2/ in this article, Joseph Kannarkat and I break down all the tools that the Biden administration and @SecBecerra have to address competition beyond antitrust reviews
3/ first of all, if the Biden administration chooses to elevate health care competition as a priority, it may garner rare bipartisan support.
This is an issue that has support from left (@ZekeEmanuel) and right (@Avik) thought leaders and legislators.
4/ removing perverse incentives to consolidate in payment policies can arrest or reverse hospital-physician consolidation.
The appeals court upheld @CMSGov ability to enact site-neutral payments.
they need to be expanded beyond office visits to other services, like ultrasounds
5/ fight against state-level anticompetitive ploys
"Certificate of Need" is often abused to grant local monopolies that then drive up prices
CMS has set the precedent of saying "if there's a CON, we will provide additional flexibilities on network adequacy"- they can go further
6/ Enforce against holding data hostage.
I joined 5 other former national coordinators for Health IT in an unprecedented letter that supported using CMS Conditions of Participation as a tool for ensuring data sharing of hospital events.
We have a final rule, but no enforcement
7/ the FTC and DOJ should review physician non-competes.
They shouldn't be used to stifle competition if physicians find that hospital (or private equity) employment was not all they hoped it would be
8/ @JoeBiden was the first presidential candidate of a major party to explicitly call out the need to tackle market concentration in healthcare
But they can go beyond antitrust authority to ensure better care and lower costs for all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ When Walmart enters any business you can expect that they will leverage their massive scale to get better economics, create value for customers- and drive out local mom and pop competitors
Thats what many assumed would happen w primary care clinics
but it didn't
why not?
2/ The first thing I have to acknowledge is to rule out "execution"
They aren't perfect (their Athena and Epic EMR travails show that) but Walmart knows how to execute, and they won't scale something until they've figured out how to make it profitable.
They couldn't
3/ To their credit, they tried a lot of permutations over the past 10 years, and strictly as an operator, you have to give them respect that they could be a force
- Third party vendor
- Walmart Health clinics
-Oak St Health
- Own clinics + telehealth
You've read the headlines ("Medicare pay cuts partially averted") but to understand what led us here--and what's to come-- we need to go deeper
Also, some cool tangents on effective/ineffective financial incentives
2/ let's walk through the weeds of
"a temporary patch on an expiring pandemic patch for the unintended consequences of a good-will effort to fix pay imbalance between primary care & specialists, made worse by a failure to predict future inflation, w a sop to value-based pay"
3/ The "failure to predict medical inflation"
remember the annual "doc fix" scramble? it was because the "sustainable growth rate" was indexed to inflation, which was near zero for years. So Congress had to constantly step in to reverse its own past efforts to control costs. 😧
1/ Let's flip through the Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule just out, w shared savings focus
Here's a little trick to get past all the pesky comments (that people spent 1000's of hours developing and submitting), and right to the meat of the matter:
CTRL-F "we are finalizing"
2/ First up: we want to increase participation!
strong evidence for providing upfront capital, especially to rural, underserved, low income ACOs (see AIM)
Good idea to expand it 👍
Lots of comments about eligibility criteria, repayment, etc etc.
"finalized as proposed"
3/ We want to increase participation!
Let's allow folks to stay in one sided risk for longer, especially lower income (no hospital) ACOs