1/ A thread with some tips on writing qualitative research dissertations - esp those using thematic analysis - including common problems to avoid (prompted by marking student projects). First tip - as @ginnybraun & I always say check local requirements! Broadly speaking, there
2/ are two styles of qual research reporting: 1) "add qual and stir" - default quant conventions slightly tweaked for qual: finding & filling the "gap" introduction & rationale, methodological critique of existing studies, separate "results" & discussion... 2) qual centric. The
3/ latter is far less well understood & recognised - I've had reviewers/editors insist on me reworking qual centric reports into something more conventional, examiners do the same to my students. So check what is required in your context. If a marker/examiner doesn't "get it"
4/ they may not like it! So for qual centric reporting if you're not positivist/realist in your research what does that mean for your introduction? Don't be a positivist/realist in the intro! Think carefully about framing & footing of quanty research - don't present quanty
5/ "findings" as facts but as claims. Don't engage in methodological critique based on quanty assumptions (odd!). Understand your intro as contextualisation & rationale for your study rather than simply a lit review & finding a "gap". Don't describe single study after study...
6/ try to overview & synthesise if discussing a body of lit. The best intros in my view make an argument for the research & frame it within relevant wider contexts, they flow beautifully - I always know why I'm being told something & where things are going. There's no jumping
7/ around to seemingly unrelated topics... Work out if your intro is the classic inverted triangle - start broader get more specific - or what I call "stacking boxes" - you have several different topics to discuss that aren't easily classified as broader/more specific - they
8/ are all roughly the same - so how do you order/stack the boxes? It's a judgement call - see what works best as you write. Definitely have signposting/an overview at the start to help the reader understand where things are going. Try to have linking sentences between topics/
9/ sections to signal transitions. We've been there now we're going here... End the intro with your research questions/aims. These should make sense/not be a surprise given the context you have presented. The reader should almost expect your research questions! Don't present
8/ hypotheses or discuss as a student was asked to recently what you expect to find! Don't formulate your research question in terms of the impact of X on Y - this is essentially quanty hypotheses in a bad disguise! You need a qual specific formulated question. Check out my and
11/ @ginnybraun's qual textbook for advice on qual specific research questions - uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/succ…
12/ This paper has guidance on research questions specific to thematic analysis - uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7164974…
13/ Check your dissertation title to make sure it isn't implicitly quanty framed too. I can't tell you how many times I've got to the research questions expecting a quant study! There's been nothing in the title or intro to lead me to expect a qual study! In the method/ology make
14/ make sure you discuss your philosophical assumptions even if only briefly & esp. if using TA as it's a theoretically flexible method(ish) not a theoretically bound methodology. If you're an insider researcher (a member of the grp you are researching) Take a dive into the
15/ insider researcher lit - this paper by @drnikkihayfield & Caroline Huxley is a great place to start: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
16/ In general look for methodological lit related to your design choices. Don't say I had to do video call ints because of Covid... draw on the video call methodological lit to provide a more robust rationale & discussion. Great chapter by @phannadr - cambridge.org/core/books/col…
17/ I often encounter students being told to cite more than 1 source on thematic analysis - peril!! Most aren't aware of the diversity in TA - don't mix & match incompatible approaches. Braun & Clarke and Boyatzis = NOPE! B&C and Joffe/Barbour/Guest = also NOPE! Check out the
18/ Conceptual & Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis paper linked to earlier for guidance. Do you have to explain why you didn't use other method/ologies to explain your choice of analytic method? Some like this but I think it's odd... I've seen utterly implausible alternatives
19/ presented & very poorly explained! Check out this paper to help you develop a robust rationale for your selected method/ology (free to read at the moment) - onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.10…
20/ If you used B&C TA don't just provide a generic description of the 6 phases - tell the reader what you actually did, how you engaged with the process! Avoid quanty style headings in the method/ology (Materials? Nope) & generally rationale (why) before procedure (how). In the
21/ Analysis (not Findings if you can avoid this discovery oriented heading) start with an overview (simple list of themes, a table or thematic map) - I'm often befuddled as to what/where the themes are! Don't confuse topic summaries with themes if doing B&C TA - see Conceptual
22/ and Design Thinking... paper linked to earlier for a discussion. Avoid one word theme names as they aren't very informative (& suggest topic summaries) & keep in mind that themes are complex, rich & multifaceted stories - you can't report loads of them & do them justice.
