Power10 retweet automation creator @JasonLSullivan_ has been excitedly promoting his new magainfo(dot)tv video site. This thread is not about that site, however. It is about another site with the same IP address: michaelsolisunus(dot)com.
(Previous thread on the now-defunct Power10 retweet automation software, as well as reporting from Business Insider on the topic) businessinsider.com/power10-activi…
At first glance, michaelsolisunus(dot)com looks like an empty website with placeholder "Home", "About Us", and "Contact Us" sections. What's up with that "Go to App" button in the corner?
The "Go to App" button leads to an authorization screen for a third-party Twitter app named "Michaelsolisunus" that requests a pretty comprehensive litany of permissions. We had @DrunkAlexJones give the mysterious app a whirl.
This is a good time to point out that one should exercise extreme caution when visiting dodgy websites or giving third-party apps permission to one's social media accounts, especially if one has no idea what the app in question does.
We (or rather @DrunkAlexJones) had to verify an email address in order to access all of the app's features. Interestingly, the confirmation email appears to be from Cyphoon, Power10 creator Sullivan's social media consulting company. reuters.com/article/us-usa…
Much like the old Power10 automation app (banned in September 2019), the Michaelsolisunus app offers automated retweets and automated follows. It also has some rudimentary analytics features, including the ability to track and log the retweeters of a set of tweets.
We poked through the app's Javascript code and found a constant indicating the maximum length of a tweet is 140 characters (Twitter bumped it to 280 in late 2018). In addition to being amusing, this is a possible indicator that the developer reused code from several years ago.
We had trouble getting some of the Michaelsolisunus app's features to work, and were also unable to find any content that had been retweeted with it. If either of these things change, this thread will be updated with additional analysis.
Update: both the Michaelsolisunus Twitter app and the @JasonLSullivan_ Twitter account are presently suspended.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
None of these chefs exist, as they're all AI-generated images. This hasn't stopped them from racking up lots of engagement on Facebook by posting AI-generated images of food (and occasional thoughts and prayers), however.
cc: @ZellaQuixote
These "chefs" are part of a network of 18 Facebook pages with names like "Cook Fastly" and "Emily Recipes" that continually post AI-generated images of food. While many of these pages claim to be US-based, they are have admins in Morocco per Facebook's Page Transparency feature.
Between them, these 18 Facebook "chef" pages have posted AI-generated images of food at least 36,000 times in the last five months. Not all of the images are unique; many have been posted repeatedly, sometimes by more than one of the alleged chefs.
Can simple text generation bots keep sophisticated LLM chatbots like ChatGPT engaged indefinitely? The answer is yes, which has some potentially interesting implications for distinguishing between conversational chatbots and humans.
For this experiment, four simple chatbots were created:
• a bot that asks the same question over and over
• a bot that replies with random fragments of a work of fiction
• a bot that asks randomly generated questions
• a bot that repeatedly asks "what do you mean by <X>?"
The output of these chatbots was used as input to an LLM chatbot based on the 8B version of the Llama 3.1 model. Three of the four bots were successful at engaging the LLM chatbot in a 1000-message exchange; the only one that failed was the repetitive question bot.
The spammers behind the "Barndominium Gallery" Facebook page have branched out into AI-generated video and started a YouTube channel with the catchy name "AY CUSTOM HOME". The results are just about as craptastic as you'd expect.
In this synthetically generated aerial video of a (nonexistent) barndominium under construction, the geometry of the roof changes, a blue building appears, and a tree vanishes, all in the course of just three seconds.
This AI-generated barndominium features a long AI-generated porch with some chairs on it. Exactly how many chairs there are depends on what angle you look at it from, however, as the chair on the left splits into three chairs as the camera pans.
Some observations regarding @Botted_Likes (permanent ID 1459592225952649221)...
First, "viral posts which don't result in follower growth and have very little engagement in the reply section" is not a useful heuristic for detecting botted likes. Why not?
cc: @ZellaQuixote
"Viral posts that do not result in follower growth" is not a valid test for botting, because posts from large accounts often go viral among the large account's existing followers but do not reach other audiences, resulting in high like/repost counts but little/no follower growth.
"Very little engagement in the reply section" doesn't work for multiple reasons (some topics spur debate and some don't, some people restrict replies, etc)
Hilariously, @Botted_Likes seems to be ignoring their own criteria, as many of the posts they feature have tons of replies.
As with the banned @emywinst account, the @kamala_wins47 account farms engagement by reposting other people's videos, accompanied by bogus claims that the videos have been deleted from Twitter. These video posts frequently garner massive view counts.
@Emywinst @kamala_wins47 The operator of the @kamala_wins47 account generally follows up these viral video posts with one or more replies advertising T-shirts sold on bestusatee(dot)com. This strategy is identical to that used by the banned @emywinst account.
What's up with all these similarly-worded enthusiastic posts about a Pierre Poilievre rally in Kirkland Lake, and are they all from accounts that are less than a month old? (Spoiler: yes, they are.) #Spamtastic
cc: @ZellaQuixote
An X search for "Pierre Poilievre", "Kirkland Lake", and "refreshing" performed on August 4th, 2024 turned up 151 posts from 151 accounts. All are new accounts, with the oldest having been created less than a month ago, on July 7th, 2024. (Some have since been suspended by X.)
The most intense period of activity for this group of accounts was on August 3rd, 2024, when the repetitive posts about the Poilievre rally were posted. Each account also has at least one earlier post on a random topic; some of these older posts seem to cut off abruptly.