Nicola Guess Profile picture
Jun 1, 2021 21 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Our carbohydrate dosing study is out as a preprint!

medrxiv.org/cgi/content/sh…

I think this paper is going to cause some... discussion so I wanted to do a thread to hopefully help prevent over-interpretation of the data our study generated.
Design:

Crossover study: n=12.

We tested 5 different "doses" of carbohydrate (10,15,20,25,30%kcal) for 7 days in people with type 2 diabetes.

The menus aimed to keep weight constant.

Protein was kept at 15%kcal
We measured 24-hour glucose concentrations using CGM: the Medtronic iPro2.

Note: we did not measure ketones or insulin. This was a mistake in retrospect but we made this decision to reduce the burden on the participants as much as possible.
RESULTS: We found no difference in 24h, post-prandial, or fasting sensor glucose between the 10% and the 30% dose.

Nor did the data suggest any association between the carb doses and glucose.
Do I think this means that carb restriction has no effect on glucose when weight is maintained and when the carb is replaced with fat and not protein?

No, but I think the issue is far more nuanced than I/the nutrition science community has appreciated...
Here are my interpretations based on our data and those of others:
I think you probably need to get to a very low intake of carb (probably <50g/day?) to see a weight independent-effect on blood glucose concentrations.

We don't have conclusive data on mechanisms but obviously ketones could play a role here.
In our study the lowest dose was 10%kcal but given the kcals needed to maintain weight, this averaged about 65g per day. Some people had 93g at 10%kcal.

If we had measured ketones, this would have helped us with interpretation.
There are two studies (both by Garg) where modest reductions in carb intake (60%kcal vs 35%kcal, and 55% vs 40%kcal ) DID lower glucose substantially but the low carb diets in these two studies had a TON of MUFA, and low SFA.

Our study aimed to keep FA% constant.
And obviously I think it's pretty clear protein is a/the key ingredient for weight neutral reduction in glucose in a non-ketogenic diet.

I am not sure of many things in nutrition, but I am sure protein has important glucose-lowering properties in type 2 diabetes.
Let me also point out some important limitations:
First, we did provide all food, we kept in very close contact with the participants at all times (it was quite a burdensome study for participants) but this was not a ward-based study.

You can never be 100% sure people are sticking to the diets.
Second, I was SO SURE that there would be a difference in glucose concentrations between the 10% and 30% doses, we did not include doses higher than this.

If I could go back in time I would compare 5%, 25% and 45%.

You learn....
The sample size was small (only 12). (It was powered based on seeing 0.9mmol/L difference).

Mostly, my view is another eg 12 people would not have changed this:
The study was already quite a burden for people, so our "control" was pragmatic - we simply placed the CGM a day before they received their study meals to measure the person's glucose during their normal diet for 24-hours before they started each "dose".
Note - I expected there to be a very obvious drop in glucose going from normal to the doses - especially the lowest dose (10%kcal). Nope.

This was VERY surprising to me.
I think the CGM readings (you can see these in the supp data) are telling.

There is striking interday and intermeal variability.

And in many people glucose remains high nearly constantly - night time, fasting and interprandial glucose is high.
Something is needed to shut down the EGP?

Why does protein work? Is it a massive pp insulin surge which lowers pp glucose? But then how does this impact fasting?

Modest reduction in carb not enough? Need ketones to shut down EGP?
I think these are important questions for us to answer not only to help understand clinical management, but also to provide insight into the physiology of type 2 diabetes.
To end:

I am a clinical dietitian as well as a researcher and here is what I am taking from this study in terms of looking after my patients.

⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
I am no longer excited by the clinical utility of modest carb reductions to manage T2D independent of weight loss.

Though note - modest carb reduction remains a good way of helping people who like this way of eating to lose weight.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicola Guess

Nicola Guess Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Dr__Guess

Apr 2, 2023
Hi everyone, personalised nutrition companies are out here warning the public about glucose spikes from blueberries.

Yes, blueberries.

So I’ve written an 8-part series to debunk every glucose-related piece of nonsense you can imagine.
I start by comparing meal-related glucose rises in NGT to the prolonged hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes with some sophisticated drawings.

drguess.substack.com/p/what-is-type…
I do the same with prediabetes.

drguess.substack.com/p/what-is-pred…
Read 11 tweets
Feb 28, 2023
This new paper came out.

I read it for about 4 mins and decided watching Summer House season 5 again was a better use of my time.
Firstly, a key pillar of this paper is that there is a strong association between circulating erythritol and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
But erythritol is produced in the body via the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), a process which might be upregulated by oxidative stress.

COUGH COUGH REVERSE CAUSATION COUGH
Read 11 tweets
Jul 25, 2022
The @conversationUK asked me to write a piece on the lack of evidence behind “personalised nutrition”.

They did not tell me that the companies I was critiquing would get a right to reply with some unquestioned marketing guff.
This kind of bothsidesism is an enormous barrier to supporting the public in understanding science.

Luckily I have a twitter account (ha ha) and I try use it as a medium for making my field - nutrition science - more transparent.
IMO, these companies - backed by some of the best academic institutions in the world - are taking advantage of the interest the public has in improving their health with nutrition....
Read 20 tweets
Jul 24, 2022
My good friend (and PI of some legitimately excellent RCTs) Dr Sarah Berry has written a thread on personalised nutrition.

I think there is some stuff in there that needs clarifying.🧵
"Promising" findings from PN studies.

Let's look at these EU programmes (Food4me and PREVENTOMICS)..... Image
The PREVENTOMICS trial data (I could only find one published) was unequivocal:

"Personalized dietary plans did not result in greater benefits over a generic, but generally healthy diet" ImageImageImage
Read 10 tweets
May 27, 2021
The new highly competent SACN review on low-carb diets & T2D is out.

They came to the same conclusion as every other review (20+).

A thread on why we need to stop doing these reviews in the expectation they will tell us something new.

They won't.
These are the limitations noted by the reviewers.

They have been noted multiple times previously.

Reviewing the data in the same way again and again is not going to change this.
If you don't know:

1) how much carb, protein and fibre people are eating
2) the ratio of UFA:SFA
3) whether hypoglycaemic medications change
4) how much weight people lose.

You can't control for them.

Each of these factors affects the outcome, glycaemia.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 3, 2021
A paper came out last week with some new data on a ketogenic dietary intervention in prediabetes by @Virta. So it’s time for another tweetorial!
First of all (as mentioned in previous tweetorials) any new approaches to T2D prevention should be celebrated. Right now, pretty much one diet has been tested. Giving people at risk of T2D choice is A GREAT THING.
There’s good reason to think markedly reducing carbohydrate could help: if carbohydrate is reduced enough & protein isn’t too high, ketones get produced (this is the basis of Virta’s approach).
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(