1/ Dental office #COVIDCO2. The perfectly operable window is closed. 🤦♂️ THREAD...
2/ At the end of my visit, in a 144 sqft room with 9' ceilings, the hygienist and myself, it reached 1500 ppm. Overall rebreathed fraction of air from others reached 2.8%. The door to the operatory was open 1 inch.
3/ I believe this is the outdoor air intake for the whole building. Located behind two air conditioner outdoor units.
4/ Other notes: There is a 99 CFM CADR air cleaner in the operatory. It was running on low speed. After discussing with hygienist, she turned it to full speed. This provides 4.5 ACH of equivalent ventilation for aerosol removal.
5/ Hygienist was contact + droplet protection. Double-masking surgical masks. No N95s unless AGP, as per Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario.
This is guidance still as of MAY 2021.
THERE ARE AMPLE SUPPLIES! @BarryHunt008
*BREATHING* IS AN AEROSOL GENERATING ACTIVITY!
6/ I mentioned I can wear my (vertical-fold style) N95 all day without any issue, it's more comfortable than the earloops-style surgical masks.
Hygienist said her N95 (rigid cup style) has to be pulled really tight against her face to get a passing fit.
7/ @rcdso_org, how do you reconcile "put safety first", "prioritize caution and safety" while also placing inventory of PPE of high importance?
8/ @rcdso_org, you had an opportunity to improve protection from respiratory aerosols in line with Health Canada & CDC documentation, and CSA Z94.4-18. But last week (May 19 2021) all you did was add gowns. Gowns.
9/ No change from 6 months ago. I sent the appropriate information by email, tried following up.
🦗🦗🦗
Front line staff are very interested though. As one would be when "working inside a sneeze all day" as @dentalhygieneq1 says.
Vancouver Coastal Health has released an updated Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality resource for Schools and Childcare Facilities () but their CO2 page needs some edits. vch.ca/en/document-li…
Vancouver Coastal Health "CO2 concentrations do not indicate a risk of infectious disease transmission in a space". No.
ASHRAE's position document on indoor CO2 says "higher CO2 conc correspond to lower ventilation and potentially increased risk of airborne transmission"
Vancouver Coastal Health "Note that health effects from CO2 occur at levels above 5000 ppm". Did WorkSafeBC interfere? Because that's contradicted by your Health Canada reference in the sentence immediately before it.
This document has been a long time coming. As described by @jljcolorado, Lidia Morawska, co-chair of the group that published the new WHO airborne model, was previously cut off by John Conly when making the case that #COVIDisAirborne to WHO. /3
Air purifier manufacturers say HEPA should always be the filter of choice, and their product's proprietary filter delivers. Which HEPA? ISO 35H at 99.95% or ISO 40H at 99.99%? Why not ISO 50U? That's 10x better at 99.999%. Why stop there? Go for ISO 70U at 99.99999%! /1
The answer is, single-pass filtration efficiency DOESN'T MATTER except in specific cases like Powered Air Purifying Respirators (PAPR), clean rooms, operating theaters, or nuclear laboratory exhaust—HEPA's original purpose. /2
For portable/in-room air cleaners, all that matters is the Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) for a target particle size and type, within acceptable for sound power and frequency characteristics for the people in the room. /3
Four years into this and we can't keep duct-taping in-room filter solutions for clean air. It's just filter(s) and a fan. We need open-source, optimized design, certifiable product, efficient, repairable using commodity filters and commodity components. /1
We need air cleaners assembled and distributed by not-for-profit community-based social enterprise. No more lock-in to proprietary filters. Verified replacement commodity filtration performance for safety. /2
Low income with donated CR boxes will pay over time in electrical costs for the duct-taped solution for clean air.
Power utilization for Smoke CADR, same filters:
Conventional CR Box: 4 CADR/W. (77 W)
PC fan array air cleaner: 24 CADR/W. (8 W)
/3
1/ Levoit Core 400S versus Austin Air HM400 in a challenge to see which portable air cleaner removes submicron salt particle aerosols the fastest! Which do you think will win, and by how much? Poll in next tweet below...
2/ Which has a higher CADR (Clean Air Delivery Rate):
Levoit Core 400S, or Austin Air HM400?
See if you can find the manufacturer's claims for both, and then come back and vote:
[sarcasm] Not only is the Austin Air bigger and far heavier, it also draws way more power, is much louder, and more expensive. It couldn't possibly be *worse* than the Levoit, right? Right?