Thread by @vedatells

Impotent political Hindus instead of answering or doing something stirct against these degenrates,they try to Validate their $exuality using our sanatana dharma.

Continue with this thread , I'll clarify some(almost all claims) related to L¢B£Q& Hinduism.

Before clearing all their claims lets understand some basics .
• Vedas have Injuctions only for male and female couples ( विवाह सूक्त ) , Only masculine and feminine terms are used . there is no place for inter$exual marriage . It's completely against Vedas .

• Manusmriti,Narad smriti,Vishnu Smriti
Describes strict punishment for a man having sex with man , or a women having sex with a virgin girl,Two virgins having.
Punishment:- To outcaste them ,cut their fingers (even if not Literal it's a sin) Manusmriti 8 / 369-370,11 / 174

Vedas are the highest proof Then comes the Smritis and then Puranas ( Part consisting rules ) . “ History is not considered a proof if it goes against Vedas and Smritis ”
Now we'll check their claims

Claim 1:- ArdhaNarishvara in support of L€BT
At first There is no proof that Humans should behave like Gods or humans should behave on the basis of some exceptions in history instead of rules. Gods,rishis,gandharvas have diff set of capacity and rules.
+++++

Purpose of ArdhaNarishvara was to do the creation of "man" and women". Are ¢ays and €sbians able to do that?

ArdhaNarishvara shows both feminine and masculine aspects are necessary for creation. You should've saved those aspects of you instead of distorting them.

Claim 2:- Fakedutt Patnaik and His bhakts that Rigveda states "Vikritim eva prakriti"

Well there is not a single verse in Vedas as such. Similar विकृतिं एव प्रकृति कुर्यात is a famous Term among Mimansakas but it is related to Sacrifices not for "that which is vikriti is prakrit

Claim 3:- Shukla Yajurveda Brahmana 2/4/4/19 and Bhagvatam 6/18/4-6 describes the sexual relationship b/w Mitra and Varuna. It's written that Mitra implants it's seed in Varuna🌺

++🌺In Shatpath brahman 2/4/4/18 it's written that "अर्धमासौ मित्रावरुणौ" mitra and varun are "half the month". Increasing mo =Varuna, decreasing mo=Mitra further "Mitra and Varuna meets on no moon day is described". They are just shown as time here🌺

In Bhagvatam 6/18/4-6 the relationship of mitra Varuna with urvashi is described not within themselves.

Claim 4/5:- Mohini Avtar of Bhagvan Vishnu is $ransgender
Hindus can hear hari Ninda just to increase their population. bhagvatam 8/8/41 clearly describes it as "योषिता" a women not a transgender. Mohini rupa is worshipped as women not as $rans€ender.

These Degenrates calls Lord ayappa as a result of Homosexual relationship b/w Shiva and Mohini. Shiva is male, Mohini is female. Why do these people want to satisfy their lust through our religion.

Claim 6:- Hinduism has Concept of Tritiya prakriti& Kliba etc
Enunchs (Kinnars) are tritiya Prakriti not you people. मेढ्र शुक्राभ्यां हीनः क्लीवःस उच्यते ”{Katyayana } The one without the semen or reproductive organ is called Kliba
Mentioning does not mean supporting

In the second chapter of Virat Parva/Chap 27 Arjuna is called “तृतीया प्रकृति गता°” means he lived like an enunch for a year.

Claim 7:- Kauhsitiki B(2/4) states that if a man desire to be loves by man or women. It proves homosexuality in Vedas

This is complete wrong translation It says "If we are loved by one man or one women or many men or many women"

Claim 8:- Narada smriti talks about Mukhebhaga and Aksheya Ho¢$exual male🌺
yes ofcourse! narad smriti describe it as a disease. It's time you must accept it. They are called Patits(fallen) and no talking is adviced with them.

Claim 9- Shvetasvatar 5/10 describes Soul is not men women.
where is it written that soul is L€BT
You're supporting H©m©$exuality by Soul or Body? You're making physical relations by Soul or Body? Soul doesn't have any action too. U can't impose the Dharma of soul on body.

Claim 9:- Khajuraho has erotic Sculptures🌺
Sculptures can't decide what's wrong and right. Khajuraho has bestality too
There r many explanations to it
(i) temples can also show what is wrong,all these things are prohibited in Scriptures. So someone craved it to show what's wrn

Second is to show that all these unnatural lust etc exist only outside not near the God. They are on the outer parts of temple not where people have darshan.

Whatever is correct Sculptures, history can't decide your dharma.
Otherwise future generations can find Marrying muslims as dharma too just because some Hindu women married muslim in history and surely there are paintings too.

Other claims are related to Sudhyumna,Shikhandi,arjuna,sambha etc. The first and last thing is "History is no proof". Vedas>>>>>Smritis>>Itihasa Puranas.
And if you want to know answers then I have already Explained them in Instagram posts. You can read there.

We are Hindus.
We practice Sense control
We practice the methods shown by God&Rishis.
If you are really thinking that we are accepting and we can accept degeneracy then this is not Sanatana Dharma.
A वैश्या modify herself to attract people,Our Dharma doesn't need any modification

@Vyasonmukh @shri_v @VedVedantaa @kaundabhatta @SaffronVaibhav @entropied

@threadreaderapp unroll