(this might be useful if you are a product manager, product leader, or founder)
Before we jump in:
Frameworks will not fix all your problems.
Used right, they should help you 1) better understand your context 2) create structure for problems 3) communicate ideas & solutions
I often use these frameworks in my product work, sometimes without realizing it.
1/ 3X framework (Kent Beck)
A product can be in one of 3 stages 1. Explore 2. Expand 3. Extract
For product leaders this is the most vital framework to understand because almost every important decision should account for the stage your product is in.
Examples of decisions you can make more rigorously with the 3X framework:
- optimize for inputs, outputs, or outcomes?
- set more qualitative or quantitative goals?
- how to measure progress?
- what skills to look for?
- how to evaluate PMs' impact?
1) Who is the customer? 2) What is the problem/opportunity? 3) What is the main customer benefit? 4) How do you know customers want this? 5) What is the customer experience?
This framework provides useful structure for product proposals, reviews, etc.
A practical way to think & talk about tension in interface design. In your UI, what features must be obvious, what features should be easy to find, and what features should be possible to discover?
A B2B/SaaS product framework to elicit what problems truly matter for your customers. It isn't enough that your product solves a problem for the customer. You need to understand where that problem ranks.
4: We have an articulated strategy but execution is disconnected
5: We are cohesively executing on a known & rigorous strategy
13/ Jobs To Be Done (Christensen et al)
To innovate, you need to understand what jobs your customers are hiring your product for. Look beyond the obvious utility of your product. I like how JTBD emphasizes customer psychology & creative execution.
When communicating about your product (e.g. on your website, blog post, pdf case study, product video), make it easy for customers to get an answer these questions
1) What does it do? 2) Is it for me? 3) How good is it? 4) Should I act now?
15/ Team diagnosis framework
Are we defining the product right?
Are we defining right, but not building it fast?
Are we defining right, building fast, but not at desired quality?
Are we defining right, building fast, at desired quality, but not with expected business impact?
16/ The 3 levels of product work
1. The Execution level
2. The Impact level
3. The Optics level
Very important, esp. for product leaders to be intentional about the level at which they (and others) need to operate in a given context.
19/ Agreed Target Quality Framework (h/t Jeff Seibert)
Very effective for proactively & rigorously addressing Eng/Design/PM conflict when building a product.
Instead of litigating 100s of details just before launch, discuss upfront the quality level you are aiming for (and why)
20/ Delegation Framework (h/t Keith Rabois)
This framework is especially useful for senior product managers & leaders to create clarity on the decisions team members can make on their own and the decisions you’d like to make with them.
This framework improved the quality of my life as a PM & my work more than anything else I've encountered.
The main insight is that all your tasks are not created equal. There are 3 types of PM tasks:
1) Leverage 2) Neutral 3) Overhead
Before taking on a task, identify what type of task it is. Take more time than you would for Leverage tasks, and create the time to do that by taking less time for Neutral & Overhead tasks.
To make a major impact with your products, accelerate your career, get the opportunity to lead other PMs & create tremendous career optionality, aim to become a 10-30-50 PM: top 10% in one of the senses, top 30% in another one, and top 50% in the third.
Product leaders should give level-specific guidance on:
Skills–to build/enhance
Mindset–to be more effective e.g. high agency
Activities–to improve product/team
Results–expected Outputs+Outcomes
Training–resources to achieve all this
27/ Types of Product Managers (Sachin Rekhi)
1) Builders 2) Tuners 3) Innovators
As a hiring manager, create clarity (for yourself first & then for candidates) on what primary type (or primary hat, if you wish) is best suited for a given role
1) The Operator 2) The Craftsperson 3) The Visionary
It is important for you as a startup founder/CEO, PM or product leader to deeply understand these types/hats as you make decisions on whom to hire or whom to work for
This is a practical Diverge-Converge framework that's useful for ambiguous product discovery. Likely the most salient part here is the vocabulary to help get stakeholders on the same page & avoid rushing the discovery process.
A vital product strategy lesson that many PMs miss: your customer segmentation should be tailored to your product & its category. Generic axes (e.g. SMB vs enterprise) are usually not super-useful.
None of these is the "right" stage, it all depends on the specifics of the company & its challenges. But avoid reaching Stage 3 too early, it's not fun.
Some PMs actively seek highly "PM-Driven" companies i.e. Stage 3, not realizing that product work at such companies is either not actually fun or the products produced are mediocre at best. More here:
Most people implicitly use ROI as a metric when picking the tasks they will do. When in a high leverage role (e.g. product leadership), consider shifting to an Opportunity Cost mindset.
Start with the lower domains. Then, to differentiate yourself from the crowd and make a singular impact in your work as a senior leader, pay attention to the higher levels. Seek learning opportunities for each domain.
38/ The Insight–Execution–Impact framework for evaluating PM performance in a way that's concrete, actionable, and aligns better with company goals (also includes a template to re-use):
39/ The 4 Types of Data Cultures
- Data Agnostic
- Thesis Driven
- Metrics Driven
- Data Informed
Your product team’s emphasis on (a) Quantitative inputs & outcomes and its openness to (b) Qualitative inputs & outcomes will strongly shape its culture
Decide where you want to be
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some ppl are surprised by the exuberance with which PG’s Founder Mode blog post has been received. There are many reasons for its strong resonance.
But the main one is that it introduces a catchy term for something that many founders & leaders have seen & experienced first-hand.
Here’s my prediction: a majority of founders & leaders who said to themselves this weekend “henceforth I am going to be in Founder Mode” are likely to mess it up.
That is not bad per se. They might still end up being in a better place than if they continued with Manager Mode.
Product life in midsized & large companies starts making a lot more sense when you understand that a large % of middle & upper management thinks their main job is to (i) try & decipher what the CEO wants done (ii) align their org with it (iii) propose a plan that the CEO approves
This is instead of *often* telling the CEO what actually needs to be done, in a way that is grounded in (a) deep insight into customers & market (b) creative product & GTM solutions
Many in middle & upper management will of course blame incentives set by the company for this.
And they are not wrong. But it is worth evaluating how much of one’s career (and life) one wants to spend in aligning perfectly with incentives set by another party.
Everything we create, everything we do, it all starts with our thinking
Clear thinking drastically improves odds of success in all departments of career & life
While clear thinking is quite rare, it can be developed with practice
Advanced principles for clear thinking:
(1/12)
1) Essence first. Not story. Not analogy
Most people get seduced by great analogies & exciting stories.
Clear thinkers don’t *form* their thinking via analogies. They identify the essence of the issue, in their specific context. Then, they use analogies as one of their inputs.
2) WAYRTTD
“What Are You _Really_ Trying To Do” is a simple but powerful tool to make you pause & identify your real goal
Most people move too quickly to How & When to do a given task. But the task isn’t the goal
Clear thinkers have built a habit of asking themselves WAYRTTD.
Apple Pie Position:
A statement that instantly elevates the person who is saying it and is simultaneously hard for anyone else to push back on, and so everyone avoids the personal risk and just nods “yes”, even though its actual value in this specific situation might be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Okay, so now that you understand Apple Pie, here’s your crash course on dealing with Apple Pie:
1) The greatest thing about Apple Pie Positions is that you now have a name to assign to a complex behavior (and it is a cute name, which helps a lot). Once you share this idea with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
One other important thing:
Note that Apple Pie Positions are, by definition, specific to the context. This means that the same sentence can be either the right thing to focus on, or it can be an Apple Pie Position. The way you determine which is which is through good judgment.