror service would be meaningless.” In 1934, Oregon joined them. At the time of the law’s passage there were *34,000+ active KKK members in Oregon.
Impact: Black people are already less likely to be selected to be on a jury. More likely to be accused of crime. Non-unanimous juries led to disproportionate convictions. *They would have never been convicted & sent to prison anywhere else in the country.* The KKK got their way.
Current Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum was once a state judge. Presided over countless non-unanimous juries. Sentenced Terrence Hayes to 13 years in 2004. "While I was not kidnapped by white men in hoods, I was caged because of their law."usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
The impact of non-unanimous Jim Crow juries has not only been felt by those locked up because of them. Non-white jurors were demoralized. Attacked by their "peers." Shut up. Silenced. Cash Spencer: “It breaks my heart. The system is not built for me.”
Enter Calvin Duncan. Former jailhouse lawyer wrongfully imprisoned for close to 30 years. Learned about non-unanimous juries while inside. When released in 2011, he didn't relax. Filed petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court 22 times over 7 years. Denied every time. He kept fighting.
Finally in 2019, on Calvin's 23rd attempt, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case to end non-unanimous verdicts.
Most of Oregonian's significant leaders past & present joined a powerful brief asking the Supreme Court to topple this law.
*But not Oregon AG Ellen Rosenblum!*
Instead of joining Oregon's most powerful leaders--bipartisan--to petition the Supreme Court to finally topple the racist stain on Oregon's past/present, *Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum joined LOUISIANA* to ask the Supreme Court to keep the racist law alive & thriving.
Fortunately, the Supreme Court didn't listen to Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum. In April 2020, the they finally acknowledged what was long obvious: This racist law was unconstitutional. Gorsuch wrote opinion. Here's Calvin Duncan celebrating on the Supreme Court steps:
Despite her fight in the Supreme Court to maintain the racist status quo, Oregon AG Ellen Rosenblum still claimed to be happy about the ruling in Ramos. Called it "important & welcomed." Now able to move past "embarrassing stain on our progressive state." But she kept fighting.
Ramos v. Louisiana only applied to future cases. Not those unlucky enough to be convicted too long before the decision. So Ellen Rosenblum fought *every single person convicted in the past from having the opportunity to have a new, fair trial.*
Then fought in the Supreme Court.
The case the Supreme Court just decided--Edwards v. Vannoy--was about whether a law even this ultra-conservative Supreme Court ruled was racist, should be applied (fancy legal term coming your way) "retroactively." Meaning to people still burdened by an unconstitutional law.
After Rosenblum tried to save face by hailing the Ramos decision as an important decision, she was right back in the Supreme Court, asking the ultra-Conservatives to rule just as they did today in Edwards. A big "NO" to retroactive justice. No to toppling a racist legal monument.
The result of Ellen Rosenblum fighting every single case in Oregon courts & arguing forcefully to maintain the impact of white supremacy in the Supreme Court: Not just a major loss on this one issue. A Supreme Court decision damaging to millions impacted by other issues to come.
Terrence Hayes--sentenced by the current AG Ellen Rosenblum in 2004 based on the racist KKK law to silence Black jurors--explained what is at stake in Edward, what "retroactivity" & "retroactive justice" means, better than anyone. I'll pull out quotes: usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
"When new rules are announced by the Supreme Court, they don’t automatically get applied “retroactively.” That means for all of us unlucky enough to have been victims of laws the Court deems brutal & racist before they ultimately say so we are condemned to continue to suffer."
"When the Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that immigrants are denied effective assistance of counsel when not informed of consequences of guilty pleas, countless people already deported, torn from families, convicted or otherwise locked up before the decision were denied any relief."
"When the Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that juries — not judges —were the only ones who could ultimately decide to condemn someone to death, those already on death row, facing down the end of their lives because of the whim of a single judge, received no mercy."
"And when the Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that juveniles must be specially protected against police interrogation, all those convicted as juveniles then serving time, or burdened forever by the scarlet letter of a conviction, had no second chance."
Terrence Hayes: "I am free now. However, still bound by the chains of an unconstitutional conviction. I’m also bound by trauma & guilt. Went to jail at 20. My 2 baby daughters stripped from me. Wasn’t able to be there to support them as they grew. I also was unable to grow up."
But here's the critical point: "We don’t have to rely on the Supreme Court — states have the power to provide retroactive justice." States & state leaders always have the power to provide MORE rights than the Supreme Court says.
Ellen Rosenblum can act TODAY to make this right.
Oregon AG Ellen Rosenblum can act. Right now. Her claim she has to follow the ultra-conservative Supreme Court for guidance on Justice in Oregon is both false & a supremely dangerous precedent to set. As Chelsea Clinton put it: State leaders can/must act:
A growing chorus. Director of ACLU: Ellen Rosenblum stopped defending Oregon's same-sex marriage ban bc "she knew defending the law was wrong. Now, she should do justice by refusing to defend Oregon’s unconstitutional convictions by non-unanimous juries." portlandmercury.com/blogtown/2021/…
Human Rights Watch (@hrw) wrote AG Ellen Rosenblum a powerful letter calling her failure to use her power to allow people convicted by a racist KKK law to have a fair trial unburdened by discriminatory juries “inconsistent w/ international human rights standards." Just wow.
There is now a new coalition of over 40 organizations, including Oregon's ACLU (@ACLU_OR), calling on otherwise "progressive" Oregon AG to use stop fighting relief for hundreds still caged simply bc they were unlucky enough to get convicted too long ago.
