In Feb 2020, we spotted a mysterious LLC that gave $150k to Collins’ super PAC just 5 weeks after forming. That timeline indicated that the money came from elsewhere.
The FBI investigation revealed that we were right: the LLC was not the true source of the $150K contribution to the Collins super PAC.
Instead, the money apparently came from Navatek. Navatek gave the LLC $150K one day, and the LLC gave the super PAC $150K the next day.
Navatek is a federal contractor, and contractors are prohibited from making political contributions.
So not only does it appear that Navatek violated the straw donor ban by funneling a super PAC contribution through an LLC, it also violated the contractor contribution ban. Bad!
Navatek's CEO, Martin Kao, appears to have TOLD super PAC officials that he and his company should get credit for the $150K donation made in the name of a sham LLC.
Super PACs are prohibited from accepting a contribution if they know the money came from another source, btw.
This is a reminder that dark money is only "dark" when it comes to the public's knowledge: the beneficiaries of dark money often know where the funds are coming from.
The public had no idea who "SYWSE LLC" was or where the $150K came from, but Collins' super PAC sure did.
This is also a reminder that dark money donors often have something to hide!
Here, Navatek could not lawfully donate to Collins' super PAC because it was a federal contractor. So it tried to keep its name off of the super PAC's FEC reports by laundering the money through an LLC.
The FBI is also probing how Kao and Navatek illegally reimbursed employees and family members for their contributions to Collins' campaign.
Taken together, the timeline and available evidence sure make it look like Kao & Navatek illegally poured money into Collins' race as gratitude for her help in landing an $8M taxpayer-funded contract...
In Aug 2019, Collins announced that she helped secure Navatek's contract.
In Sept 2019, Navatek’s CEO, Kao, emailed Collins’ campaign finance director and thanked COLLINS for her support.
Typically, a campaign thanks a donor for their help, rather than the other way around.
Also in Sept 2019, around the same time that Kao was offering Collins additional "help...financially or whatever," Navatek illegally laundered contributions to Collins’ campaign in the name of others.
Then, in Nov 2019, Kao sets up an LLC "pretty vaguely."
In Dec 2019, Kao emails super PAC officials (subject line "Navatek/Martin Kao") telling them to expect a contribution in the name of the LLC.
Within weeks, Navatek gave to the LLC, and the LLC then gave to the super PAC.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“It is hard to see how Sinema can credibly argue that luxury hotels, meal expenses, and extensive air travel are connected to her candidacy or officeholder duties, given that she is no longer a candidate or officeholder,” I told @NOTUSreports. A few thoughts: 🧵
While in office, campaign expenditures for luxury travel can be justified when connected to a fundraising event. But Sinema isn’t fundraising for a campaign—because she doesn’t have one. And she no longer has official duties.
Some of the wildest outlays are for Sinema’s “security detail.”
The need for personal security might arise from Sinema’s old role in the Senate, so there’s a fair argument that former lawmakers should be allowed to use leftover campaign funds for certain security expenses.
Elon Musk secretly routed tens of millions of dollars into the 2022 election to fund Citizens for Sanity and other dark money groups, the @WSJ reports.
Musk routed his 2022 political spending through a 501c4 nonprofit called “Building America's Future," @WSJ reveals.
BAF then sent $43M to Citizens for Sanity, a group housed at the Conservative Partnership Institute, as @ItsDocumented reported in May theguardian.com/us-news/articl…
The Musk-backed dark money group, BAF, also routed $1M in 2022 to a super PAC managed at the time by Musk’s close ally Kevin McCarthy.
Super PACs must disclose their donors, but routing the funds through a dark money nonprofit disguised the true source of the funds.
The myth of noncitizen voting is being pushed by a well-funded network of far-right groups, as part of an intentional and coordinated strategy to erode democracy for all Americans.
First, elevating conspiracies about noncitizen voting lays the groundwork to call the 2024 results into question if far-right Republicans don’t like the outcome.
Second, these conspiracies are being used to advance strict voting laws and policies that ultimately disenfranchise U.S. citizens.
One of the big trends this election cycle has been the Trump campaign outsourcing its ground game operation to super PACs backed by Elon Musk and other billionaires.
But a big question is how these supposedly “independent” operations can lawfully share data with the campaign.1/
This outsourcing trend has been supercharged by a recent FEC advisory opinion that allows “independent” super PACs and outside groups to coordinate directly with campaigns on canvassing activities. fec.gov/files/legal/ao…
However, in that same advisory opinion, the FEC stated explicitly that it would be illegal for a super PAC to hand over its data to a campaign.
But every Trump-backing, canvassing-oriented super PAC has publicly announced a data-sharing agreement.
NEW: secret materials from ALEC’s July meeting reveal the nationally-coordinated effort to manufacture conspiracies about noncitizen voting…in order to push longstanding right-wing policy priorities that undermine the freedom to vote for U.S. citizens. rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
Last month, Trump lawyer Cleta Mitchell told a room full of ALEC lawmakers that the fake threat of noncitizen voting should be used to justify making it harder for college students to vote.
Mitchell also urged lawmakers to use noncitizen voting—which again, doesn’t really happen—as a pretext to eliminate same day registration for U.S. citizens.
Earlier this year, an election conspiracy theory group misinterpreted FEC data to declare a prolific Virginia donor as a “ghost donor.”
They didn’t mention that the donor is a wealthy Republican giving to Trump and other Republicans through the GOP fundraising platform WinRed.
These ill-informed claims get warped on their way to Charlie Kirk, who last week demanded an AG investigation into ActBlue because a GOP donor was making contributions through WinRed.