What Durham is doing is one of the great mysteries of the Barr era. I still think there's an above-zero chance he finds the opposite of Trumpists want, but I am less confident now that we know RR and O'Callaghan were turned. $1.5M is not a lot of money, really.
If you wanna don the Rose Coloreds ... we now know that Rosenstein and O'Callaghan ventured right up to the edge (and maybe beyond) of obstruction as Barr came aboard as AG. Durham is authorized to prosecute any crimes related to the Mueller investigation.
And we know that O'Callaghan was in the NATSEC division up until RR elevated him to supervise the Russia investigation. Durham is empowered to investigate "intelligence, counter-intelligence or law enforcement activities." justice.gov/file/1370931/d…
We know that SOMEHOW there was no prosecution of anyone despite the fact that the USGOV has now acknowledged that Manafort was sharing polling data with Russian intelligence and Russia was using that information in the 2016 election.
And we know that AG Garland has taken no public action related to Durham, including formally notifying Congress of the scope of the appointment, despite the fact that he is now in charge of Durham.
All that said, my first guess is that Durham is up to no good, but just can't find much to make trouble with. If he prosecutes some of the Trumpist/Russian moles in the DOJ though, I'm OK with that.
As attorneys, we are trained from the beginning that attorney-client privilege is our most sacred trust. We should go to jail to protect it, we should NEVER violate that trust voluntarily.
The Court's decision was that there were portions of the memo that were after-the-fact cover for a decision already made, and that some was mere political advice -- those parts will be released.
It's tempting, but a terrible mistake, to say "men should sit down and shut up" on this issue. At least 40% of US women are "pro-life" news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pr…
Combatting the pro-life movement therefore requires a coalition of liberal men and women. Telling a significant part of a coalition that their opinions don't matter is a mistake.
KOMPROMAT. Let us examine the evidence that the Trump phenomenon is really just long form kompromat. A thread. (A cooperative thread, I hope, since y'all should add the stuff I miss).
Eric Prince and Project Veritas were back in the news this week for hiring professionally attractive women to video tape trump enemies. These women included.
This isn't the first time that Trump allies have been closely identified with running honeypot operations. gizmodo.com/cambridge-anal…
The NRA is not just a terrorist organization. Not just a front for pro-Russian anti-American interests. It is, at it's core, a giant ATM for one extremely douchie dude - Wayne Lapierre. A THREAD.
On May 11, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed the NRA's petition for bankruptcy. I haven't read it yet, so I'll tweet as I go. I do have a pre-existing concept of the NRA's massive grift, however.
As an American, I have not spent a lot of time thinking about royalty. Our founders rebelled against it; wrote a lot about the negative aspects of Tyrants; and baked this into the Constitution: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States."
Despite that, I have often thought - looking at Canada, the UK, Australia, etc. - that perhaps a tamed royalty adds a nice flair and creates a sense of pride that we lack in the US. Queen Elizabeth seems a good person and she has done some good things.
That said, history is in the process of proving our founders right. The British Royal family is in bed with anti-democratic traitors and all the gilded carriages can't cover that up.