Please take a moment before ripping the DOJ. This is not a wholesale appeal - it is tailored, see below.
As attorneys, we are trained from the beginning that attorney-client privilege is our most sacred trust. We should go to jail to protect it, we should NEVER violate that trust voluntarily.
The Court's decision was that there were portions of the memo that were after-the-fact cover for a decision already made, and that some was mere political advice -- those parts will be released.
But the Court also seems to have decided that some parts were legitimately part of the advice that the Office of Legal Counsel was giving to it's client - the Attorney General - and thus privileged. The DOJ should defend against the erosion of that privilege.
I share your hope, however, that the privileged portions of the memo are released because Fauk Bill Barr.
@MuellerSheWrote does an excellent (and much more detailed) job analyzing the specifics of the ruling here.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DirkSchwenk

25 May
Judge Jackson is about to lower the boom on the Rosenstein and O'Callaghan conspiracy to keep Trump from being prosecuted. Image
They spoon fed Barr their own choice: to ignore all DOJ policy and make an affirmative decision NOT to prosecute Trump. Image
These clips are from today's reporting in the Washington Post which you should read. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Read 14 tweets
17 May
Roe v Wade is DOA. Some brief thoughts, some of which you won't like, so count to 10 before flaming me, please.
It's tempting, but a terrible mistake, to say "men should sit down and shut up" on this issue. At least 40% of US women are "pro-life" news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pr…
Combatting the pro-life movement therefore requires a coalition of liberal men and women. Telling a significant part of a coalition that their opinions don't matter is a mistake.
Read 7 tweets
15 May
KOMPROMAT. Let us examine the evidence that the Trump phenomenon is really just long form kompromat. A thread. (A cooperative thread, I hope, since y'all should add the stuff I miss).
Eric Prince and Project Veritas were back in the news this week for hiring professionally attractive women to video tape trump enemies. These women included.
This isn't the first time that Trump allies have been closely identified with running honeypot operations. gizmodo.com/cambridge-anal…
Read 21 tweets
14 May
The NRA is not just a terrorist organization. Not just a front for pro-Russian anti-American interests. It is, at it's core, a giant ATM for one extremely douchie dude - Wayne Lapierre. A THREAD.
On May 11, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed the NRA's petition for bankruptcy. I haven't read it yet, so I'll tweet as I go. I do have a pre-existing concept of the NRA's massive grift, however.
If you want to read the decision yourself, it is embedded in this article: washingtonpost.com/context/federa…
Read 20 tweets
9 May
As an American, I have not spent a lot of time thinking about royalty. Our founders rebelled against it; wrote a lot about the negative aspects of Tyrants; and baked this into the Constitution: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States."
Despite that, I have often thought - looking at Canada, the UK, Australia, etc. - that perhaps a tamed royalty adds a nice flair and creates a sense of pride that we lack in the US. Queen Elizabeth seems a good person and she has done some good things.
That said, history is in the process of proving our founders right. The British Royal family is in bed with anti-democratic traitors and all the gilded carriages can't cover that up.
Read 12 tweets
5 May
I have just begun to dig into Judge Jackson's ruling re: the March 24, 2019 Memo on prosecuting Trump for obstruction. It looks very bad for Rod Rosenstein. I have always been ready to change opinions in light of evidence. This is evidence.
First, these are the most concerning facts re: Rod Rosenstein yet. The memo was partly authored by his deputy, and is signed off by him on it's way to Barr.
The Principal Associate Deputy AG Edward O'Callaghan that drafted this is a person you may recognize, and who I have long suggested people take a look at. I have always wondered why the Twitter hate machine did not even bother to ask who he was.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(