23/ We generally advise against loads of theme levels & subthemes - the latter are useful to highlight a facet of the central concept. If you want lots of themes/theme levels try template or framework analysis as these are designed for this. In qual centric an integrated "results
24/ & discussion" is all good but this seems to be something that more mainstream/positivist folks really struggle with... In a dissertation with an integrated R&D you still need a general discussion where you reflect on the study & look forward to future research. Things to
25/ avoid here - noting you *may* have influenced the analysis because of your positioning. Take it from me - you did! Try to reflect on *how* you did. Don't bemoan the lack of generalisability of your small sample - gaaaahhhh! You're evaluating qual here using quant standards
26/ And you're implicitly invoking a quant conceptualisation of statistical generalisability. There are qually forms - discuss these instead! Check out this fantastic paper by @BrettSmithProf - tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
27/ When you make suggestions for future research don't turn on the "random ideas generator"!! The suggestions should arise from your research - intriguing "findings" that need to be explored further, addressing the limitations of your study. If suggesting research needs to be
28/ conducted with other groups of people - try to provide an evidenced based discussion explaining why things might be different (and similar) for these groups as we do in this open access paper on gay fathers: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Victoria Clarke 🦄

Victoria Clarke 🦄 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvicclarke

1 Jun
1/ A thread on why I think collecting demographic data is important in qualitative research (& research more broadly) & a request for your thoughts on this. Am I alone in thinking this is important? I seem to be... based on experiences of ethics scrutiny this yr #AcademicChatter
2/ I get the sense that some researchers - esp those researching students - implicitly imagine their potential participants as the "usual suspects" (white, straight, nondisabled, middle class etc)... I've scrutinised several studies where disability (cog fog etc) would confound
3/ the quant results but no exclusion criteria & no demographics - I don't get it?! I've been told by white male students more than once that if for eg race/ethnicity aren't relevant to the research question there is no need to collect demog data on ethnicity. But as a white
Read 17 tweets
28 May
1/ To all those advocating saturation as *the* criterion for determining qual "sample" size (instead of Gender & Society's positivist qual 35 int minimum) please note that saturation has been critiqued for bloody decades as realist/positivist & not working for all qual. Here's
2/ Ian Dey in 1999 - yep over 20 years ago! - describing saturation as an "unfortunate metaphor": books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/gr…
3/ Here's me & @ginnybraun critiquing the use of saturation as information redundancy in thematic analysis research - arguing that saturation only makes sense in positivist/realist forms of TA. For our reflexive approach it simply doesn't work: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 8 tweets
15 May
1/ A thread providing an overview of my & @ginnybraun's latest paper on #thematicanalysis - Conceptual & Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis in the APA journal Qualitative Psychology - I will link to an open access version at the end of the thread: psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-45…
2/ Why this paper? Because TA is closer to a method (trans theoretical technique) rather than a methodology (theoretically informed & delimited framework for research) researchers need to engage in careful conceptual & design thinking to produce coherent research.
3/ What Levitt et al. (2017) call research with "methodological integrity". Some argue TA is actually a challenging option because it necessitates conceptual & design thinking - we like to see this more positively as TA making visible the thinking necessary for quality research.
Read 16 tweets
4 Apr
1/ A thread on qual interviewing. I've been talking to students this week about to embark on their first interview so I thought I would share my tips here for anyone about to do the same! Feeling nervous/anxious about doing your first interview is normal! I am very shy/socially
2/ anxious & I take comfort in the fact an interview is a structured social encounter - you have a role to play, so does the interviewee. You will hit your stride - for most around interview 3/4. A practice run with a friend or family member can really help boost your confidence!
3/ If you have the opportunity to watch a research interview take it! There's no better way to learn. My PhD supervisors also encouraged their students to participate in research & that was so helpful to get a feel for an interview from the "inside". There are loads of different
Read 26 tweets
4 Apr
Following my tweet yesterday on the new edition of Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology - if you're not familiar with this book here's why it's awesome - it covers 5 qual approaches - TA, IPA, grounded theory, discourse & narrative analysis. For each there is a "how to" guide
written by "experts" (e.g. me & @ginnybraun for TA, @BrettSmithProf for narrative analysis), then a doing chapter often written by a grad student/ECR applying the approach to an interview dataset - which is reproduced in the book, with further interviews on the companion website
So for the doing TA chapter @GarethRTerry shares his experience of using TA to analyse 2 interviews with ex-soldiers about their experiences of leaving the army. He starts with answering the 'many questions' of TA & reflecting on his assumptions before diving into the six phases.
Read 6 tweets
20 Aug 20
1/ Following the recent publication of a paper on online qualitative surveys with @ginnybraun @lgoatley @Elicia_Boulton & Charlotte McEvoy here's a thread of resources for qually survey research. Starting with that paper which is currently open access: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
2/ And an accompanying blog about why qually surveys are awesome: ijsrm.org/2020/08/19/onl…
3/ @ginnybraun & I first wrote about qually surveys in our textbook Successful Qualitative Research - the companion website includes egs of surveys and survey datasets for use in teaching: uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/succ…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(