Identity politics, whether you like it or not, is the future.

Fighting against it will be as futile as trying to reverse the direction of ocean tides.

It's peaking now, but will ebb slightly, and then return like a tsunami once whites become a majority minority around 2045.
The key is not to fight the inevitable, but to harness the power of your group to keep it from being inundated. It's going to be ugly and brutal.
The pill is black, but if you refuse to take it, you won't survive.
Often multicultural societies survive because the groups within them begin intermarrying in sufficient numbers that the bright lines between them become dim and harder to recognize.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with A New Radical Centrism

A New Radical Centrism Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @a_centrism

23 May
Which era of film had the most memorable actors and actresses with the most star power and screen presence?

(See next few tweets for sample listings of prominent actors from each era.)
1930-1960: Cary Grant, Humphrey Bogart, Katherine Hepburn, John Wayne, Marilyn Monroe, Clark Gable, Bette Davis, James Stewart, Greta Garbo, Ingrid Bergman, Spencer Tracy, Lana Turner, Robert Mitchum, Henry Fonda...
1960-1990: Robert De Niro, Meryl Streep, Paul Newman, Sophia Loren, Robert Redford, Dustin Hoffman, Diane Keaton, Al Pacino, Sidney Poitier, Clint Eastwood, Steve McQueen, Jack Nicholson, Harrison Ford...
Read 7 tweets
22 May
Serious question: In all the hate crime video clips that have emerged over the last few weeks, have any shown a perpetrator who wasn't either a person of color or leftwing?
By "person of color" let's use the standard leftwing definition, which would include Arabs.
Personally, I think calling a Palestinian Arab a "person color" is dumb, but I'll indulge the left's definitions this time.
Read 4 tweets
21 May
1/ Republicans have apparently been instructed to publicly refer to all incidents of CRT-influenced weirdness as "Marxism," even though this is rarely accurate. It's every bit as laughable and transparent as Democrats referring to stuff they don't like as "white supremacy."
2/ The fact that some CRT ideas draw from Critical Theory ("Frankfurt School"), which was a neo-Marxist approach to society and culture, doesn't make CRT "Marxism."
3/ The route looks like this:

Marxism (economics and politics) ---> Critical Theory (neo-Marxist approach to society and culture) ---> Critical Race Theory (racialized variant of Critical Theory)
Read 7 tweets
21 May

1/ In Portland area schools, a room filled with teachers was divided up "into oppressed and oppressors... to intimidate white teachers into submission through collective guilt and fear of being labeled a racist."…
2/ There are "weekly antiracism sessions in which white teachers are expected to remain silent, 'honor the feelings of... black, indigenous, and people of color."
3/ "[M]inority teachers were allowed 90 seconds to berate their white colleagues... [a Hispanic teacher] denounced one of her white female colleagues... [later she] boasted on Facebook that she had publicly humiliated a racist, despite providing no evidence of racism."
Read 4 tweets
7 May
And I'm tired of being the only anti-Woke account (who isn't Cathy Young or Claire Lehmann) with more than 20,000 followers who seems to be publicly objecting to this. Is this kind of ridiculous framing going to become the new norm?
I get DMs from notable IDWers who are frustrated by his rhetoric but so far seem unwilling to publicly criticize it. I understand the need to work together to fight an enemy, but tweets like this provide fodder for the woketariat to use to try to dismiss us all as hysterics.
Read 4 tweets
6 May
My most unpopular opinion:

NIMBYism is good.

Zoning to protect single-family residential housing is even better.

Not everybody gets to live where they want.

And don't pretend that introducing density into fragile historical neighborhoods won't destroy the soul of cities.
So where will all the baristas who want to live in or near desirable neighborhoods live?

Where people with low-paying crappy jobs have always lived: In unappealing neighborhoods located nowhere near appealing neighborhoods.
Trying to engineer something different than this will reduce urban life to the kind of monochromatic and soulless wash of well-intended "inclusion" that looks like dystopia to me.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!