I've been out on vacation for a few days so haven't posted this daily chart, but now that I'm back, time to talk about a not-so-good week the Biden administration is having.
After two straight weeks of progress, the number of kids in custody has unexpectedly hit a plateau.
One of the reasons this week hasn't seen a plateau is that there are a few hundred more unaccompanied children coming to the border this week compared to last week. But that could easily be normal variance and the trendline is still good.
The real concern is releases from ORR custody to sponsors. Last week was the first week since the Biden administration began reporting daily numbers that we saw the average number of children released to sponsors go *down.* And this week is on track for another drop!
The combination of falling numbers of releases to sponsors and (as of this week) a small increase in unaccompanied children coming to the border means that the trendline on net changes in children in custody has been going in the wrong direction for a few days.
All of this could easily be a few day speed bump and we could see numbers start going back down again within the next week or so.
This isn't the first time we've seen a speed bump in this process either. So this could easily be normal variance.
This week shows that the Biden administration's response to unaccompanied children is still quite fragile. Lots of successes but we're not out of the woods.
To end this thread with some good news, we're about to drop below 20,000 kids in custody for the first time since April 6.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This makes NO SENSE. A 13-year-old was arrested by local police for unknown reasons, and then turned over to ICE, which is detaining him far away from his mother — who is going through immigration court, has an asylum application on file, and is legally authorized to work.
Important context from @TriciaOhio that I'm posting in the interest of fairness. I do not automatically trust it given that she has made multiple inaccurate claims in the past (including even yesterday). IF true, it would at least provide an explanation.
@TriciaOhio To be clear, absolutely none of that information is included in public reporting on this story and the Everett Police Department did not give any statement to the Boston Globe about the initial arrest. Tricia is the the first person to ever give this info.
UPDATE: Judge Perry’s opinion blocking the Texas National Guard deployment in Chicago is out!
She begins with Alexander Hamilton’s rejection of a “preposterous” idea that the Constitution lets a President deploy a State’s militia to a different State for political retribution.
Judge Perry spends four pages going over the history of the debates around the Constitution as to the proper relationship of the President to a state militia, especially after overthrowing the British, who had maintained standing armies in the colonies against their wishes.
The Trump admin says Trump is authorized to deploy the Texas National Guard to Chicago under the specific law below. They say there is:
- (2) a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of US
- (3) the President is “unable with regular forces to execute the laws.”
Stephen Miller has now declared this Trump-appointed judge an insurrectionist.
To emphasize, the judge painstakingly examined all the protest happening in Portland before Trump activated the Guard. She noted that there hadn't been any violence at a protest since mid-July.
Here's how Judge Immergut summarized the last two and a half months of protests at the ICE facility in Portland; they "generally were limited to fewer than 30 people and were 'largely sedate.'"
Stephen Miller's efforts to claim insurrection in this decision is pure propaganda.
Here are the FOUR incidents the Trump admin said justified federalizing the Guard.
- Some protesters displayed a makeshift guillotine.
- A picture of an unmarked ICE vehicle was posted online.
- Protesters twice shined high-power flashlights at ICE officers' faces.
In this raid, they dragged naked children out of their homes and put them into U-Haul vans. And now they're bragging about it.
U.S. citizens had their doors smashed down and were forced into handcuffs and held outside for hours. Senior citizens held outside, their homes trashed.
It was 37 people in the raid highlighted in the video posted by @DHSGov. The 900 number is for the entire Chicago operation over the last couple weeks.
Provide a single piece of evidence that anything I posted above is wrong. One.
Am I lying that Emergency Medicaid (1986) and Cuban/Haitian Entrant Assistance (1980) are not "Biden-era"? Am I making it up that the OBBBA doesn't eliminate either?
So in response to my entirely correct statement that Vance is not telling the truth (in multiple respects) about what the Democrats are demanding in the shutdown, you bring up a completely unrelated issue that is not impacted by the shutdown debate at all?
🚨A dangerous moment for America. If the normal police ever pulled something like this — pulling every single person out of an apartment building and handcuffing them to run checks — they would be sued into oblivion. It's beyond unconstitutional. Yet DHS is laughing about it!
🚨What @DHSGov pulled in Chicago on Tuesday is insanely unconstitutional. They raided an apartment building, smashed down every door and dragged entire families into the street, and detained everyone for hours ("Kavanaugh stops").
One U.S. citizen was held for FIVE HOURS.
@DHSgov 🚨Another U.S. citizen, a senior citizen, had his door smashed in and was dragged out of his apartment in zip ties. He was detained for THREE HOURS. No one at ICE or DHS ever showed him a warrant for anything.