Unbelievable! USCIS delayed the #H2B rule for 55 days past employer's start dates. Then tells them all that their labor certifications are "out of date" if the start date was more than 45 days ago, forcing them to redo the whole process. Wonder why we've got illegal immigration?
I'm certain that #H2B employers will do this, but it is absolutely ridiculous and unfair to employers that are trying to follow the law. They met all the requirements. They did everything right, and now USCIS says they have to redo it b/c the agency messed up. Unbelievable.
USCIS says every employer under this rule will have to prove "irreparable harm" if they don't get visas and that the visas will help preserve US workers jobs. Yet it is arbitrarily capping the number of visas at 1/3 the number Congress allowed. It doesn't even try to justify it
It's literally baked into the rule that companies who don't get visas will face irreparable harm and that US workers will suffer, and USCIS even says so. Yet it's still moving forward with this 22K cap when Congress gave them 64K
I love this. USCIS says we're acting to prevent "serious economic harm to the H-2B community" but then never acknowledges that the 22K will cause that as well. Also, never acknowledges that it wouldn't need to bypass comments if it proposed the rule in Dec or Jan or Feb or Mar!
Here's the reason. Economically obtuse labor union advocacy. Unemployment is *always* higher in these occupations because the jobs are inherently temporary, so more stints of unemployment are guaranteed. That's why US workers are less likely to apply!
I explain this issue in my #H2B paper. More stints of unemployment, but of much shorter duration. cato.org/publications/p…
Why is this issue so important? Because H-2 visas are the main or only way for poor foreign workers without families already here to come to the United States legally. Saying you don't want H-2B workers is basically just saying you don't want poor workers coming.
Here's a bizarre thing. USCIS will reallocate the visas set aside for Central America to other countries if they aren't used by July 8 to "help ensure that supplemental H-2B visas do not go unused." Your whole rule is about ensuring that most supplemental visas *do* go unused!
So USCIS is undermining the efficacy of the Central American set-aside in an effort to make sure that visas don't go unused. Why not just make the other visas available? What on Earth is going on here?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Courts have found that DHS has repeatedly violated 4th Amendment. In Garrison G. v. Bondi, the Court found DHS violated Garrison’s 4th amendment right by entering his home without a judicial warrant. He was one of several victims of MN home invasions storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
In USA v. Juarez-Lopez, the Court found DHS detained numerous employees of a NY manufacturing plant without basis. The only reason we know about it is b/c DHS tried to criminally charge Juarez-Lopez, and the judge suppressed the evidence storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
The NY raid occurred AFTER DHS tried and failed to secure a judicial warrant in a similar case in Texas to go into a business without probable cause to interrogate the workers about their status. Undeterred, DHS went ahead with no relevant warrant in NY cases.justia.com/federal/distri…
Courts have found DHS has violated the First Amendment many times, in different contexts. In LA Press Club v. Noem, the Ninth Circuit found that DHS regularly assaults people for peacefully protesting and observing its activities. aclusocal.org/cases/la-press…
In Suri v. Trump, the 4th Circuit found that DHS retaliated against a Georgetown post-doctoral scholar and teacher by arresting him for his online speech. ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/25156…
In Ozturk v. Trump, the Court found that DHS arrested a college student for writing an op-ed, which was "at the very least, a substantial claim of a First Amendment violation" sufficient to justify release from custody. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/US…
A man called the Palm Beach County police to get a welfare check on his 4-year-old daughter, and instead, they tackled him, tased him, and arrested him being an asylum applicant. "Too f**king bad!" one deputy screamed. Local cops following ICE's playbook for $$.
“He just wanted to know about his daughter,” his girlfriend cried. “Why would you guys do this?”The deputy who arrested Sanchez Toledo was part of the sheriff’s office’s 287(g) Task Force that allows police to enforce immigration law. themarshallproject.org/2026/05/11/flo…
ICE bribes the localities to make arrests. The localities lie to the public about what their goals and duties are because that's what ICE has trained them to do. themarshallproject.org/2026/05/11/flo…
One in four people raised Muslim have left Islam, which means that all polls of Muslim opinion substantially understate the degree of Muslim immigrant assimilation since leaving Islam is a type of assimilation. In my post today I document how big this bias...
Muslims who were raised Muslim (not converts) basically look like Evangelical Christians, with gay acceptance being underwater by 21 points. But looking at all people raised Muslim completely eliminates this 21-point deficit because ex-Muslims are so liberal.
As we would expect, Muslim immigrant assimilation continues across generations, with each generation more favorable than the prior generation, especially when including ex-Muslims. This understates the trend b/c we don't have the children of ex-Muslims who are not raised Muslim.
Today @CatoInstitute published our report providing the first look at the fiscal effects of the wave of legal & illegal immigration over the last 3 decades. It shows immigrants created surpluses every year, by a combined $14.5 trillion, even as deficits grew
Our report covers all spending, federal, state, and local, updating the work of the National Academies' 2017 report. You can read my summary: cato.org/blog/cato-stud…
Or the full study: cato.org/white-paper/im…
How can new people cut the deficit? First, a significant portion of spending is "pure public goods," military & interest payments on old debt, that don't increase b/c of immigrants. This means the average new person is paying more in taxes than they receive in benefits...