Pinboard Profile picture
May 30, 2021 16 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Because Bitcoin especially (through the Tether fraud) and cryptocurrency more generally is a pyramid scheme, of course Wall Street and venture capital need it to go mass market. It's the only road to getting out of their current investment at a profit politico.com/news/2021/05/3…
I think it's time for us in the tech world to speak out and make it clear the emperor has no clothes here. Cryptocurrency is sustained by a mix of money laundering, vaporware, fraud, ransomware, gambling, and delusion. It has no social benefit except helping end first dates fast
What we especially need to stress to regulators is that there's no relationship between the technical claims of cryptocurrency and our now over 13 years of experience. It's not decentralized, it's not a currency, it's not a store of value, and it's not a promising technology
Cryptocurrency solves no problems that it didn't first create, and most of those it doesn't solve. Smart contracts are neither of those things—at worst they're an API for fraud, or as @qrs put it, self-funding bug bounties at best
I think most of us in the industry gave cryptocurrency a long leash because it's full of technical cleverness and seemed innovative just on those terms. But it's time we recognize that cleverness is being used as bait to defraud more people and perpetuate a con. Enough is enough Image
The two things people need to know about cryptocurrency are completely non-technical:

1. If it doesn't work, it's just an easy to lose casino chip
2. If it works, it creates an end run around all financial regulation, and will be dominated by uses those regulations try to stop
Some of those financial regulations are unjust. People can send remittances in crypto to relatives in repressive countries, and you hear their stories from boosters. But people also want to move billions in untraceable crime money around. Guess which traffic predominates
The third path out of this dilemma is to legitimize cryptocurrency by bringing it into our existing regulatory structures, at which point it becomes indistinguishable from technologies that do the same thing at a fraction of the complexity and one millionth of the resource cost.
The only reason proponents have to domesticate cryptocurrency is to maintain a situation like the status quo, where part of it (like Coinbase) sits in the legal economy, the rest of remains in the illegal economy, and pathways between the two continue to function smoothly.
Remember the playbook that Uber used:

1. Promise a revolutionary technology ("self-driving cars are coming"!)
2. Use that promise as a pretext to ignore all regulation
3. Make a fortune
4. Drop the tech story

Same goes for crypto
We also have to address the root reason that cryptocurrency exists, which is that there is a corrupt, overfinancialized casino economy that favors the rich, 2008 proved that the system is rigged so they can never lose, and ordinary people will continue to search for a fairer deal
A lot of young, idealistic people are getting caught up in cryptocurrency because they want to build a better world. Their talent and optimism deserve a better outlet than this scam money, and we all need a better alternative than the status quo
A lot of intelligent observers look at cryptocurrency, see that it makes no sense, and reasonably infer that they must be missing something profound on the technical level. Tech culture has a nice tradition of not deriding new ideas, but we need to break it here and speak out
From the outside (like from Congress's point of view) people see a trillion-dollar new tech industry, a lot of proponents who of course argue this is the next big thing, and some critics. They don't see the huge silent majority of tech people who know it's a scam. That's on us
This thread about cryptocurrency made it to the top of Hacker News and then got flagged off in about seven minutes, start to finish. Just to give you an idea of the polarization on this issue among nerds, and why people with doubts stay quiet Image
Many people in replies are saying "bullshit, there's no billions in laundered money moving over the blockchain!" Right-because it can't handle the volume! The big money laundering is crypto-adjacent and done through projects like Tether. Only ransomware *has* to use blockchain

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pinboard

Pinboard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Pinboard

Jan 5
Cryptocurrency and generative AI make roughly the same size claims to being transformative innovations, so it's interesting to see how many interesting things people have already found to do with the latter, while the first has mostly been an expensive tour through human folly
I like thinking of cryptocurrency as "financial string theory", but for the parallel to really work a lot more physicists would need to be in jail
With both crypto and string theory, you have domain experts in thrall to a mathematical apparatus so intellectually satisfying that they get emotionally invested into bringing it into contact with reality. But instead each failed attempt pushes them further out into la-la-land
Read 5 tweets
Dec 21, 2023
Rising from the crypt to talk a little about how pre-wikipedia generations lived. There was a big encyclopedia in the library, but only really rich families would own one. The best that poor kids could hope for was grocery store encyclopedias, bought one volume at a time
Grocery chains really would sell the world's saddest encyclopedia, one slim volume a week, and you felt lucky to have it. Unrestricted access to a full set of the Encyclopedia Britannica is the thing that felt most like having access to the world wide web in the pre-www days.
Naturally when the web came along, we all wondered how encyclopedias would work online, and for a brief while it looked like Microsoft would sell expensive access to a kind of crappy one. And then wikipedia appeared and blew everyone's mind by the fact that it worked
Read 8 tweets
Aug 28, 2023
Early this year I went online after taking too many drugs and ordered a Mongolian yurt. Here is my yurt, and here is my story: Image
The great thing about yurts is you can get high, make a deposit, and forget you bought one for seven months. Then in late July I got email giving me an imminent delivery date and demanding to see a photo of the finished substructure. I tried to bluff them with a quick Lowe's run Image
The yurt company was totally on to me, though. Everyone lies about the substructure. Demands for photo evidence grew insistent, and I found myself having to level heavy things in the desert while getting heatstroke


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Jul 28, 2023
This whole thread on large-scale circulation in the Atlantic Ocean is great, but the real showstopper is that global-warming induced breakdown in this flow will result in significant *cooling* for a large chunk of Eurasia, greatly complicating the politics of climate response.
The existing strategy for mitigating climate change is incoherent because:

1. It demands a total restructuring of societies worldwide
2. Most of this burden would fall on developing nations
3. It ignores imminent tipping points that (by definition) there is no coming back from
But with no politically achievable plan for capping (let alone reducing) global emissions, what will happen is we'll run into one of these tipping points, and if that happens to be AMOC collapse, then suddenly a bunch of G7 economies have much less incentive to decarbonize
Read 6 tweets
Mar 2, 2023
Cantonese and Uyghur have since been put back into Signal. But this whole thread shows a troubling level of ignorance from the person in charge of software people are supposed to entrust their lives and freedom to. There's no such language as Traditional Chinese, for starters.
People in Hong Kong speak Cantonese, which is written with traditional Chinese characters but is not legible to nonspeakers. In the past, the CCP's belief that Cantonese is just a wacky subdialect of Mandarin has made it easier for Cantonese speakers to hide in plain sight online
I don't expect Whittaker to know the subtleties of every language Signal supports, but to not understand the basics of how people would use the app in Hong Kong or the Uyghur diaspora this far in to her tenure is pretty appalling.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 28, 2023
Let's see what Google's been up to with their political giving—it's been a while! As a reminder, Google's PAC collects voluntary employee contributions, then gives that money to politicians the company supports. We begin our evening with a nice $5K to the Republican Majority Fund
Krysten Sinema fans on Twiiter will be chagrined to see Google only gave her $3000 (out of a possible $5K), but it's still early days in the 2024 election, plenty of time to top things off later.
On November 18 Google's PAC made the maximum legal donation, $5000, to Mitch McConnell's 2026 re-election campaign.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(