@mjmauboussin and Callahan recently published a piece highlighting Customer-based Corporate Valuation (CBCV) which works particularly well for subscription businesses.
Here are my notes.
2/ Subscription based businesses’ topline grew 17.8% in 2012-2020 period whereas S&P 500 grew sales ~2% during the same time.
Digital subscription has also expanded TAM significantly for some businesses.
$NYT print subscription in 1996: 1.1 mn vs digital subs in 2021: 5.3 mn
3/ The CBCV framework appears simple: customer value comes from existing and future customers. Of course, the devil is the details.
Let’s get to it.
4/ Customers
As you can gauge, customers are at the heart of CBCV framework.
In order to assess the opportunity, we need to have a good understanding of current customers but more importantly, the size of future customers.
5/ How do we increase TAM?
“One way to increase the TAM is to figure out how to convert near customers, who are close to buying the good or service, into customers”
“Rivalry has countervailing effects on a market. On the one hand, competitors tend to draw resources to the...
6/ "...market. That accelerates adoption.
On the other hand, competition tends to hurt profitability in the short run. The same promotions that generate customer growth also penalize CLV through lower profits and higher CACs.”
7/ It is a grave mistake to assume customers are a homogeneous bunch. Innovators and early adopters have low CAC, but as you move to “early majority” and “late majority”, CAC tends to rise and profitability per customer falls.
8/ With time, adoption curve in technology has accelerated.
Time required for 1 Bn MAU:
Facebook: 8 yrs
WhatsApp: 7 yrs
WeChat: 6 yrs
TikTok: 2.5 yrs
9/ Why has the adoption accelerated?
Relative advantage, visibility, trialability, simplicity, and compatibility.
See image for explanation.
10/ Of course, churn rate is of paramount importance for any subscription business.
The median monthly churn rate across industries is 5.5%, with SaaS being lowest (4.6%) and SVOD being highest (10.8%).
Good to know MBI Deep Dives' churn is at par with SaaS.
11/ “A 5-percentage point increase in annual customer retention increased the CLVs for a number of industries by an average of 75%.
one percentage point improvement in retention added more to CLV than an equivalent improvement in acquisition cost and operating profit margin"
12/ If customer spending by cohort increases with time, you know things are in the right direction.
Here's an example of $CPNG.
13/ Given the importance of churn, NPS can be a good indicator of customer satisfaction/retention rate. Anything above 70 is excellent and 30-70 is very good.
CBCV can be particularly helpful in predicting revenue growth. Here’s how the bottom up model looks like.
14/ A common mistake is to assume constant retention rate in each cohort, but in reality retention rate in a particular cohort tends to increase with time. Assuming constant retention rate can lead to 25-50% undervaluation of a customer cohort.
15/A study found 20% customers generated 67% of revenues of a sample of 340 public companies.
Non-subscription businesses tend to be better at extracting value out of their “best” customers. Distribution of CLV, especially for non-subscription businesses is very lopsided.
16/ As mentioned earlier, CAC tends to rise with time as you move from early adopters to early majority unless, of course, you have network effects.
17/ One major difference between LTV/CAC and CBCV framework is unlike LTV/CAC, all costs are considered in CBCV. Since you don’t consider all costs and capex, LTV/CAC relies too much on heuristics.
18/ How companies add value
Two important concepts to consider here: Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Willingness to Sell (WTS)
19/ “companies should focus less on how to create more sales and more on how to delight their customers so as to increase WTP. This is important because the research suggests that higher consumer surplus leads to higher customer retention, hence linking directly to CLV”
20/ How do you increase WTP?
Here are three ways. (See images)
21/ How do you increase WTS?
Here are two ways (see images)
End/ Mauboussin and Callahan then provided an example (AT&T) to illustrate the CBCV framework.
another great interview of @danielgross and @natfriedman by @benthompson
Some notes from the interview:
on Japan:
"...We’ve been puzzled by why TSMC’s margins aren’t better for a little while. Why are they not taking more of the margin? And I think you just said it, they’ve been through so many rounds of boom and bust and they’ve outlived a lot of people who made the wrong moves."
...I find a really interesting mispriced thing in the world might be Japan, the entire country.
...if you’re trying to consolidate all your bets on semiconductors, Japan’s a pretty interesting geography, because I think they’re going to have all these components at the end of the day, in basically one single country.
...What I sort of wonder is in a world where, if AI really happens, maybe the 2030s are the decade of Japan, if they really are able to manufacture all of these components that have to get offshore from Taiwan for various reasons."
"Don't bet against Zuck"
On Gemini:
"...not only did they deliver a good model, but they delivered innovation along an axis, a couple orders of magnitude out from what anyone else had delivered so far
...it’s clear that Google has figured something out here, and they have a bit of a secret and we’ve all been looking for clues and poring over the literature to figure out what it is. But this is a real axis of differentiation."
Imagine opening Amazon’s earnings report 5 years from now and what do you think you might hope you paid more attention to? It’s very unlikely to be AWS topline growth rate this (or any) quarter.
If I have to guess, it’s the shipping+ fulfillment costs related developments that you would find more consequential 5 years from now.
I’ll explain why but let’s first take a look at some numbers quickly before going back to that discussion.
3P revenue grew by almost +20%, ads +25%, subscription mid-teen, and 1P MSD+.
AWS, which was the key focus for many, grew by ~12%. More on AWS later; let’s start more segment level discussion with Amazon, ex AWS.
Thread on $META follow-up call and some more thoughts on the quarter
Meta's DAU/MAU is at all-time high. Consumers vote with their time whereas "Intellectual Yet Idiot" class remains busy dissecting "surveillance capitalism"
chart h/t @east_cap
it seems the impact from the war so far has been minimal, and the wider 4Q revenue guide was likely just out of caution.
Meta had a terrific third quarter which makes the after-hours reaction (down ~3%) tad bit surprising, but perhaps understandable given the wider range of scenarios for advertising going forward.
Here are my highlights from tonight’s call.
Since 4Q’19, Meta added 880 Mn Daily Active Users/People (DAU/DAP) to its Family of Apps (FOA) properties.
Given Snap currently has 406 mn DAU, this means Meta added two “Snap” (and then some) in less than four years!!
DAU/MAU engagement looks steady across all regions. Overall DAU/MAU ratio has been inching up for the last seven consecutive quarters.
While Google Service segment did just fine, Google Cloud’s pace of deceleration in topline was a bit disappointing.
Here are my highlights from the call tonight.
After four consecutive quarters of single digit growth, Google returned to double digit growth this quarter.
Both Search and YouTube grew by double digit, but Google cloud’s topline growth came down from ~28% last quarter to 22.5% this quarter.
Google Services maintained mid-30s EBIT margin, but after posting QoQ margin expansion for the last 6 quarters, Google Cloud’s margin declined from 4.9% in 2Q’23 to 3.2% in 3Q’23.