Over 30,000 people have signed this petition, calling on Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum to use her power to stop opposing retroactive justice to hundreds still imprisoned based on a law everyone including Rosenblum acknowledges is racist. act.colorofchange.org/sign/People_st…
All Oregon advocates are asking for from Ellen Rosenblum is she stop opposing requests from hundreds still in prison. That she listen to her community, the local ACLU, Human Rights Watch, people & families directly impacted. That way, local DA's can then decide whether to retry.
These calls to action do not change because of the Supreme Court case. Fundamental to our Democracy. The Constitution (which the Supreme Court interprets) sets the FLOOR. States can always provide more rights. More critical today than ever. We are not bound by Justice Kavanaugh.
What you can do: Please watch & share this video, featuring Calvin Duncan, the former jailhouse lawyer & law student, who got the Supreme Court to strike down non-unanimous juries & say they're racist. His call for freedom rings truer today.
What you can do: Please watch & share this video, featuring Cash Spencer, a juror whose voice was silenced by a system designed to silence the opinions of Black jurors so the KKK could convict whoever they wanted to. That system is still alive today.
What you can do: Please sign/share this petition calling on Oregon Attorney General to do the only thing that is right--for her & other state leaders--and use the power she has to do her part to end systemic racism & injustice. Critical now more than ever. act.colorofchange.org/sign/People_st…
What you can do: Visit the Still in Prison Coalition website below, follow @stillinprison on Twitter, and sign up for updates. If you're a journalist, please get in touch & I'll forward you on to the right person to speak with. Stillinprison.org
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My new op-ed is now live. In it, I explain how it's *legal to execute an innocent person* in the U.S. How that's a feature, not bug of the system. And what we can do about it now. Hint: Robust public defense. Teen Vogue again leading the way with truth. teenvogue.com/story/robert-r…
It is legal in the U.S. to execute an innocent person. Indeed, the Supreme Court has twice ruled it is perfectly constitutional to do so bc the value of expediency & finality in the legal process is more important than truth, justice, & even human life.teenvogue.com/story/robert-r…
As a civil rights attorney who served as a public defender, I saw how killing an innocent person was the most extreme example of a legal process designed *not to achieve justice, fairness, or truth, but enable unjust outcomes & erect every obstacle toward redress.
There is no evidence that police in the subways are lowering crime. What we do know: NYPD is swallowing up valuable resources, harassing New Yorkers, making needless arrests, & engaging in violent & reckless confrontations on the subway.
City records show a $151 million increase in 2023 for NYPD overtime pay for subway policing. NYC went from spending $4 million in 2022 on NYPD overtime pay for subway policing to $155 million in 2023.
In addition to the $150mil+ extra spent on NYPD for subway policing in overtime alone in 2023,
NYC Eric Adams ordered NYPD in March 2024 to send an another “800 police officers specifically to keep watch on turnstiles." apnews.com/article/new-yo…
Pay attention. 800,000 incarcerated workers are currently forced to labor in prisons for pennies.
Don’t believe me? Read on for first hand accounts from inside. Slavery is alive in the US. Thread:
Cell blocks, prison grounds, kitchens, laundry rooms, libraries, medical centers — these are the common spaces that make up America’s vast carceral architecture.
Grounds: "My first job in the prison system was on yard crew. The duties include digging through trash bags to collect recyclables. The pay for some positions in this prison is 8 cents an hour.
I remember feeling degraded and humiliated. ” Tasha in Texas.
Wow. Fiona Apple is a real one. Watch this video. Calling for donations to bail out Black mothers for Mother’s Day. Her fans already came through w donations & spreading the word. Over $30k! Let’s “fetch the bolt cutters” & support even more. I just gave. givebutter.com/nHSrnp
Two years ago, Fiona Apple popped up on a zoom call to get trained by local organizers to Court watch. Dedicated ever since. Her work has led to freedom, lawsuits, accountability.
The stories all here in this short video. She wrote & performed the score:
Be like Fiona Apple. Volunteer to CourtWatch. Visit this campaign hub, learn more, connect w/ a local courtwatch program, &/or learn how to start your own.
Injustice happens in empty courtrooms. Which allows police brutality to continue outside of them. Courtwatch.org
“No judge has ever lost their job setting bail on someone.”
A NYC judge whispered that. To a public defender. Before depriving their destitute client of freedom. This happens every day. Judges are intimidated to throw poor people in cages.
Thread on a history of intimidation:
Public defenders @elizaorlins & @APetrigh tell about the open secret of "justice" throughout the country People are deprived of liberty, not based on merit. But judicial fear of negative press.
"The NYPD’s recent social media attack against a judge who released a defendant under supervision instead of setting bail and detaining them. The case drew headlines because the NYPD’s aggressive social media posts were full of misinformation, including misidentifying the judge."
How copaganda works. Police, prosecutor, & prison interests use media to exaggerate & lie about "sensational" cases. Amplify them on repeat. Create the *perception* that "crime" or "migrants" are a "Crisis!"
Perpetual anger/fear buys votes & public opinion. Facts be damned.
How copaganda works. Police release a highly edited video that doesn't include their unprovoked, violent, & unjustified attack on a migrant. Manufactured "outcry" ensues. Lawmakers call for sweeping policy changes. New video later released. It's too late. Profound damage done.
How copaganda works. Even after previously withheld police footage showed the "attack on police" in Times Square was the opposite: An unprovoked attack *by police* on innocent people, reports continue only center the lie.
None (that I've seen) report on the overt police lie.