Late night action: The Biden administration will argue to keep most of a Trump-era Justice Department memo secret buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
DOJ filed notice late last night that it would partially defend the Trump admin's decision to keep a March 2019 memo secret that Bill Barr cited in clearing Trump of obstruction.
The case was briefed in the fall. This is first time DOJ under AG Garland weighed in, and lawyers said the judge had misunderstood the purpose of the memo and blamed "imprecision" in the govt's earlier briefs. The word "regret" appears five times. buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
This is a key thing at the heart of this case — pre-Trump and across administrations, DOJ generally has argued in favor of broader interpretations of what's exempt from FOIA and the govt's power to decide what records should be kept secret
Since there seems to be some confusion: The judge has ordered her full May 3 opinion unsealed, not the DOJ memo at issue. DOJ said last night they didn't oppose unredacting the judge's opinion now that they've released the first sections of the memo buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Judge Amy Berman Jackson gives CREW until Friday to weigh in on DOJ's request to pause disclosing the full OLC memo while the govt appeals. She throws some shade, noting DOJ's "late night filing" and that the govt's explanation has shifted ("states for the first time")
Here's CREW, the group that sued to get the OLC memo released: "In choosing to fight Judge Jackson's decision, the DOJ is taking a position that is legally and factually wrong and that undercuts efforts to move past the abuses of the last administration"
Here's Judge Amy Berman Jackson's unredacted opinion explaining her decision to order DOJ to release the March 2019 OLC memo re: Trump and obstruction. She says the memo's redactions and info provided by DOJ "deliberately obscured" the purpose of the memo assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2078…
More unredacted from Jackson: "So why did the Attorney General’s advisors, at his request, create a memorandum that evaluated the prosecutive merit of the facts amassed by the Special Counsel? Lifting the curtain reveals the answer to that too: getting a jump on public relations"
I'm reminded of way way back in Feb. 2019, when Jackson admonished Roger Stone to cool it with talking publicly about his case (this was before the full social media gag order): "This is a criminal proceeding and not a public relations campaign" buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A DC judge said today he’ll likely order the Trump admin's government efficiency office to preserve its records; no immediate ruling on whether DOGE is subject to FOIA buff.ly/mycbsPj
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
ICYMI: Trump announced a new policy requiring DOJ to demand in court that challengers suing the admin should have to post money bonds if they win orders blocking his actions. Several judges have already rejected such requests buff.ly/11JLZfZ
DC judge denied motion to restrict DOGE access at Treasury. NY judge's injunction remains in place for now.
DC judge said plaintiffs couldn't show irreparable harm re: personal data becoming public -- but they could come back if the situation changed assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Overnight: Washington state AG filed a contempt motion accusing the Trump administration of defying an injunction that blocked cutting off federal funds to institutions that provide gender-affirming care in the states that sued assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
We've got ourselves an old fashioned Friday news dump. What's happened over the past few hours:
- SCOTUS declined, for now, to let Trump oust the head of a federal whistleblower protection agency, letting the official stay in the job until at least Wednesday. From Greg Stohr: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
- DOJ took the unusual step of confirming that it had filed a misconduct complaint against a DC fed judge over her handling of recent hearings in litigation over Trump's effort to bar trans troops from serving in the US military. With Erik Larson: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
A Mass. federal judge set a hearing for tomorrow on whether to immediately halt the Elon Musk-affiliated "Fork in the Road" deferred resignation offer for federal workers from the Trump admin. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a DC federal judge is holding a hearing now on whether to intervene re: Treasury Dept. giving info to Musk's DOGE team. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Some more court action later in the day:
- Re: Trump's bar on transgender troops, judge isn't ruling on the motion for an immediate TRO after US basically said status quo will remain pending a fight over a longer-term prelim injunction, but judge says govt must immediately alert her + plaintiffs if that'll change
- DC federal judge set a Friday hearing to consider whether to grant a TRO blocking DOGE from getting access to Dept. of Labor systems and information. See earlier from @swillmer: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Interesting hearing this evening in Missouri’s lawsuit seeking to block DOJ from sending two election observers to monitor a St. Louis polling site on Election Day. No ruling from the bench (recap below)
Complaint: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
DOJ oppo: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Missouri argues state law spells out who can enter a polling place to observe and DOJ monitors aren’t covered. DOJ says there’s a 2021 settlement with the St. Louis board of elections for ADA violations re: disability access that allows this
But Missouri AG says it appeared it was news to state officials that this agreement was in effect, and more broadly, that the board lacked authority to enter into the monitoring term in the first place. Which raises some Qs for the judge...
Hello on this stunning September morning from the DC federal courthouse, where Judge Tanya Chutkan is holding the first hearing in the Trump case since SCOTUS kicked it back to her. Trump won't be here. Waiting to see what kind of schedule Chutkan will set for the next round of fights over the future of the indictment bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Trump's lawyers all just entered the courtroom, and also thrilled to report that courthouse security dog Legend is here and continues to be a Very Good Dog (no pics allowed I'm afraid)