Honestly, this is a remarkable demonstration of the strawman fallacy. Kudos to @sullydish for giving us such a clear antithesis of basic rhetorical etiquette.
Here we get the claim that “critical theory” rejects fallibilism, objectivity, accountability, and pluralism. None of this is true.
Then Sullivan claims that because “critical theory defines itself” as questioning certain things, it’s aiming to destroy liberal modernity.
There are so many mistakes in this paragraph I don’t even know where to start. From the third sentence on, almost every claim is false.
For the love of God, Andrew; apply some of that Enlightenment rational thinking and show us some fucking EVIDENCE for these preposterous claims, would you? It’s too bad there isn’t any...
Oh good, here comes Andy to rescue us from our concern that he has sketched a strawman. Prove us wrong, please!!!
His rebuttal to this objection: “I honestly don’t think so. Rather, my depiction is accurate.”
Man’s never heard of a burden of proof in his fucking life, has he?
Here Sullivan gets closest to an accurate description of CRT — only to claim that this is “what CRT is not.” Compare it to Charles Mills on what CRT is. If only Sullivan relied on serious scholarly sources on CRT, he’d realize he should be “among its strongest defenders.”
I am pretty sure the 1619 Project did NOT insist that “white supremacy” was the *definition* of the US. If that were the case, there would be no point trying to educate the next generation about our racist history in hopes that they might be able to overthrow US white supremacy.
I just... what the fuck? Huh? WAt?!?!?
Hey Andrew, I agree with this! Surely then you will support a robust program of employment rights? Or have you not thought out this contradiction between your opposition to cancel culture and commitment to right-wing economic policies like at-will employment?
I walk away from this article knowing one thing: Andrew Sullivan is less of a liberal than CRT heavyweight Charles Mills. And he hasn’t got a fucking clue what CRT is. (Okay, so two things then.)
[FIN]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a thread on the 2022 right-wing documentary UNCLE TOM II, a film based entirely on the worldview and source material of the John Birch Society.
It has been promoted by Charlie Kirk & Jack Posobiec as proof that MLK & the civil rights movement were secretly Communist. 🧵
1. Leading up to MLK Day this year, Kirk & Posobiec decided they were going to abandon the standard Republican ritual (quoting King out of context, depicting the civil rights hero as a colorblind conservative).
Instead, they wanted to vilify MLK and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
2. On the eve of MLK Day, Posobiec was promoting UNCLE TOM II and its narrator Chad O. Jackson as authoritative sources on King's connections to "Communists."
Kirk had already promoted UNCLE TOM II on Real America's Voice in 2022 after the film was released.
Because everyone is talking about Ibram Kendi: it is so deeply upsetting to me that when reading groups and book lists were popping up after George Floyd was murdered it was always the work of people like Kendi & DiAngelo. Imagine if everybody read Charles Mills instead 🥲
Robin DiAngelo made a shit ton of money telling other white people that white people are basically incurably racist and Ibram Kendi made a shit ton of money basically claiming to be the sole arbiter of what racism truly is and refused to acknowledge any critiques of his views
I get a bit more detailed with my critiques here, but I ultimately do have a lot more to say, been wanting to write something about this and maybe I will soon (if any media sites/mags are interested, DM me!)
Chris Rufo took a break from suing college students for "political violence" (read: getting spit on his shoes) to argue that conservatives should turn to Nixon "as our guide" in mobilizing a "counterrevolution" against things like CRT and DEI.
A quick thread on Nixon & Rufo 🧵
It is interesting that Rufo venerates Nixon, because Rufo likes to talk about how he is deeply opposed to racism, often pointing to the fact that he is in an interracial marriage and has biracial children.
Nixon was deeply racist. Ex 1: Nixon & Reagan discuss African diplomats
Being charitable, you might think that the Reagan phone call is not enough to call Nixon racist.
Ex 2: Nixon explains that, while he is against abortion in some cases, he thinks it is necessary to prevent the birth of interracial ("a black and a white") children.
The YouTube channel for Larry Elder’s documentary films uploaded the John Birch Society propaganda film ANARCHY USA, which claims the civil rights movement “is simply part of a worldwide movement, organized and directed by Communists, to enslave all mankind”
A thread, w/ clips🧵
ANARCHY USA was written & directed in 1966 by JBS member G. Edward Griffin, a prolific propagandist & first-rate quack. Griffin believes that HIV “doesn’t even exist” & that cancer is a dietary deficiency that can be cured with “an essential food compound” mediamatters.org/glenn-beck/who…
This upload of ANARCHY USA has become one of the most popular videos on the Uncle Tom YouTube channel. It has been viewed over 200k times in just eight months, whereas the film has been viewed fewer than 40k times in seven years on the official John Birch Society YouTube channel.
"Cultural Marxism" has entered mainstream political discourse, appearing in recent speeches by DeSantis and Hawley, Fox News broadcasts, and right-wing media from Breitbart to Ben Shapiro.
This is a thread, with clips, on the 25-year history of "Cultural Marxism" on the Right 🧵
1. We begin with the arch-conservative activist and TV host, Bill Lind.
He began his 1998 talk "The Origins of Political Correctness" by saying college campuses have become so authoritarian that he'd be put "literally on trial" for joking about women and shopping carts
2. Lind says political correctness is seen as something to laugh at, but in fact "it's deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead... the disease of ideology."