The ceasefire is of course good news, and we hope it will hold out for as long as possible. But it's only a matter of time until the next round of fighting; a question of when, not if. Because as long as we continue holding Palestinians under occupation, violence is inevitable.
We may no longer be dropping bombs on Gaza from the sky—for the time being—but today, like every day for years now, we control who enters/leaves the Strip, imports/exports, airspace & sea access. Gaza is still under our control not only during the operations but between them too.
Israel sees operations in Gaza as a necessary evil—having to periodically "mow the lawn" to keep the 2million people there under control. And every time, the red lines we crossed in the previous operation become the starting point of the next one. An endless spiral of violence.
None of this absolves Hamas of responsibility for attacking civilians. But as an Israeli org & as former soldiers who perpetuated the occupation, we have a responsibility to speak out against it before the next time soldiers are sent to kill and be killed to uphold this reality.
There's a lot to say about Gaza, but the events of the last few days took place in Israel too. Horrific violence between Israeli Jews & Palestinians erupted on the streets, much of it due to the active encouragement & flame-fanning of Kahanist (Jewish Supremacist) politicians.
There were even calls for the military to be brought into Israeli towns, after settlers & Kahanists played a vital role in shaking up the fragile coexistence. Their model: Hebron in the West Bank, where they've largely succeeded in making segregation the norm in the city center.
The international community has shown great interest, solidarity and involvement over the last ten days. Now is the time to take that message one step further and demand that the occupation — of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank — is brought to a full stop.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The US deadline to improve humanitarian conditions in northern Gaza has expired, and the IDF's mass bombing and starvation campaign to expel its residents has worsened. The IDF clearly stated - residents won’t be allowed to return
In other words: ethnically cleansing the area 🧵
After the IDF already split Gaza in two with an ever expanding Netzarim corridor (named after a settlement evicted from Gaza in 2005), it built another corridor in the north, cutting Gaza City off from Jabalya, Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahia. A siege within a siege within a siege.
In October the IDF drastically decreased the amount of aid entering northern Gaza, publicly stating none would enter north of Gaza City for over a month. Attempting to justify this to the public, the IDF claimed there were no civilians in the area - a blatant and abhorrent lie.
"You went into Gaza for revenge. As much as possible. Women, children, anyone in sight."
The funeral which sent shockwaves through social media, the jarring quotes that nearly all major Israeli news outlets chose to omit, and what they say about the IDF’s policies on the ground🧵
A recap: IDF reservist Shuvael Ben Natan was killed in Lebanon last week. During his funeral, his brother said he entered Gaza to take revenge on women and children. A fellow soldier said he became the platoon's "jokester" when he torched a house without approval "for the vibes."
These more damning descriptions of Ben Natan oddly didn't make it onto the many Israeli news sites which reported on said funeral. According to @the7i, most Israeli sites which reported on it chose to cut these parts out. One outlet even edited them out of the video completely.
About 100 people were killed on Monday in an IDF strike on Beit Lahia in northern Gaza. The IDF said the building was bombed after 4 soldiers were killed by an IED nearby, and a “lookout” was detected on its roof. A 5-story building, around 200 people - bombed for a “lookout” 🧵
About 20 of those who died in the bombing were children. Dozens were trapped under the rubble, some of whom were taking shelter after being driven out of the bombed areas of Jabaliya and Beit Hanoun. For a lookout. But what does the IDF mean when they say someone is a “lookout”?
A soldier who took part in the 2014 ground invasion of Gaza, told us how two women in an orchard were targeted and killed for allegedly being "lookouts," because they were seen "with cellphones, talking, walking" and it was assumed that they could see the forces.
Yesterday, as thousands were fleeing from northern Gaza under threat of starvation and bombing in what is in all likelihood an implementation of the "Generals' Plan," Netanyahu's Likud Party held a "Gaza resettlement conference" nearby, overlooking the charred houses of Be'eri 🧵
The conference area was designated a “restricted military zone,” and protesters against it, many of whom are the still-displaced residents of Be’eri and families of hostages, were blocked from entering. They want a ceasefire and a hostage deal - that’s why they were pushed aside.
A month ago, Netanyahu said he was considering the Generals’ Plan. A week ago he said the same thing. Between those two statements, were multiple weeks of no food entering northern Gaza, coupled with mass bombings. Now, his party hosts a conference to say out loud what he won’t.
This weekend, the IDF bombed a hospital in Jabalya and a residential complex in Beit Lahia, killing at least 120 in those two strikes alone, including many women and children.
But again, they utter the magic words “precise munitions,” trying to justify another mass killing 🧵
Unsurprisingly though, the dead don’t seem to care how “precise” the weapons were. And while the army may have considered them “acceptable collateral damage,” basic moral norms say otherwise. Especially when the list of “acceptable” targets includes humanitarian safe zones.
For example, let's say the IDF fires a precision missile precisely into the Al-Tabaeen school that houses masses of displaced Gazans, like it did in early August. Was a disaster of over 90 deaths, including children, avoided? No.
Soldiers have been testifying to us for years about the ambiguous and unofficial authority that settlers (mostly Civilian Security Coordinators - CSCs) hold over IDF soldiers. Cementing this authority as official policy is just more proof of our govt's messianic-settler agenda.
"the CSC said, 'I am the commander on the field, I give the orders, when the army arrives I direct it.' The message, at the end of the day, is that during an incident it’s the CSC who directs the army, not the army that directs the CSC"
Hebron area | 2013 breakingthesilence.org.il/testimonies/da…
To learn more about Civilian Security Coordinators and settler influence on our military, our 2017 book "The High Command" is available in full for free here: breakingthesilence.org.il/inside/wp-cont…