🚨urgent🚨 hello epic rare find alert think i just stumbled across a mothman stuffed animal
its just one of those days. may post cool finds in this thread (1936)
mfw the old lady checking me out calls the mothman stuffed animal “the bat boy”
this is pretty cool. i literally just dug this out of a massive dirty barn full of broken wooden furniture and random antiques (as in i had to full-on climb over piles of stuff to find it)
🐝 🐝 🐝
anyone trying to learn about the specific gravity of honey
uh oh
bro please its a completely different bee ethnicity bro please just try raising them theyre not even the same size
bees have raceism
hello i will show you more books i found today. the lady who owned the barn did not know what to charge me so i suggested $2 a book and she eagerly agreed.
found book of mormon. grabbed it because i couldnt find the date + noticed its formatting, which is more like a normal book than the 4 column layout i usually see. thought it might be an old one from before it was “reformatted” (or something, not 100% on the history) but its not
heres an interesting one. i think this is from 1870. i picked this up mostly because you can see that signature in one of the images, i thought it might have actually been signed by the guy who its about, but turns out thats just how its printed. interesting either way:
the signature is obviously very odd. the image of him is an engraving, so, did this guy (who the book is about) sign the engraving plate at the bottom? is that why it looks like that? was his handwriting actually just that bad? old guy who shakey hands? we may never know.
part of the interesting thing with finding this stuff is wondering what the tale is. example: this box of books had a few mormon things in it. so i thought, okay, maybe a mormon guy pooled these. but the actual commonality was books from independence missouri, not denomination
didnt pick up the other books but in the box was also baptist and other random christian stuff all from independence missouri. so, whats the deal. was it someone else like me who was just pooling interesting christian books and happened to live there? of course we will never know
other random find. got a cool last one to close things off
kind of speaks for itself. pretty heavy duty. this one was from the same place that had the mothman stuffed animal. overall an excellent day for book patrol. there are books, very cheap, waiting for you on the side of the road, fellow traveler
thread from last time. not trying to flex like i drop a lot of money on books or anything, i get this stuff insanely cheap. hope your weekend is going well so far.
i was sitting in an office recently and looked down at a table of magazines. one had a decorated cake on the cover. i asked myself: is it real, or AI? all images will now be run through this hermeneutic. this is, literally, “dehumanizing”: to deprive of positive human qualities.
once again the AI image conversation should be steered away from “is it good or bad?”, “is it cool or lame?” (subjective, no way to prove these) towards: what does it mean? what does it do? but this angle is less explosively polarizing and more difficult to get attention with.
one time i worked at a traveling art exhibition. it was billed as art from egyptian tombs, but it was actually recreations of the art found in egyptian tombs. this was crazy unethical but i got the job via a long convoluted process accidentally, then quit.
zygmunt bauman (modern social theorist) says that the constantly shifting and unclear nature of our time period also applies to interpersonal relationships: no one is quite sure what it means, specifically, to be a parent, a grandparent, a friend, a coworker, and so on.
[…]
this sounds nonsensical at first - we can define all these terms easily: what a friend or grandparent is. but no one is clear on the obligations that these relationships entail, their day to day norms, what is expected, what assumptions are being made on either side: all unclear.
you see this a lot with present discussions about new parents looking to their parents to step into the role of grandparent. what does that look like, specifically? what is to be expected? this is a huge source of frustration and tension for many people, with no clear answer.
photos instead of paintings (all this was later removed):
this is one of my favorite image parings to show people. in person when you swipe back and forth you can sometimes see it rewire something in their brain about america. same room in the white house, before and after:
it looks like the AI conversation is going to cement around “are artists are coping or not” but id like to submit a second option: that its worthy of skepticism that my broke friends are beholden to copyright laws that apparently don’t apply to tech people making a lot of money
the AI question really should be: are we doing wild west on copyright laws or not. if we are, okay - then that should apply to everyone. if we’re not - okay, then that should apply to everyone. everyone is basically arguing that now tech companies get to be the exception to them.
if my friends can get cease and desist letters for making fanart about a movie or franchise when money gets involved but a guy can also make a billion dollars feeding that movie and franchise into his image maker and selling access to it, i dont think its out of line to ask: what
one key aspect of postmodernism is that art styles are self-consciously deployed as pastiche. this means theyre just used as surface, for what they represent: they become interchangeable. these almost meaningless academic concepts will increasingly characterize your everyday life
when an entire artistic milieu is used just for what it represents, not what it actually is (this already happened a long time ago), the blowback is that it becomes impossible to genuinely use and engage with those milieus. you can’t decide to not be self aware of this process.
this is, in my opinion, the actual origin of what is called “stuck culture”. to start a “nu-metal” band would be referencing what “nu-metal” is. you and the audience would both know that you’re aware of this. that awareness is the source of the “block” - everything is self aware.
the 'people not having kids' trend: fascinating. people can do whatever. but as a larger trend, clearly something is up. likewise, when i ask the older generation why they all had kids, they don't know. they "just did"
so i looked up why non-human animals might not breed
[...]
one fascination i have with this topic is that it seems to be instinctual, thus the turn to animals. in my parents friend group, they all had kids around the same time. i (probably too much) grilled them about why they all did this and they all gave some version of "we just did"
that's "just what you did". okay. as though compelled by something beyond them. not religious, running the spectrum of affluence, no clear answer. likewise, despite the internet obsession with this, there's no clear answer. internet? maybe. politics? maybe. nothing great, imo.